The claim for the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA) is that children may share their sense of competence for, and value of, everyday occupations. To establish whether self-report items meet their purpose, assurances regarding construct validity depend not only on quantitative methodology but also on qualitative methods. This study aimed to reveal how Dutch children with special needs interpret the translated American COSA items, and whether their answers fit the intended meaning. Six 8- to 12-year-old Dutch children with special needs participated in the research. Data were collected via the Three-Step Test-Interview (cognitive interviewing) and analyzed using the constant comparative method. Results showed variations in children's interpretation, discrepancies between scores and stories, and translation inaccuracies. These data can be used to improve the Dutch COSA. Cognitive interviewing enhances both the construct validity of this self-assessment and the collaborative process of reasoning, decision making, and goal setting with a child during self-assessment.
AsbjornslettM., & HemmingssonH. (2008). Participation at school as experienced by teenagers with physical disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 15, 153–161.
BlairJ.ConradF.AckermannCastellano A., & ClaxtonG. (2006). The effect of sample size on cognitive interview findings. In: American Statistical Association.Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ see Papers presented at the 61st Annual Conference.
4.
BogdanR. C., & BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
5.
BundyA. C. (2008). Play and playfulness: What to look for. In ParhamL. D. & FazioL. (Eds.), Play in occupational therapy for children (2nd ed., pp. 52–66; 4). St. Louis: Mosby.
6.
CavetJ., & SloperP. (2004). Participation of disabled children in individual decisions about their lives and in public decisions about service development. Children & Society, 18, 278–290.
CollinsD. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229–238.
9.
ConnorsC., & StalkerK. (2007). Children's experiences of disability: Pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disability & Society, 22, 19–33.
10.
CurtinM., & MurtaghJ. (2007). Participation of children and young people in research: Competence, power and representation. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 67–72.
11.
DelfosM. F. (2011). Are you listening to me? Communication with children from four to twelve years old [in Dutch] (16th ed.). Amsterdam: uitgeverij SWP Amsterdam.
12.
Expertise Centrum Ergotherapie [Expert Centre Occupational Therapy]. (2004). COSA: Child Occupational Self Assessment, revised version 2004. (Dutch translation). Amsterdam: Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Domein Gezondheid.
13.
ForsythB.KudelaStapleton M.LawrenceD.LevinK., & WillisG. (2006). Methods for translating survey questionnaires. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. American Association for Public Opinion Research. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/ see Papers presented at the 61st Annual Conference.
14.
HakT.van der VeerK., & JansenH. (2008). The Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI): An observation-based method for pretesting self-completion questionnaires. Survey Research Methods, 2, 143–150. Retrieved from http://w4.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/index.
15.
HakT.van der VeerK., & OmmundsenR. (2006). An application of the Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI): A validation study of the Dutch and Norwegian versions of the ‘Illegal Alien Scale’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 215–227.
16.
HearnshawH. (2004). Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. British Medical Journal, 328, 140–141.
17.
HenryA. D. (2000). Pediatric Interest Profiles: Surveys of play for children and adolescents. San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders.
18.
HersenM., & ThomasJ. C. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of clinical interviewing with children. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
19.
HemmingssonH.EgilsonS.HoffmanO., & KielhofnerG. (2005a). School Setting Interview (SSI) (version 3.0). Nacka, Sweden: Swedish Association of Occupational Therapists.
20.
HemmingssonH.EgilsonS.HoffmanO., & KielhofnerG. (2005b). A user's manual for the School Setting Interview (SSI) (version 3.0). Chicago: MOHO Clearinghouse, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago.
21.
HoppstaedterW. (2006). Toileting severely disabled children: Experiences of parental caregiver (Master's thesis, European Master of Science in Occupational Therapy, Naestved, Denmark). Retrieved from http://otkidu.neurotec.ki.se/kidu/.
22.
IrwinL. G., & JohnsonJ. (2005). Interviewing young children: Explicating our practices and dilemmas. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 821–831.
23.
KellerJ.KafkesA.BasuS.FedericoJ., & KielhofnerG. (2005). The Child Occupational Self Assessment (COSA) (version 2.1.). Chicago: MOHO Clearinghouse, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago.
24.
KellerJ., & KielhofnerG. (2005). Psychometric characteristics of the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA), part two: Refining the psychometric properties. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 12, 147–158.
25.
KielhofnerG. (2008). Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
26.
KingG.LawM.KingS.HurleyP.RosenbaumP.HannaS.YoungM. (2004). Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
27.
KnoxS. H. (2010). Play. In Case-SmithJ. & O'BrienJ. C. (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (6th ed., pp. 540). St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby.
28.
KollerM.AaronsonN. K.BlazebyJ.BottomleyA.DewolfL.FayersP.WestK. (2007). Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach. European Journal of Cancer, 43, 1810–1820.
29.
KramerJ. (2011). Using mixed methods to establish the social validity of a self-report assessment: An illustration using the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 52–76. doi:10.1177/1558689810386376.
30.
KramerJ.KielhofnerG., & SmithE. V.Jr. (2010). Validity evidence for the Child Occupational Self Assessment (COSA). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 621–632.
31.
KvaleS., & BrinkmannS. (2008). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
32.
LawM.BaptisteS.CarswellA.McCollM.PolatajkoH., & PollockN. (2005). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOT Publications.
33.
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport [Dutch Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Sport]. (2007). Annual report of the Central Commission for Human Research for the year 2006, parliamentary paper [in Dutch]. Retrieved from http://www.ccmo-online.nl/main.asp?pid=2&sid=5#jv
34.
MissiunaC.PollockN., & LawM. (2004). Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting system (PEGS). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
35.
ParhamL. D.PrimeauL. (2008). Play and occupational therapy. In ParhamL. D. & FazioL. S. (Eds.), Play in occupational therapy for children (2nd ed., pp. 2–22). St. Louis: Mosby.
36.
PolitD. F., & BeckC. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
37.
ReillyM. (1974). Play as exploratory learning: A study of curiosity behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
38.
RileyA. W. (2004) Evidence that school-age children can self-report on their health. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 4, 374–376.
39.
RodgerS., & ZivianiJ. (Eds.) (2006). Occupational therapy with children: Understanding children's occupations and enabling participation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
40.
SturgessJ.RodgerS., & OzanneA. (2002). A review of the use of assessment with young self-report children. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 108–116.
41.
SumsionT., & LawM. (2006). A review of evidence on the conceptual elements informing client-centred practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73, 153–162.
42.
TourangeauR. (1984). Cognitive aspects of survey design: Building a bridge between disciplines. In WillisG. (Ed.), Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design (pp. 35–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
43.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30177.html
44.
Van NesF.AbmaT.JonssonH., & DeegD. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation?European Journal of Ageing, 7, 313–316. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.
45.
WilliamsonE.GoodenoughT.KentJ., & AshcroftR. (2005). Conducting research with children: The limits of confidentiality and child protection protocols. Children & Society, 19, 397–409.
46.
WillisG. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
