Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has promising potential for dose reduction in medical applications, while suffering from low image quality caused by noise. Therefore, it is in urgent need for developing new algorithms to obtain high-quality images for LDCT.
Methods:
This study tries to exploit the sparse and low-rank properties of images and proposes a new algorithm based on subspace identification. The collection of transmission data is sparsely represented by singular value decomposition and the eigen-images are then denoised by block-matching frames. Then, the projection is regularized by the correlation information under the frame of prior image compressed sensing (PICCS). With the application of a typical analytical algorithm on the processed projection, the target images are obtained. Both numerical simulations and real data verifications are carried out to test the proposed algorithm. The numerical simulations data is obtained based on real clinical scanning three-dimensional data and the real data is obtained by scanning experimental head phantom.
Results:
In simulation experiment, using new algorithm boots the means of PSNR and SSIM by 1 dB and 0.05, respectively, compared with BM3D under the Gaussian noise with variance 0.04. Meanwhile, on the real data, the proposed algorithm exhibits superiority over compared algorithms in terms of noise suppression, detail preservation and computational overhead. The means of PSNR and SSIM are improved by 1.84 dB and 0.1, respectively, compared with BM3D under the Gaussian noise with variance 0.04.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of a new algorithm based on subspace identification for LDCT. It exploits the similarity among three-dimensional data to improve the image quality in a concise way and shows a promising potential on future clinical diagnosis.
ZhangZ., LiangX., ZhaoW.et al., Noise2Context: Context-assisted learning 3D thin-layer for low-dose CT. Medical Physics48(10) (2021), 5794–5803.
2.
HanM., ShimH., BaekJ.Low-dose CT denoising via convolutional neural network with an observer loss function. Medical Physics48(10) (2021), 5727–5742.
3.
YuankeZ. Noise Reduction for Low-Dose X-Ray Computed Tomography, Xi’an: Xi’an University of Electronic Science and Technology, (2021).
4.
Al-MallahM.H., AljizeeriA., AlharthiM.et al., Routine low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. European Heart Journal Supplements16(suppl B) (2014).
5.
KakA.C., SlaneyM. Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York, (1989).
6.
DemirkayaO. Reduction of noise and image artifacts in computed tomography by nonlinear filtration of projection images, SPIE Proceedings, (2001).
7.
ManducaA., YuL., TrzaskoJ.D.et al., Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. Medical Physics36(11) (2009), 4911–4919.
8.
BianZ., MaJ., HuangJ.et al., SR-NLM: A sinogram restoration induced non-local means image filtering for low-dose computed tomography. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics37(4) (2013), 293–303.
9.
CuiX., GuiZ., ZhangQ.et al., The statistical sinogram smoothing via adaptive-weighted total variation regularization for low-dose X-ray CT. Optik125(18) (2014), 5352–5356.
10.
XieQ., ZengD., ZhaoQ.et al., Robust low-dose CT sinogram preprocessing via exploiting noise-generating mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging36(12) (2017), 2487–2498.
11.
YuW., PengW., YinH.et al., Low-dose computed tomography reconstruction regularized by structural group Sparsity joined with gradient prior. Signal Processing182 (2021), 107945.
12.
ChrysostomouC. Sinogram denoise based on generative adversarial networks, 2020 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), (2020). DOI: 10.1109/nss/mic42677.2020.9507945.
13.
ZainulinaE., ChernyavskiyA., DylovD.V. No-reference denoising of low-dose CT projections, 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), (2021). DOI:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433825.
14.
PatwariM., GutjahrR., RaupachR.et al., Limited parameter denoising for low-dose x-ray computed tomography using Deep Reinforcement Learning. Medical Physics49(7) (2022), 4540–4553.
15.
BorsdorfA., RaupachR., FlohrT.et al., Wavelet based noise reduction in CT-images using correlation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging27(12) (2008), 1685–1703.
16.
ChenY., GaoD., NieC.et al., Bayesian statistical reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography using an adaptive-weighting nonlocal prior. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics33(7) (2009), 495–500.
17.
GreenM., MaromE.M., KiryatiN.et al., Efficient low-dose CT denoising by locally-consistent non-local means (LC-NLM), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2016), 423–431.
18.
HasanA.M., MelliA., WahidK.A.et al., Denoising low-dose CT images using multiframe blind source separation and Block Matching Filter. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences2(4) (2018), 279–287.
19.
