Is skin pressure a relevant factor for socket assessment in patients with lower limb amputation?

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Prosthetic rehabilitation improves the overall quality of life of patients, despite discomfort and medical complications. No quantitative assessment of prosthesis-patient interaction is used in routine protocols and prosthesis quality still results from the manufacturer’s know-how.

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective is to investigate whether pressure can be a relevant factor for assessing socket adequacy.

METHODS:

A total of 8 transtibial amputee volunteers took part in this experimental study. The protocol included static standing and 2 minutes walking tests while the stump-to-socket interface pressures were measured. Questionnaires on comfort and pain were also conducted.

RESULTS:

During static standing test, maximum pressures were recorded in the proximal region of the leg, with a peak value reaching 121.1 $\pm$ 31.6 kPa. During dynamic tests, maximum pressures of 254.1 $\pm$ 61.2 kPa were recorded during the loading phase of the step. A significant correlation was found between the pain score and static maximum recorded pressure ( $r=$ 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS:

The protocol proposed and evaluated in this study is a repeatable, easy-to-set quantified analysis of the patient to socket interaction while standing and walking. This approach is likely to improve feedback for prosthesis manufacturers and consequently the overall design of prostheses.

Keywords

Prosthetic socket rehabilitation pain measurement patient satisfaction transtibial amputee gait ability comfort assessment transtibial prosthetic socket

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dillingham

Pezzin

MacKenzie

. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J 2002; 95: 875–83.

Amputee Coalition. Amputee Patient Comfort and Compliance, https://www.amputee-coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/lsp_opedge-survey-article_120115-113042.pdf (2011, accessed 4 September 2018).

Ziegler-Graham

MacKenzie

Ephraim

Travison

Brookmeyer

. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 422–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.

Millstein

Bain

Hunter

. A review of employment patterns of industrial amputees – factors influencing rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1985; 9: 69–78. doi: 10.3109/03093648509164708.

Meulenbelt

HEJ

Geertzen

JHB

Jonkman

Dijkstra

. Skin problems of the stump in lower limb amputees: 1. A clinical study. Acta Derm Venereol 2011; 91: 173–7. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1040.

Bui

Raugi

Nguyen

Reiber

. Skin problems in individuals with lower-limb loss: literature review and proposed classification system. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46: 1085–90.

Laing

Lee

Goh

. Engineering a trans-tibial prosthetic socket for the lower limb amputee. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2011; 40: 252–9.

Jensen

Smith

Ehde

Robinsin

. Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain 2001; 91: 317–22.

Turner

Franklin

Heagerty

Egan

Fulton-Kehoe

, et al. The association between pain and disability. Pain 2004; 112: 307–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010.

10.

Skinner

Effeney

. Gait analysis in amputees. Am J Phys Med 1985; 64: 82–9.

11.

Colombo

Facoetti

Morotti

Rizzi

. Physically based modelling and simulation to innovate socket design. Comput-Aided Des Appl 2011; 8: 617–31. doi: 10.3722/cadaps.2011.617-631.

12.

Goh

JCH

Lee

PVS

Chong

. Stump/socket pressure profiles of the pressure cast prosthetic socket. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 2003; 18: 237–43.

13.

Wong

Whaley

. Clinical handbook of pediatric nursing, ed., 2, p. 373. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company 1986.

14.

Patiño

JFR

Rôa

DFG

Espinal

AAC

. Comfort perception assessment in persons with transfemoral amputation. DYNA 2015; 82: 194–202.

15.

Legro

Reiber

Smith

del Aguila

Larsen

Boone

. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 931–8.

16.

Boone

Coleman

. Use of the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). JPO J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18: P68.

17.

Hollinger

Wanderley

. Evaluation of Commercial Force-Sensing Resistors. In: Proc. Int. Conf. New Interfaces Music. Expr., Paris, France: 2006.

18.

Zhang

Turner-Smith

Tanner

Roberts

. Clinical investigation of the pressure and shear stress on the trans-tibial stump with a prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 188–98. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00013-7.

19.

Dou

Jia

Suo

Wang

Zhang

. Pressure distribution at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees during walking on stairs, slope and non-flat road. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 2006; 21: 1067–73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.06.004.

20.

Ali

Osman

NAA

Mortaza

Eshraghi

Gholizadeh

Wan Abas

WABB

. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction. Clin Biomech 2012; 27: 943–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.004.

21.

Force Sensing Resistor

{}^{\@setsize{\tiny}{7pt}{\vipt}{\@vipt}\textregistered}

(FSR

{}^{\@setsize{\tiny}{7pt}{\vipt}{\@vipt}\textregistered}

) 400 Series Data sheet [Internet]. Interlink Electronics, www.interlinkelectronics.com/ datasheets/Datasheet_FSR.pdf (2018).

22.

Grisé

Gauthier-Gagnon

Martineau

. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 862–70.

23.

Ferriero

Dughi

Orlandini

Moscato

Nicita

Franchignoni

. Measuring long-term outcome in people with lower limb amputation: cross-validation of the Italian versions of the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Eur Medicophysica 2005; 41: 1–6.

24.

Pirouzi

Osman

NAA

Eshraghi

Ali

Gholizadeh

Abas

WABW

. Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis. Sci World J n.d.; 2014: 1–9.

25.

Safari

Tafti

Aminian

. Socket interface pressure and amputee reported outcomes for comfortable and uncomfortable conditions of patellar tendon bearing socket: a pilot study. Assist Technol 2015; 27: 24–31. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.949016.

26.

Butler

Bowen

Hughes

A-M

Torah

Ayala

Tudor

, et al. A systematic review of the key factors affecting tissue viability and rehabilitation outcomes of the residual limb in lower extremity traumatic amputees. J Tissue Viability 2014; 23: 81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2014.08.002.

27.

Sanders

Zachariah

Baker

Greve

Clinton

. Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 2000; 15: 684–94.

28.

Sanders

Daly

. Normal and shear stresses on a residual limb in a prosthetic socket during ambulation: comparison of finite element results with experimental measurements. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993; 30: 191–204.