Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the difference in absorbed organ dose and image quality for head-neck CT angiography using organ dose modulation compared with 3D smart mA modulation in different body mass indices (BMIs) using an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.
METHODS:
Three hundred patients underwent head-neck CTA were equally divided into three groups: A (18.5 kg/m2≦BMI < 24.9 kg/m2), B (24.9 kg/m2≦BMI < 29.9 kg/m2) and C (29.9 kg/m2≦BMI≦34.9 kg/m2). The groups were randomly subdivided into two subgroups (n = 50): A1-A2, B1-B2 and C1-C2. The patients in subgroups A1, B1 and C1 underwent organ dose modulation with the ASiR-V algorithm, while other patients underwent 3D smart mA modulation. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of all head-neck CT angiography images were calculated. Images were then subjectively evaluated. Mean values of several indices including dose-length product (DLP) were computed. The DLP was converted to the effective dose (ED). SNR, CNR and ED in groups A, B, and C were compared in statistical data analysis.
RESULTS:
SNR, CNR, and subjective image scores show no statistical differences in three groups (P > 0.05). However, there is significant difference of ED values (P < 0.05) . For example, in subgroup A1 mean ED values are 15.30% and 23.66% lower than those in subgroup A2 at thyroid gland and eye lens, respectively. Similar patterns also exist in groups B (B1 vs. B2) and C (C1 vs. C2).
CONCLUSIONS:
Using organ dose modulation and applying the ASiR-V algorithm can more effectively reduce the radiation dose in head-neck CT angiography than using 3D smart mA modulation, while maintaining image quality. Thus, using organ-based dose modulation has the additional benefit of reducing dose to the thyroid gland and eye lens.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
