Mercury used in dental amalgams constitutes a significant source of chronic exposure to this heavy metal among dentists. Thus, the safety of dental amalgam remains a controversial issue despite its long history of use. In Morocco, most studies about dental mercury were mainly focused on the environmental risk related to the management of mercury-contaminated waste.
OBJECTIVE:
In order to evaluate the occupational exposure to mercury among liberal dentists practicing in two Moroccan regions, a multidimensional statistical approach was used to analyze the collected data. The main objective was to help establishing a targeted prevention plan aiming to reduce the mercury exposure among Moroccan dentists.
METHODS:
Fifteen variables from 146 dentists were elected for a three-step classification procedure: a multiple correspondence analysis followed by a hierarchical ascendant clustering consolidated by the k-Means algorithm.
RESULTS:
Three homogenous clusters were identified. The most important one includes 57.5% of the population as well as the majority of the risky factors. The characterization of these clusters allows proposing concise guidelines for a targeted preventive plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
A real mercurial risk has been observed in the studied population. However, its impact on health as well as the efficiency of simple preventive recommendations remains to be unveiled.
NagpalN, BettiolSS, Isham, HoangH, CrocombeA. A review of mercury exposure and health of dental personnel, Saf Health Work. 2017;8:1–10.
2.
Jirau-ColónH, González-ParrillaL, Martinez-JiménezJ, AdamW, Jiménez-VelezB. Rethinking the dental amalgam dilemma: An integrated toxicological approach, Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(1036):1–13.
3.
HommeKG, KernJK, HaleyBE, GeierDA, KingPG, SykesLK, et al. New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe, Biometals. 2014;27:19–24.
4.
FisherJ, VarenneB, NarvaezD, VickersC. The Minamata Convention and the phase down of dental amalgam, Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(6):436–8.
5.
ManyaniA, RhalemN, EnnibiO, SoulaymaniA, HmimouR, Soulaymani-BencheikhR. Gestion des déchets médicaux et pharmaceutiques produits au niveau des cabinets dentaires privés et publics des provinces de Rabat et Kénitra, Toxicol Anal Clin. 2019;31(2, Supplement):S68–9.
6.
ChalaS, SawadogoA, SakoutM, AbdallaouiF. Gestion des déchets d’amalgame dentaire par les chirurgiens-dentistes au Burkina Faso et au Maroc, Odontostomatol Trop. 2012;35(140):31–7.
7.
AttiyaN, FattahiR, El-HaidaniA, LahrachN, AmarouchM-Y, Filali-ZegzoutiY. Exposition au mercure et état de santé des médecins dentistes de deux régions du centre du Maroc: Enquête transversale descriptive. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;36:110.
8.
HussonF, LêS, PagèsJ. Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017, p. 248.
9.
FlyntA, DeanN. A survey of popular R packages for cluster analysis, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2016;41(2):205–25.
10.
HussonF, JosseJ, PagèsJ. Principal component methods – hierarchical clustering – partitional clustering: Why would we need choose for visualizing data?Appl Math Dep. 2010;1–17.
11.
KangH. The prevention and handling of the missing data, Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(5):402–6.
12.
JosseJ, HussonF. missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis, Journal of Statistical Software. 2016;70(1):1–31.
13.
StavsethMR, Thomas ClausenT, RøislienJ. How handling missing data may impact conclusions: A comparison of six different imputation methods for categorical questionnaire data, SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:1–12.
14.
SchachV, JahanbakhtS, LivardjaniF, FleschF, JaegerA, HaikelY. Le risque mercuriel dans les cabinets dentaires: Histoire ancienne ou futur proche? INRS: Documents Pour le Médecin du Travail (2003;93(1):7–23.
15.
BouardB, SawickiB, ChoukrounP, DurandG, BaronR, DewitteJ-D. Exposition professionnelle au mercure des assistants dentaires, INRS: Documents Pour le Médecin du Travail. 2003;93(1):25–34.
ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental mercury hygiene recommendations, JADA. 2003;134:1498–9.
18.
