BACKGROUND: Increasingly, evidence shows that prolonged sedentary behavior factors into the health equation on its own, unrelated to weight and periods of intense exercise. In schools, students are required to sit for long periods of time.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reminders (via a wearable device) to change posture, can change students’ behavior and impact their subjective wellbeing.
PARTICIPANTS: Ten students of ages 17 to 18 years at a public high school in Bellevue, Washington, USA.
METHODS: To monitor students’ behaviors, specially designed wearable devices recorded periods of sitting, standing and moving of participants throughout the school day for one week. During the second week of the study session, reminders were given via the devices providing vibration feedback after 20 minutes of uninterrupted sitting. Subjective wellbeing was evaluated through a daily questionnaire.
RESULTS: The reminders given by the devices were effective in changing students’ behavior. Students took significantly more breaks from sitting during the week with reminders. However, changes in subjective well-being were inconclusive.
CONCLUSION: The reminders were effective in changing students’ behavior, demonstrating that behavior can be changed through individual feedback. Further study is required to explore benefits of such breaks on students’ subjective wellbeing, but other studies suggest that such breaks improve their physical health.
LevineJA, McCradySK, Lanningham-FosterLM, KanePH, FosterRC, ManoharCU. The role of free-living daily walking in human weight gain and obesity. Diabetes2008;57(3):548–54.
3.
LevineJA, McCradySK, BoyneS, SmithJ, CargillK, ForresterT. Non-exercise physical activity in agricultural and urban people. Urban Stud2011;48(11):2417–27.
DunstanDW, HowardB, HealyGN, OwenN. Too much sitting –a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract2012;97(3):368–76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.05.020
6.
VeermanJL, HealyGN, CobiacLJ, VosT, WinklerEAH, OwenN, et al. Television viewing time and reduced life expectancy: A life table analysis. Br J Sports Med2012;46:1144. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2011.085662
PedersenSJ, CooleyPD, MainsbridgeC. An e-health intervention designed to increase workday energy expenditure by reducing prolonged occupational sitting habits. Work2014;49(2):289–95. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131644
9.
MyersN. Block scheduling that gets results. Principal2008;20–23.
10.
GullattDE. Block scheduling: The effects on curriculum and student productivity. NASSP Bulletin2006;90(3):250–66. doi: 10.1177/0192636506292382
11.
LawrenceWW, McPhersonDD. A comparative study of block scheduling and traditional scheduling on academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology2000;27(3):178–82.
12.
SandersMJ. Designing classroom routines to promote physical activity in children. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society2014;58(1).
13.
AminianS, HincksonEA, StewartT. Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting. Building Research & Information2015;43(5):631–45. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1058093
14.
DunstanDW, KingwellBA, LarsenR, HealyG, CerinE, HamiltonMT, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care2012;35(5):976–83. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1931
15.
HensonJ, YatesT, BiddleSJH, EdwardsonCL, KhuntiK, WilmotEG, et al. Associations of objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with markers of cardiometabolic health. Diabetologia2013;56(5):1012–20. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2845-9
16.
MatthewsCE, GeorgeSM, MooreSC, BowlesHR, BlairA, ParkY, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr2012;95(2):437–45. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.019620
17.
OwenN, HealyGN, MatthewsCE, DunstanDW. Too much sitting: The population-health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2010;38(3):105–13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2