HasanA.M., MohebbianM.R., WahidK.A.et al., Hybrid-collaborative noise2noise denoiser for low-dose CT images. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences5(2) (2021), 235–244.
20.
LewittR.M.Multidimensional digital image representations using generalized Kaiser–Bessel window functions. Journal of the Optical Society of America A7(10) (1990), 1834.
21.
ElbakriI.A., FesslerJ.A.Segmentation-free statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography with experimental validation. Physics in Medicine and Biology48(15) (2003), 2453–2477.
22.
ChenZ., ZhangQ., ZhouC.et al., Low-dose CT reconstruction method based on prior information of normal-dose image. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology28(6) (2020), 1091–1111.
23.
SidkyE.Y., PanX.Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Physics in Medicine and Biology53(17) (2008), 4777–4807.
24.
GaoH., YuH., OsherS.et al., Multi-energy CT based on a prior rank, intensity and sparsity model (prism). Inverse Problems27(11) (2011), 115012.
25.
XuQ., YuH., WangG.et al., Dictionary learning based low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction. Frontiers of Medical Imaging (2014), 99–119.
26.
DonohoD.L.Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory52(4) (2006), 1289–1306.
27.
ZhangY., MouX., WangG.et al., Tensor-based dictionary learning for Spectral CT reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging36(1) (2017), 142–154.
28.
LiuJ., HuY., YangJ.et al., 3D feature constrained reconstruction for low-dose CT imaging. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology28(5) (2018), 1232–1247.
29.
PengB., Jun KangX.W.et al., Convolutional sparse coding for compressed sensing CT reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging38(11) (2019), 2607–2619.
30.
LucasA., IliadisM., MolinaR.et al., Using deep neural networks for inverse problems in imaging: Beyond analytical methods. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine35(1), (2-18) 20–36.
31.
ChenH., ZhangY., KalraM.K.et al., Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging36(12) (2017), 524–2535.
32.
LiM., HsuW., XieX.et al., SACNN: Self-attention convolutional neural network for low-dose CT denoising with self-supervised Perceptual Loss Network. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging39(7) (2020), 2289–2301.
33.
HuangZ., ZhangJ., ZhangY.et al., Du-Gan: Generative adversarial networks with dual-domain u-net-based discriminators for low-dose CT denoising. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement71 (2022), 1–12.
34.
UnalM.O., ErtasM., YildirimI.An unsupervised reconstruction method for low-dose CT using deep generative regularization prior. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control75 (2022), 103598.
35.
SidkyE.Y., LorenteI., BrankovJ.G., PanX.Do CNNs solve the CT inverse problem?. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering68(6) (2021), 1799–1810.
36.
TianC., FeiL., ZhengW.et al., Deep learning on image denoising: An overview. Neural Networks131 (2020), 251–275.
37.
ZhuangL., Bioucas-DiasJ.M. Fast hyperspectral image denoising based on low rank and sparse representations, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), (2016). DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2016.7729474.
38.
Bioucas-DiasJ.M., NascimentoJ.M.P.Hyperspectral subspace identification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing46(8) (2008), 2435–2445.
39.
VenkatakrishnanS.V., BoumanC.A., WohlbergB. Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, (2013). DOI: 10.1109/globalsip.2013.6737048.
40.
TeodoroA., Bioucas-DiasJ., FigueiredoM.Sharpening hyperspectral images using plug-and-play priors. Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation (2017), 392–402.
41.
LjubenovicM., FigueiredoM.A. Blind image deblurring using class-adapted image priors, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), (2017). DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296329.
42.
DabovK., FoiA., KatkovnikV.et al., Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing16(8) (2007), 2080–2095.
43.
NejatiM., Samavi Reza SoroushmehrS.et al., Low-rank regularized collaborative filtering for image denoising, 2015
IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), (2015). DOI: 10.1109/icip.2015.7350895.
44.
ZoranD., WeissY. From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, (2011), 479–486.
45.
WangS., WuW., FengJ.et al., Low-dose spectral CT reconstruction based on image-gradient L0-norm and adaptive spectral PICCS. Physics in Medicine & Biology65(24) (2020), 245005.
46.
WangL., ZhangH., CaiA.et al., Image reconstruction algorithm based on inexact alternating direction total-variation minimization. Acta Physica Sinica62(19) (2013), 198701–198701.
47.
JungB.Book review: Phantoms and computational models in therapy, diagnosis and protection, ICRU report 48. Acta Radiologica35(2) (1994), 202.
