Repeated Exposure to Media Messages Encouraging Parent-Child Communication about Sex: Differential Trajectories for Mothers and Fathers

Abstract

Purpose.

To examine changes in parent-child communication related to sexual behavior after exposure to public health messages.

Design.

Randomized, controlled trial that was part of precampaign message testing.

Setting.

Exposure occurred online or through DVDs mailed to participants and viewed on their personal computers. Data collection occurred via a secure Web site.

Patients.

Participants included parents (n = 1969) living with a child age 10 to 14 years drawn from a nationally representative sample of U.S. households.

Intervention.

Treatment participants were exposed to video, audio, and print advertisements that promoted the benefits of speaking to their children early and often about delaying initiation of sexual activity; messages also directed parents to an informational Web site.

Measures.

The dependent variable assessed frequency of parent-child communication related to sexual behavior. The primary independent variable was treatment assignment.

Analysis.

Longitudinal growth modeling that included five waves of data.

Results.

The trajectory of growth over time differed between fathers in the treatment group and fathers in the control group (F [1, 2357] = 4.15; p < .042), indicating more frequent communication among treatment fathers than among control fathers. Trajectories did not differ between mothers in treatment and control groups.

Conclusion.

This study demonstrates that father-child and mother-child communication patterns differ over time in response to public health messages. Findings have implication for researchers developing health marketing campaigns.

Keywords

Health Communication Parent-Child Relations Adolescents Sexual Behavior Prevention Research Manuscript format: quantitative research Research purpose: efficacy evaluation Study design: randomized controlled trial Outcome measure: frequency of parent-child communication 1. Setting: family 2. Health focus: adolescent sexual health 3. Strategy: health communication,health promotion 4. Target population age: parents (age 35 to 55 years) of children age 10 to 14 years 5. Target population circumstance: nationally representative Web-based panel

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

DiIorio

Kelley

Hockenberry-Eaton

Communication about sexual issues: Mothers, fathers, and friends. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24:181–189.

Fisher

. An extension of the findings of Moore, Peterson, and Furstenberg (1986) regarding family sexual communication and adolescent sexual behavior. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51:637–639.

Guilamo-Ramos

Jaccard

Dittus

Collins

. Parent-adolescent communication about sexual intercourse: An analysis of maternal reluctance to communicate. Health Psychol. 2008;27:760–769.

Jaccard

Dittus

Gordon

. Parent-adolescent congruency in reports of adolescent sexual behavior and in communications about sexual behavior. Child Develop. 1998;69:247–261.

Aspy

Vesely

Oman

. Parental communication and youth sexual behaviour. J Adolesc. 2007;30:449–466.

Lehr

DiIorio

Dudley

Lipana

. The relationship between patient-adolescent communication and safer sex behaviors in college students. J Fam Nurs. 2000;6:180–196.

Fisher

. Family communication and the sexual behavior and attitudes of college students. J Youth Adolesc. 1987;16:481–495.

Fox

Inazu

. Mother-daughter communication about sex. Family Relations. 1980;29:347–352.

DiIorio

Resnicow

Dudley

. Social cognitive factors associated with mother-adolescent communication about sex. J Health Commun. 2000;5:41–51.

10.

Blake

Simkin

Ledsky

. Effects of a parent-child communications intervention on young adolescents' risk for early onset of sexual intercourse. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33:52–61.

11.

Hutchinson

Cooney

. Patterns of parent-teen sexual risk communication: Implications for intervention. Family Relations. 1998;47:185–194.

12.

Miller

Kotchick

Dorsey

. Family communication about sex: What are parents saying and are their adolescents listening? Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:218–222, 235.

13.

Rosenthal

Feldman

. The importance of importance: Adolescents' perceptions of parental communication about sexuality. J Adolesc. 1999;22:835–851.

14.

Ogle

Glasier

Riley

. Communication between parents and their children about sexual health. Contraception. 2008;77:283–288.

15.

Martino

Elliott

Corona

. Beyond the “big talk”: The roles of breadth and repetition in parent-adolescent communication about sexual topics. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e612–e618.

16.

Evans

Davis

Zhang

. Health communication and marketing research with new media. Cases Public Health Commun Marketing. 2008;11:140–158.

17.

Manlove

Terry

Gitelson

. Explaining demographic trends in teenage fertility. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000;166–175.

18.

Petty

Cacioppo

. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986.

19.

Slovic

Finucane

Peters

MacGregor

. Risk as Analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis. 2004;24:311–322.

20.

Jaccard

Dodge

Dittus

. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: A conceptual framework. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002;97:9–41.

21.

Witte

. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59:329–349.

22.

Evans

Silber-Ashley

Gard

. Social marketing as a strategy to reduce unintended adolescent pregnancy. Open Commun J. 2007;1:1–8.

23.

Davis

Blitstein

Evans

Kamyab

. Impact of a parent-child sexual communication campaign: Results from a controlled efficacy trial of parents. Reprod Health. 2010;7:17.

24.

Evans

Davis

Ashley

. Efficacy of abstinence promotion media messages: Findings from an online randomized trial. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:409–416.

25.

National Commission on Children. Survey of Parents and Chidren, 1990. Ann Arbor, Mich: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; 1999.

26.

Scher

Maynard

Stagner

. Interventions intended to reduce pregnancy-related outcomes among adolescents. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2006;12. doi:10.4073/csr.2006.12

27.

Wyckoff

Miller

Forehand

. Patterns of sexuality communications between preadolescents and their mothers and fathers. J Child Fam Stud. 2008;17:649–662.

28.

SAS Institute. SAS Procedures Guide. Online Version 9. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2004.

29.

Laird

Ware

. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38:963–974.

30.

DuRant

Wolfson

LaFrance

. An evaluation of a mass media campaign to encourage parents of adolescents to talk to their children about sex. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:298.e1–298.e9.

31.

Meyers

. Adapting parent education programs to meet the needs of fathers. Family Relations. 1993;42:447–452.

32.

Hornik

. Exposure: Theory and evidence about all the ways it matters. Social Marketing Quarterly. 2002;8:30–37.