BanaeeS, ClaiborneDM, Akpinar-ElciM. Occupational health practices among dental care professionals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, Work. 2021;68(4):993–1000. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205319.
19.
RubinDB. Inference and missing data, Biometrika. 1976;63:581–92.
20.
GrahamJW. Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world, Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549–76.
21.
ChengX, CookD, HofmannH. Visually exploring missing values in multivariable data using a graphical user interface, Journal of Statistical Software. 2015;68(6):1–23.
22.
LêS, JosseJ, HussonF. FactoMineR: An r package for multivariate analysis, Journal of Statistical Software. 2008;25(1):1–18.
23.
JulieJ. Contribution to missing values & principal component methods. Statistics [stat]. Université Paris Sud -Orsay. 2016. tel-01573493. Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01573493
24.
Warns-PetitE, MorignatE, ArtoisM, CalavasD. Unsupervised clustering of wildlife necropsy data for syndromic surveillance, BMC Vet Res. 2010;6(1):56.
25.
LangworthS, SällstenG, BarregårdL, CynkierI, LindML, SödermanE. Exposure to mercury vapor and impact on health in the dental profession in Sweden, J Dent Res. 1997;76(7):1397–404.
26.
MartinMD, NalewayC, ChouHN. Factors contributing to mercury exposure in dentists, J Am Assoc. 1995;126(11):1502–11.
27.
PaksoyCS, GörgünS, NalçaciR, YagbasanA. Assessment of blood mercury levels in practicing Turkish clinicians, dental students, and dental nurses, Quintessence Int. 2008;39(4):173–8.
28.
GoodrichJM, ChouHN, GruningerSE, FranzblauA, BasuN. Exposure of dental professionals to elemental mercury and methylmercury, J Expo Sci Environ Eidemiol. 2016;26(1):78–85.
29.
PowellLV, JohnsonGH, BalesDJ. Mercury release during insertion and removal of dental amalgam, Oper Dent. 1994;19(2):70–4.
30.
ParsellDE, KarnsL, BuchananWT, JohnsonRB. Mercury release during autoclave sterilization of amalgam, J Dent Educ. 1996;60(5):453–8.
31.
Bagheri HosseinabadiM, KhanjaniN, MobarakeMD, ShirkhanlooH. Neuropsychological effects of long-term occupational exposure to mercury among chloralkali workers, Work. 2020;66(3):491–498. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203194.
32.
NgimC, NgimAD. Health and safety in the dental clinic – Hygiene regulations for use of elemental mercury in the protection of rights, safety and well-being of the patients, workers and the environment, Singapore Dent J. 2013;34(1):19–24.
33.
FisherJ, VarenneB, NarvaezD, VickersC. The Minamata Convention and the phase down of dental amalgam, Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(6):436–8.
34.
SawairF, HassonehY, JamlehA, Al-Rabab’ahM. Observance of proper mercury hygiene practices by Jordanian general dental practitioners, Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2010;23(1):47–54.
35.
AfifyM, ArafaA, AllaaTaherH. Dentist’s attitude toward mercury hygiene practice and its correlation with urinary mercury levels among Egyptian dentists, Egypt J Occup Med. 2011;35(1):143–56.
36.
BechirA, BechirE, SirbuR. The necessity to implement safety measures to prevent mercury pollution, determined by specific dental activities, Jepe. 2012;13(1):178–89.
37.
RaghavendraSS, RanadiveN. Mercury hygiene practices followed in dental clinics in pune: A survey, World J Dent. 2013;4(2):92–5.
38.
DecharatS, PhethuaylukP, ManeelokS, ThepaksornP. Determination of mercury exposure among dental health workers in nakhon si thammarat province, thailand, J Toxicol. 2014)401012.
39.
MakanjuolaJO, EkowmenhenhenUI, EnoneLL, UmesiDC, OgundanaOM, ArotibaGT. Mercury hygiene and biomedical waste management practices among dental health-care personnel in public hospitals in Lagos State, Nigeria, Afr Health Sci. 2021;21(1):457–69.
