This study focuses on assessing the mismatch between office furniture and anthropometric measures among office staff and the impact of various workstation components on the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms.
Objective
The object of this study was to determine the appropriateness of the office furniture for their users in the office environments considering ergonomic principles.
Methods
The study sample consisted of 196 computer users with the office job. The prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms was assessed using a standard questionnaire. To determine risk factors of workstation related musculoskeletal symptoms, a quick strain evaluation method, Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA), was used. Moreover, the appropriateness of office furniture and anthropometric dimensions of office staff were evaluated based on defined equations.
Results
Based on the ROSA score, men have significantly more inappropriate workstations than women (p < 0.048) which is mainly caused by an inappropriate chair and monitor height. However, based on the evaluation of the anthropometric measures against the dimensions of office furniture, the most mismatch was seen among women (p < 0.05). Also, the most mismatch was calculated for seat height (SH), seat depth (SD), and seat backrest height (SBH).
Conclusions
In general, the results of this study showed that in many cases, office employee's work in ergonomically inappropriate workstations, and although different evaluation methods show differences between the conditions of their workstations, in general, both men and women work in poor ergonomic workstations. This emphasize the necessity of designing an ergonomic and adjustable workstation according to the anthropometric dimensions of computer users.
PajoohniaMRoveshtiMMValipourF, et al.Ergonomic assessment of risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders of the administrative staff in military center using ROSA. Paramed Sci Mil Health2022; 16: 1–9.
2.
BernardB. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and lower back. 1997, pp.97–141.
3.
MianehsazETabatabaeiMKashaniMM, et al.Evaluating musculoskeletal disorders and their ergonomic risk factors among office workers of a large public hospital in Iran. Int Arch Health Sci2022; 9: 35–40.
4.
ErTSTajurahimNANMahmoodS, et al.Ergonomics assessment among staff at the faculty of engineering technology using ROSA technique. Hum Factors Ergon J (HFEJ)2023; 8: 57–79.
5.
TremblayMSLeBlancAGKhoME, et al.Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2011; 8: 1–22.
6.
ReddyJ. Evaluation of library furniture and anthropometric characteristics of St. Mary’s students for ergonomics design of table and chair. Int J Res Stud Sci Eng Technol2015; 2: 27–32.
7.
LinY-CWangM-JJWangEM. The comparisons of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in east Asia. Appl Ergon2004; 35: 173–178.
8.
HabibiESadeghiNMansouriF, et al.Comparison of Iranian student's anthropometric information and American and English standards. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci2012; 10: 22–30.
9.
SadeghiFMazloumiAKazemiZ. An anthropometric data bank for the Iranian working population with ethnic diversity. Appl Ergon2015; 48: 95–103.
10.
AiyegbusiAIGbiriCAOyeniranTO, et al.Mismatch between school furniture dimensions and anthropometric parameters is a risk for spinal deformities in secondary school students in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Bull Faculty Phys Ther2023; 28: 34.
11.
MotamedzadeMHassan BeigiMMahjoobH. Design and development of an ergonomic chair for Iranian office workers. J Adv Med Biomed Res2009; 17: 45–52.
12.
RiyahiAPooryamaneshLTanhaF, et al.Investigating the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders caused by work and related factors in administrative staff of education in Arak city in 2016, a descriptive study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci2019; 17: 913–924.
13.
Sabzevari-RadR. Investigation of ergonomic Status and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders of the administrative staff in a military center. J Mil Med2023; 25: 1766–1773.
14.
ChineduOOHenryATNeneJJ, et al.Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among office workers in higher education institutions: a cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci2020; 30: 715–724.
15.
PutsaBJalayondejaWMekhoraK, et al.Factors associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers: a cross-sectional study 2017 to 2020. BMC Public Health2022; 22: 1–11.
16.
KuorinkaIJonssonBKilbomA, et al.Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon1987; 18: 233–237.
17.
RafeemaneshEYazdiDKAhmadifarM, et al.Study of musculoskeletal disorders prevalence and ergonomic conditions by ROSA in administrative staff of Mashhad university of medical sciences. Int J Bus Manag2019; 4: 82–89.
18.
RodriguesMSASonneMAndrewsDM, et al.Rapid office strain assessment (ROSA): cross cultural validity, reliability and structural validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version. Appl Ergon2019; 75: 143–154.
