To compare image quality, radiation dose, and iodine intake of head-neck CT angiography (CTA) acquired by wide-detector with the gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) combination with low iodine intake or routine scan protocol.
METHODS:
Three hundred patients who had head-neck CTA were enrolled and divided into three groups according to their BMI values: group A (18.5 kg/m2 ≦ BMI <24.9 kg/m2), group B (24.9 kg/m2 ≦ BMI <29.9 kg/m2) and group C (29.9 kg/m2 ≦ BMI ≦ 34.9 kg/m2) with 100 patients in each group. Patients in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n = 50) namely, A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 and C2. The patients in subgroups A1, B1 and C1 underwent GSI with low iodine intake (270 mgI/ml, 50 ml) and combined with the ASiR-V algorithm. Other patients underwent three dimensional (3D) smart mA modulation with routine iodine intake (350 mgI/ml, 60 ml). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of all images were calculated after angiography. Images were then subjectively assessed using a 5-point scale. CT dose index of volume and dose-length product (DLP) was converted to the effective dose (ED) and then compared.
RESULTS:
The mean CT values, SNR, CNR and subjective image quality in subgroups A2, B2 and C2 are significantly lower than in subgroups A1, B1, and C1 (P < 0.01), respectively. The ED values in subgroup A1, B1, and C1 are 55.18%, 61.89%, and 69.64% lower than those in A2, B2, and C2, respectively (P < 0.01). The total iodine intakes in subgroups A1, B1, and C1 are 35.72% lower than those in subgroups A2, B2, and C2.
CONCLUSIONS:
The gemstone spectral imaging with monochromatic images at 53–57 keV combined with ASiR-V algorithm allows significant reduction in iodine load and radiation dose in head-neck CT angiography than those yielded in routine scan protocol. It also enhances signal intensity of head-neck CTA and maintains image quality.
YoonD.Y.ChoiC.S.KimK.H., et al., Multidetector-row CT angiography of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography, Am J Neuroradiol27(2) (2006), 370–377.
2.
ZhangW.L.LiM.ZhangB., et al., CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: Clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality, PLoS One8(12) (2013), e81486.
3.
WuT.H.HungS.C.SunJ.Y., et al., How far can the radiation dose be lowered in head CT with iterative reconstruction? Analysis of imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy, Eur Radiol23(9) (2013), 2612–2621.
4.
ChoE.S.ChungT.S.OhD.K., et al., Cerebral computed tomography angiography using a low tube voltage(80kVp) and a moderate concentration of iodine contrast material a quantitative and qualitative comparison with routine computed tomography angiography, Invest Radiol47(2) (2012), 142–147.
5.
BrennerD.J. and HallE.J., Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure, N Engl J Med357(22) (2007), 2277–2284.
6.
Smith-BindmanR.LipsonJ.MarcusR., et al., Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer, Arch Intern Med169(22) (2009), 2078–2086.
7.
SodicksonA.BaeyensP.F.AndrioleK.P., et al., Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults, Radiology251(1) (2009), 175–184.
8.
HenrikS.T., Recent hot topics in contrast media, European Radiology21(3) (2011), 492–495.
9.
StaculF.AartJ., et al., Contrast induced nephropathy: Updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines, European Radiology21(12) (2011), 2527–2541.
10.
MehranR. and NikolskyE., Contrast-induced nephropathy: Definition, epidemiology, and patients risk, Kidney Int Suppl4(100) (2006), S11–S15.
11.
MarenziG.AssanelliE.MaranaI., et al., N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty, N Engl J Med354(26) (2006), 2773–2782.
12.
GarciaS.KoB. and AdabagS., Contrast-induced nephropathy and risk of acute kidney injury and mortality after cardiac operations, Ann Thorac Surg94(3) (2012), 772–776.
13.
GrubergL.MintzG.S.MehranR., et al., The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency, J Am Coll Cardiol36(5) (2000), 1542–1548.
14.
DelesalleM.A.PontanaF.DuhamelA., et al., Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: Experience in 80 Patients Evaluated with Dual-Source, Dual-Energy CT, Radiology267(1) (2013), 256–266.
15.
