Community Capacity as an “Inside Job”: Evolution of Perceived Ownership within a University-Aboriginal Community Partnership

Abstract

Purpose.

To assess the evolution of perceived ownership of a university-Aboriginal community partnership across three project stages.

Design.

Survey administration to project partners during project formalization (1996—T1), mobilization (1999—T2), and maintenance (2004—T3).

Setting.

Aboriginal community of Kahnawake, outside Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Participants.

Partners involved in influencing decision making in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP).

Measure and Analysis.

A measure of perceived primary ownership subjected to linear trend analysis.

Results.

KSDPP staff were perceived as primary owner at T1 and shared ownership with Community Advisory Board (CAB) members at T2 and T3. Trend tests indicated greater perceived ownership between T1 and T3 for CAB (χ²₁ = 12.3, p < .0001) and declining KSDPP staff (χ²₁ = 10.5, p < .001) ownership over time. Academic partners were never perceived as primary owners.

Conclusion.

This project was community driven from the beginning. It was not dependent on an external academic change agent to activate the community and develop the community's capacity to plan and implement a solution. It still took several years for the grassroots CAB to take responsibility from KSDPP staff, thus indicating the need for sustained funding to build grassroots community capacity.

Keywords

Indians North American Capacity Building Community-Based Participatory Research Self-Determination Health Promotion Prevention Research Manuscript format: applied research brief Research purpose: process evaluation Study design: quantitative (trend analysis)Outcome measure: perceived ownership Setting: community Health focus: type 2 diabetes prevention Strategy: culture change Target population age: adults partnering in community-based participatory research Target population circumstances: Aboriginal populations,academic researchers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

H-T

. Practical Program Evaluation. Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation and Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2005.

Wallerstein

. Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:39–53.

Friere

Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press; 1970.

Wallerstein

Duran

. The roots of community based participatory research. In: Minkler

Wallerstein

, eds. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2003:27–52.

Chino

Debruyn

. Building true capacity: indigenous models for indigenous communities. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:596–599.

Macaulay

Paradis

Potvin

. The Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project: intervention, evaluation, and baseline results of a diabetes primary prevention program with a native community in Canada. Prev Med. 1997;26:779–790.

Cargo

Mercer

. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–350.

Cargo

Lévesque

Macaulay

. Community governance of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project, Kahnawake Territory, Mohawk Nation, Canada. Health Promot Int. 2003;18:177–187.

Cargo

Delormier

Lévesque

. Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic indigenous community partnership. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:904–914.

10.

Flynn

. Measuring community leaders' perceived ownership of health education programs: initial tests of reliability and validity. Health Educ Res. 1995;10:27–36.

11.

Goodman

Speers

McLeroy

. Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:258–278.

12.

Fetterman

Wandersman

Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005.