Since body mass index (BMI) affects medical imaging quality or noise due to penetration of the radiation through bodies with varying sizes, this study aims to investigate and determine the optimal BMI-adjusted noise index (NI) setting on the contrast-enhanced liver CT scans obtained using 3D Smart mA technology with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR 2.0) algorithm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A total of 320 patients who had contrast-enhanced liver CT scans were divided into two equal-sized groups: A (18.5 kg/m2≤BMI<24.9 kg/m2) and B (24.9 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤34.9 kg/m2). The two groups were randomly divided into four subgroups with an NI of 11, 13, 15, and 17. All images were reconstructed with 50% ASIR 2.0. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated after the late arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases were completed. Images were evaluated by two radiologists using a subjective 0 –5 scale. Mean CT dose index of volume, dose-length product, and effective dose (ED) were calculated and compared using one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS:
In group A, the best-quality images obtained at the lowest ED were scanned at an NI of 15 in the late arterial phase, and at an NI of 17 in the portal venous and equilibrium phases. In group B, the best results were obtained at an NI of 13 in the late arterial phase, and at an NI of 15 in the portal venous and equilibrium phases.
CONCLUSION:
Adjusting NI and iterative reconstruction algorithm based on body mass index can help improve image quality on contrast-enhanced liver CT scans, even at low radiation dose.
MettlerF.A., ThomadsenB.R., BhargavanM., et al., Medical radiation exposure in the US in 2006: Preliminary results, Health Phys95 (2008), 502–507.
2.
Berrington de GonzálezA., MaheshM., KimK.P., et al., Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007, Arch Intern Med169 (2009), 2071–2077.
3.
KalraM.K., MaherM.M., TothT.L., et al., Strategies for CT radiation dose optimisation, Radiology230 (2004), 619–628.
4.
HeyerC.M., MohrP.S., LemburgS.P., et al., Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: Prospective randomized study, Radiology245 (2007), 577–583.
5.
HaraA.K., PadenP.G., SilvaA.C., et al., Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: Feasibility study, Am J Roentgenol193 (2009), 764–771.
6.
YouJ., DaiY., HuangN., et al., Low-dose computed tomography with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and low tube voltage in craniocervical computed tomographic angiography: Impact of Body Mass Index, J Computed Assist Tomogr39 (2015), 774–780.
7.
ChenJ., JinE., HeW., et al., Combining automatic tube current modulation with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for low-dose chest CT screening, PLoS one9 (2014), 1–7.
8.
TanW., ZhanS., YangS., et al., Reduction of radiation dose in the spiral CT scan of the lumbar spine by the combined use of body mass index (BMI) and automatic exposure control (AEC), J Xray Sci Technol22 (2014), 697–706.
9.
FleischmannD. and KamayaA., Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: The current state of the art, Radiol Clin North Am47 (2009), 13–26.
10.
HurS., LeeJ.M., KimS.J., et al., 80-kVp CT using iterative reconstruction in image space algorithm for the detection of hyper vascular hepatocellular carcinoma: Phantom and initial clinical experience, Korean J Radiol13 (2012), 152–164.
11.
VoldersD., BolsA., HaspeslaghM., et al., Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: Comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases, Radiology269 (2013), 469–474.
12.
PadoleA., SinghS., LiraD., et al., Assessment of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical,and model-based iterative reconstruction for reduced dose abdominal computed tomography, J Comput Assist Tomogr39(4) (2015), 462–467.
13.
ChristnerJ.A., KoflerJ.M. and McColloughC.H., Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: Consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protectionpublication103 or dual-energy scanning, Am J Roentgenol194 (2010), 881–889.
14.
SpielmannA.L., NelsonR.C., LowryC.R., et al., Liver: Single breath-hold dynamic subtraction CT with multi-detector row helical technology feasibility study, Radiology222 (2002), 278–83.
15.
GuimarãesL.S., FletcherJ.G., HarmsenW.S., et al., Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: Relationship between patient size, image noise, and image quality, Radiology257 (2010), 732–742.
16.
