CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index values with an iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging using different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January 28, 2017
CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index values with an iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging using different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in imaging quality and radiation dose in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) by using fast-kV switching dual energy CT imaging and 3D Smart mA modulation at different body mass indices (BMIs) and at different noise index (NI) values with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) algorithm.
METHODS: Four hundred patients who underwent CTPA were equally divided into two groups: A (18.5 kg/m2 ≦ BMI <24.9 kg/m2) and B (24.9 kg/m2 ≦ BMI ≦ 4.9 kg/m2). The groups were randomly subdivided into four subgroups (n = 50): A1-A4 and B1-B4. The patients in subgroups A1 and B1 underwent fast-kV switching dual energy CT imaging. The other patients underwent 3D Smart mA modulation with the ASIR algorithm at NI values 26, 36, and 46 for A2/B2, A3/B3, and A4/B4, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of all images were calculated after CTPA. Images were then subjectively evaluated using a 5-point scale. The volume CT dose index and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded and their means calculated. The DLP was converted to the effective dose (ED).
RESULTS: In group A, the SNR, CNR, and subjective image scores showed no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The ED in subgroup A4 was 67.12% and 31.53% lower than that in A1 and A2, respectively. In group B, the variables showed no significant differences between the subgroups B3, B1, and B2 (P > 0.05). The ED in subgroup B3 was 50.12% and 35.95% lower than that in B1 and B2, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Setting different NI values according to BMIs and applying the ASIR algorithm can more effectively reduce the radiation dose in CTPA than in fast-kV switching dual energy CT, while maintaining image quality. Imaging may be performed at NI = 46 in patients with lower BMI (group A) and at NI = 36 in patients with higher BMI (group B).
ZamboniG.A., GuarigliaS., BonfanteA., et al., Low voltage CTPA for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, European Journal of Radiology81 (2012), e580–e584.
2.
HeyerC.M., MohrP.S., LemburgS.P., PetersS.A., et al., Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100-or 120kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study, Radiology245 (2007), 577–583.
3.
Winer-MuramH.T., RydbergJ., JohnsonM.S., et al., Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: Evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary angiography, Radiology233 (2004), 806–815.
MettlerF.A.Jr, ThomadsenB.R., BhargavanM., et al., Medical radiation exposure in the US in 2006: Preliminary results, Health Phys95 (2008), 502–507.
6.
SpielmannA.L., NelsonR.C., LowryC.R., et al., Liver: Single breath-hold dynamic subtraction CT with multi-detector row helical technology feasibility study, Radiology222(1) (2002), 278–283.
7.
ApfaltrerP., SudarskiS., SchneiderD., et al., Value of monoenergetic low-kV dual energy CT datasets for improved image quality of CT pulmonary angiography, European Journal of Radiology83 (2014), 322–328.
8.
SinghS., KalraM.K., Shenoy-BhangleA.S., et al., Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT, Radiology263 (2012), 537–546.
9.
HeyerC.M., MohrP.S., LemburgS.P., et al., Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study, Radiology245 (2007), 577–583.
10.
GhettiC., OrtenziaO. and SerreliG., CT iterative reconstruction in image space: A phantom study, Phys Med28 (2012), 161–165.
11.
HaraA.K., PadenR.G., SilvaA.C., et al., Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body adiation dose at CT: Feasibility study, AJR Am J Roentgenol193 (2009), 764–771.
12.
YouJ., DaiY., HuangN., et al., Low-dose computed tomography with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and low tube voltage in craniocervical computed tomographic angiography: Impact of body mass index, J Computed Assist Tomogr39(5) (2015), 774–780.
13.
PrakashP., KalraM.K., KambadakoneA.K., et al., Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique, Investigative Radiology45(4) (2010), 201–210.
14.
BongartzG., GoldingS.J. and JurikA.J., European guidelines for multi slice computed tomography: Report EUR 16262 EN 2004. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2004.
15.
Viteri-RamírezG., García-LallanaA., Sim_on-YarzaI., et al., Low radiation and low-contrast dose pulmonary CT angiography: Comparison of 80kVp/60ml and 100kVp/80ml protocols, Clinical Radiology67 (2012), 833–839.