ZhaoY.WuY.ZuoZ., et al., CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index with iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging in different body mass index: Image quality and radiation dose, Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology25(1) (2017), 79–91.
16.
ZhaoY.SuoH.WuY., et al., Noise indices adjusted to body mass index and an iterative reconstruction algorithm maintain image quality on low-dose contrast-enhanced liver CT, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology25(4) (2017), 597–611.
17.
VollmarS.V. and KalenderW.A., Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: A comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tubecurrent-modulated CT examinations, Eur Radiol18(8) (2008), 1674–1682.
18.
KuboT.LinP.J.StillerW., et al., Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A review, Eur J Radiol83(10) (2014), 1953–1961.
19.
McColloughC.H.BruesewitzM.R.KoflerJ.M.Jr, CT dose reduction and dose management tools: Overview of available options, Radiographics26(2) (2006), 503–512.
20.
TackD., Radiation dose optimization in thoracic imaging, JBR-BTR93(1) (2010), 15–19.
21.
WangF.ZhangY.XueH., et al., Combined use of iterative reconstruction and monochromatic imaging in spinal fusion CT images, Acta Radiol58(1) (2017), 62–69.
22.
ZhaoY.ZuoZ.ChengS., et al., CT pulmonary angiography using organ dose modulation with an iterative reconstruction algorithm and 3D Smart mA in different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose, La Radiologia Medica123(9) (2018), 676–685.
23.
KwonH.ChoJ.OhJ.KimD., et al., The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: Comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique, Br J Radiol88(1054) (2015), 20150463.
24.
CaiW.HuC.H.WangX.M., et al., Applied research of “quadri-low” combined with automatic tube current modulation and iterative model reconstruction technology in head and neck CT angiography, Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi98 (2018), 30–35.
25.
International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (publication no. 103), Ann ICRP37 (2007), 2–4.
26.
ChristnerJ.A.KoflerJ.M. and McColloughC.H., Estimating effective dose for CT using dose–length product compared with using organ doses: Consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning, American Journal of Roentgenology194(4) (2010), 881–889.
27.
MaG.YuY.DuanH., et al., Subtraction CT angiography in head and neck with low radiation and contrast dose dual-energy spectral CT using rapid kV-switching technique, Br J Radiol91(1086) (2018), 20170631.
28.
ChenG.ZhangL.SchoepfJ., et al., Radiation dose and image quality of 70kVp cerebral CT angiography with optimized sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: Comparison with 120kVp cerebral CT angiography, Eur Radiol25(5) (2015), 1453–1463.
29.
CaiW.HuC.HuS., et al., Feasibility study of iterative model reconstruction combined with low tube voltage, low iodine load, and low iodine delivery rate in craniocervical CT angiography, Clinical Radiology73(2) (2018), 217.e1–6.
30.
BehrendtF.F.SchmidtB.PlumhansC., et al., Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography: Effect on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography, Invest Radiol44(1) (2009), 1–6.
31.
ThomsenH.S., How to avoid CIN: Guidelines from the euroean society of urogenital radiology, Nephrol Dial Transplant20(Suppl 1) (2005), i18–i22.
32.
AbujudehH.H. and GeeM.S., In emergency situations, should serum creatinine be checked in all patients before performing second contrast CT examinations within 24 hours, J Am Coll Radiol6(4) (2009), 268–273.
33.
GeenenR.W.KingmaH.J. and van der MolenA.J., Contrast-induced nephropathy: Pharmacology, pathophysiology and prevention, Insights Into Imaging4(6) (2013), 811–820.
34.
MaG.YuY.DuanH., et al., Subtraction CT angiography in head and neck with low radiation and contrast dose dual-energy spectral CT using rapid kV-switching technique, Br J Radiol91(1086) (2018), 20170631.
35.
DarwishT., An evidence based approach to minimise contrast induced nephropathy, N Z Med J122(1299) (2009), 39–41.
36.
XieJ.JiangM.LinY., et al., Effect of alprostadil on the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials, Angiology70(7) (2019), 594–612.
37.
WangH.XuL.ZhangN., et al., Coronary computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery bypass grafts: Comparison between low-concentration iodixanol 270 and iohexol 350, J Comput Assist Tomogr39(1) (2015), 112–118.