MarinD., NelsonR.C., SchinderaS.T., et al., Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: Improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistic alterative reconstruction algorithm-initial clinical experience, Radiology254 (2010), 145–153.
17.
YuM.H., LeeJ.M., YoonJ.H., et al., Low tube voltage intermediate tube current liver MDCT: Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma, Am J Roentgenol201 (2013), 23–32.
ChoE.S., YuJ.S., et al., CT angiography of the renal arteries: Comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA, Genitourin Imaging199 (2012), 96–102.
20.
KesslerR., HegenscheidK., FleckS., et al., Patient body weight-tailored contrast medium injection protocol for the craniocervical vessels: A prospective computed tomography study, PLoS One9 (2014), e88867.
21.
KornA., FenchelM., BenderB., et al., Iterative reconstruction in head CT: Image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection, Am J Neuroradiol33 (2012), 218–224.
22.
ZhaoY.X., SuoH.N., ZuoZ.W., et al., A Comparison of the image quality and radiation dose with routine computed tomography and the latest gemstone spectral imaging combination of different scanning protocols in computed tomography angiography of the kidney, J Comput Assist Tomogr40 (2016), 632–640.
23.
ZhangW.L., LiM., ZhangB., et al., CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: Clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality, PLoS One8 (2013), e81486.
24.
ZhaoY.X., ZuoZ.W., SuoH.N., et al., A comparison of the image quality and radiation dose using 100-kVp combination of different noise index and 120-kVp in CT pulmonary angiography, J Comput Assist Tomogr40 (2016), 784–9029.
25.
WangX., HeW., ChenJ., et al., Feasibility study of radiation dose reduction in adult female pelvic CT Scan with low tube-voltage and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, Korean J Radiol16 (2015), 1047–1055.
26.
LöveA., SiemundR., HöglundP., et al., Hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm improves image quality in craniocervical CT angiography, Am J Roentgenol201 (2013), W861–W866.
27.
LiX., SegarsW.P. and SameiE., The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology:A theoretical investigation, Phys Med Biol59 (2014), 4525–4548.
28.
HardyA., BostaniM., McMillanK., et al., TU-H-207A-08: Estimating radiation dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams using tube current modulation, Med Phys43 (2016), 3773.
29.
GervaiseA., NauletP., BeuretF., et al., Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: Impact of body mass index, Am J Roentgenol202 (2014), 553–560.
30.
SoenenO., BalliauwC., OyenR., et al., Dose and image quality in low-dose CT for urinary stone disease: Added value of automatic tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction techniques, Radiat Prot Dosimetry (2016), 1–8.
31.
ZhaoY., WuY., ZuoZ., et al., CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index values with an iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging using different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose, J Xray Sci Technol25 (2017), 79–91.
32.
ZhaoY., WuY., ZuoZ., et al., Application of low concentration contrast medium in spectral CT imaging for CT portal venography, J Xray Sci Technol25 (2017), 135–143.
33.
AmatoE., AseroG., LeottaS., et al., Influence of the X-ray beam quality on the dose increment in CT with iodinated contrast medium, J Xray Sci Technol24 (2016), 267–278.
34.
KhawajaR.D., SinghS., BlakeM., et al., Ultralow-dose abdominal computed tomography: Comparison of 2 iterative reconstruction techniques in a prospective clinical study, J Comput Assist Tomogr39 (2015), 489–498.
35.
DebatinM. and HesserJ., Accurate low-dose iterative CT reconstruction from few projections by generalized anisotropic total variation minimization for industrial CT, J Xray Sci Technol23 (2015), 701–726.
36.
KuboT., LinP.J., StillerW., et al., Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A review, Am J Roentgenol190 (2008), 335–343.
37.
ZhaoY.X., ZuoZ.W., SuoH.N., et al., CT pulmonary angiography using automatic tube current modulation combination with different noise index with iterative reconstruction algorithm in different body mass index: Image quality and radiation dose, Acad Radiol23 (2016), 1513–1520.
38.
VardhanabhutiV., RiordanR.D., MitchellG.R., et al., Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: Clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients, Invest Radiol49 (2014), 209–216.