19.
SonneMAndrewsDM. The rapid office strain assessment (ROSA): validity of online worker self-assessments and the relationship to worker discomfort. Occup Ergon2012; 10: 83–101.
20.
ParvezMRahmanATasnimN. Ergonomic mismatch between students anthropometry and university classroom furniture. Theor Issues Ergon Sci2019; 20: 603–631.
21.
IsapkaAIOmorodionOA. The mismatch of students anthropometric data with ergonomic designs of learning workstation is a risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Sci2019; 8: 105–111.
22.
CastellucciHCatalánMArezesP, et al.Evidence for the need to update the Chilean standard for school furniture dimension specifications. Int J Ind Ergon2016; 56: 181–188.
23.
KahyaE. Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures of university students. Int JInd Ergon2019; 74: 102864.
24.
DianatIKarimiMAHashemiAA, et al.Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Appl Ergon2013; 44: 101–108.
25.
CastellucciHArezesPMolenbroekJ. Equations for defining the mismatch between students and school furniture: a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon2015; 48: 117–126.
26.
KibriaMGRafiquzzamanM. Ergonomic computer workstation design for university teachers in Bangladesh. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng2019; 13: 91–103.
27.
BiswasBZahidFBAraR, et al. (eds). Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measurements of Bangladeshi primary school students. In: International conference on mechanical, industrial and energy engineering, 2014.
28.
BaharampourSNazariJDianatI, et al.Student's body dimensions in relation to classroom furniture. Health Promot Perspect2013; 3: 165.
29.
MazloumiAPourbabakiRSamieiS. Studying factors influencing eye indicators of computer users: a systematic review. J Health Saf Work2019; 9: 231–240.
30.
MazloumiASamieiSPourbabakiR. Experimental study on the effect of monitor height on eye indices influencing eye discomfort among VDT workers. J Health Saf Work2022; 12: 54–66.
31.
ArefiMFPouyaABPoursadeqiyanM. Investigating the match between anthropometric measures and the classroom furniture dimensions in Iranian students with health approach: a systematic review. J Educ Health Promot2021; 10: 38–43.
32.
MokaramiHAnsariSCousinsR, et al.Assessing the ergonomic status of commonly used chairs in Iran’s universities based on combinational equations and anthropometric indices. Work2022; 71: 1087–1095.
33.
SahaboMKabaraA. Anthropometrics and ergonomics of secondary school students in four yola metropolis, adamawa state, Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manag2023; 27: 1217–1222.
34.
AduGAduS. Mismatch between office furniture and anthropometric measures in Ghanaian institutions. Ergon2015; 4: 2687–2693.
35.
AdegokeBOJegedeJAOlagbegiOM, et al.Mismatch between workstation and body dimensions among computer users in Ibadan, Nigeria. Indian J Public Health2019; 10: 1895.
36.
OlagbegiOMbadaC. Relationship between quadriceps angle, hip width, and thigh length. J Phys Educ Res2005; 10: 1449–1456.
Karic-SkrijeljMTalicAMasicI, et al.Cervical pain syndrome as consequence of computer use in daily practice. Acta Inf Med2008; 16: 25.
39.
BakerNAMoehlingK. The relationship between musculoskeletal symptoms, postures and the fit between workers’ anthropometrics and their computer workstation configuration. Work2013; 46: 3–10.
40.
Agyapong AfrifahKGlalahM. Ergonomic design of university classroom furniture: evaluation of comfortability and musculoskeletal disorders. Arch Occup Health2021; 5: 1036–1048.
41.
HoqueAParvezMHalderP, et al.Ergonomic design of classroom furniture for university students of Bangladesh. J Ind Prod Eng2014; 31: 239–252.
42.
ParcellsCStommelMHubbardRP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: empirical findings and health implications. J Adolesc Health1999; 24: 265–273.
43.
BelloAISepenuAS. Mismatch in body–chair dimensions and the associated musculoskeletal pain among selected undergraduate students in Ghana. J Musculoskelet Res2013; 16: 1350016.
44.
FeveileHJensenCBurrH. Risk factors for neck-shoulder and wrist-hand symptoms in a 5-year follow-up study of 3,990 employees in Denmark. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2002; 75: 243–251.
45.
MandalA. The seated man (Homo Sedens) the seated work position. Theory and practice. Appl Ergon1981; 12: 19–26.