16.
SpielmannA.L., NelsonR.C., LowryC.R., et al., Liver: Single breath-hold dynamic subtraction CT with multi-detector row helical technology feasibility study, Radiology222(1) (2002), 278–283.
17.
YuanR., ShumanW.P., EarlsJ.P., et al., Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonary angiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: Comparison with standard CT pulmonary angiography- a prospective randomized trial, Radiology262 (2012), 290–297.
18.
Schueller-WeidekammC., Schaefer-ProkopC.M., WeberM., et al., CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: Improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings, Radiology241 (2006), 899–907.
19.
FanousR., KashaniH., JimenezL., et al., Image quality and radiation dose of pulmonary CT angiography performed using 100 and 120 kVp, AJR199(11) (2012), 990–996.
20.
BehrendtF.F., SchmidtB., PlumhansC., et al., Image fusion irenergy computed tomography: effect on contrast enhance signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed angiography, Invest Radiol44 (2009), l–6.
21.
XueH., ZhangL., ChenZ. and LiL., A correction method for dual energy liquid CT image reconstruction with metallic containers, J Xray Sci Technol20(3) (2012), 301–316.
22.
ZhaoL.-Q., HeW., LiJ.-Y., et al., Improving image quality in portal venography with spectral CT imaging, Eur Radiol20(6) (2012), 1677–1681.
23.
ZhuZ., ZhaoX.-M., ZhaoY.-F., et al., Feasibility study of using gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) for reducing radiation and iodine contrast dose in abdominal CT patients with high BMI values, PLoS One10(6) (2015), e0129201.
24.
BoosJ., AissaJ., LanzmanR.S., et al., CT angiography of the aorta using 80kVp in combination with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose, J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol7 (2016). DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485
25.
MacDougallR.D., KleinmanP.L. and CallahanM.J., Size-based protocol optimization using automatic tube current modulation and automatic kV selection in computed tomography, J Appl Clin Med Phys17(1) (2016), 5756.
26.
AlmutairiA., SunZ., Al SafranZ., et al., Optimal scanning protocols for dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial stents: An in vitro phantom study, Int J Mol Sci16(5) (2015), 11531–11549.
27.
HuJ. and ZhaoX., A practical material decomposition method for x-ray dual spectral computed tomography, J Xray Sci Technol24(3) (2016), 407–425.
28.
DongJ., WangX., JiangX., et al., Low-contrast agent dose dual-energy CT monochromatic imaging in pulmonary angiography versus routine CT, J Comput Assist Tomogr37(4) (2013), 618–625.
29.
LeeS.H., KimM.J., YoonC.S., et al., Radiation dose reduction with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for chest CT in children: An intra-individual comparison, Eur J Radiol81(9) (2012), e938–e943.
30.
VardhanabhutiV., LoaderR.J., MitchellG.R., et al., Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms, AJR Am J Roentgenol200(3) (2013), 545–552.
31.
HagueC.J., KrowchukN., AlhassanD., et al., Qualitative and quantitative assessment of smoking-related lung disease: Effect of iterative reconstruction on low-dose computed tomographic examinations, J Thorac Imaging29(6) (2014), 350–356.
32.
YehB.M., ShepherdJ.A., WangZ.J., et al., Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen, AJR Am J Roentgenol193(1) (2009), 47–54.
33.
WangF., ZhangY., XueH., et al., Combined use of iterative reconstruction and monochromatic imaging in spinal fusion CT images, Acta Radiol25 (2016). DOI: 10.1177/0284185116631182
34.
ShiY.J., ZhangX.P., SunY.S., et al., spectral CT in the demonstration of the pancreatic arteries and their branches: A comparison with conventional CT, Medicine (Baltimore)95(7) (2016), e2823.
35.
XinL., YangX., HuangN., et al., The initial experience of the upper abdominal CT angiography using low-concentration contrast medium on dual energy spectral CT, Abdom Imaging40(7) (2015), 2894–2899.
36.
DelesalleM.A., PontanaF., DuhamelA., et al., Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: Experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT, Radiology267(1) (2013), 256–266.
