The paper raises some problems caused by `associational thinking' in social science by reference to examples from the literature on economic organisation and gender. Associational thinking focuses on common associations between social phenomena, such as the gendering of organisations, without asking counterfactual questions about the status of these relationships, for example, whether organisations are unavoidably gendered or only contingently so. It is argued these questions have been inadequately resolved in the literature, as a consequence of a reluctance to engage in counterfactual reasoning and abstraction, and a neglect of the extent to which systems - as opposed to the lifeworld - are `identity-blind'. These questions are pursued through discussions of whether markets and bureaucracies are inherently gendered. It is argued further that associational thinking has also clouded the normative judgements implicit in the critiques of gendered organisations.
Acker, J.1990. `Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organisations'. Gender and Society5:390-407.
2.
Acker, J.1998. `The Future of “Gender and Organisations”: Connections and Boundaries'. Gender, Work and Organisations5:195-206.
3.
Adkins, L. 1995. Gendered Work: Sexuality, Family and the Labour Market. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
Alvesson, M. and Billing, Y. D. 1997. Understanding Gender and Organisations. London: Sage.
5.
Baier, A. 1994. Moral Prejudices. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
6.
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hassocks: Harvester.
7.
Blau, P.N. and Meyer, M. M. 1971. Bureaucracy in Modern Society. New York: Random House.
8.
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
9.
Bowring, F.1996. `A Lifeworld without a Subject: Habermas and the Pathologies of Modernity. Telos106:77-104.
10.
Buchanan, A. E. 1985. Ethics, Efficiency and the Market. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11.
Coole, D.1996. `Class - A Difference that Makes a Difference?'. Radical Philosophy77:17-25.
12.
Ferguson, K. E. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
14.
Fraser, N.1995. `From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of a “Post-Socialist Age” '. New Left Review212:68-93.
15.
Fraser, N. 1997. `Heterosexism, Misrecognition, and Capitalism: a Response to Judith Butler'. Social Text 52/53, Vol 15, Nos 3 and 4, pp. 278-289.
16.
Gherardi, S. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organisational Cultures. London: Sage.
17.
Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, transl. by T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
Habermas, J. 1997. Beyond Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
Halford, S. , Savage, M. and Witz, A. 1997. Gender, Careers and Organisations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
20.
Hall, S. 1996. `When was the “Post-Colonial”? Thinking at the Limit', in I. Chambers and L. Curti (eds.), The Post-Colonial Question. London: Routledge.
21.
Hartmann, H.1979. `The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism'. Capital and Class8:1-32.
22.
Hearn, D.et al. (eds.) 1989. The Sexuality of Organisations. London: Sage.
23.
Hodgson, G. M. 1988. Economics and Institutions. Cambridge: Polity.
24.
Hodgson, G. M. 1999. Economics and Utopia. London: Routledge.
25.
Kanter, R. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Keat, R. 1997. `Values and Preferences in Neo-classical Environmental Economics', in J. Foster (ed.), Valuing Nature. London: Routledge.
27.
McDowell, L. 1997. Capital Culture: Gender at Work in the City. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
New, C.1996. `Man Bad, Woman Good: Essentialisms and Ecofeminisms'. New Left Review216:79-93.
29.
Offe, C. 1984. `Ungovernability: The Renaissance of Conservative Theories of Crisis', in J. Keane (ed.), Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
30.
O'Neill, J. 1998. The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics.
31.
Outhwaite, W. (ed.) 1996. The Habermas Reader. Cambridge: Polity.
32.
Phillips. A. (ed.) 1987. Feminism and Equality. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
Pringle, R. 1989. Secretaries Talk. London: Verso.
34.
Ramsay, K. and Parker, M. 1992. `Gender, Bureaucracy and Organisational Culture', in M. Savage and A. Witz (eds.), Gender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
Savage, M. and Witz, A. (eds.) 1992. Gender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
36.
Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science. London: Routledge.
37.
Sayer, A. 1995. Radical Political Economy: A Critique. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
Sayer, A.1997. `Essentialism, Social Constructionism and Beyond'. Sociological Review45:454-486.
39.
Sevenhuijsen, S. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care. London: Routledge.
40.
Sheppard, D. L. 1989. `Organizations, Power and Sexuality: The Image and Self-image of Women Managers', pp. 139-157 in D. Hearnet al. (eds.), The Sexuality of Organizations. London: Sage.
41.
Shields, R.1999. `Culture and the Economy of Cities'. European Urban and Regional Studies6:303-311.
42.
Siltanen, J. 1994. Locating Gender: Occupational Segregation, Wages and Domestic Responsibilities. London: UCL Press.
43.
Skeggs, B. 1997. Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage.
44.
Smith, D. E. 1987. `Women's Perspectives as a Radical Critique of Sociology', in S. Harding (ed.), Feminism and Methodology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
45.
Tronto, J. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
46.
Walby, S. 1986. Patriarchy at Work. Cambridge: Polity.
47.
Walby, S. 1990. Theorising Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
