Implementation and effects of pulse-contour- automated SVV/CI guided goal directed fluid therapy algorithm for the routine management of pancreatic surgery patients
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2016
Implementation and effects of pulse-contour- automated SVV/CI guided goal directed fluid therapy algorithm for the routine management of pancreatic surgery patients
Goal directed fluid management in major abdominal surgery has shown to reduce perioperative complications. The approach aims to optimize the intravascular fluid volume by use of minimally invasive devices which calculate flow-directed variables such as stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume variation (SVV).
OBJECTIVE:
We aimed to show the feasibility of routinely implementing this type of hemodynamic monitoring during pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate its effects in terms of perioperative fluid management and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS:
All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery at a university hospital during two successive 12 months periods were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Twelve months after the implementation of a standard operating procedure for a goal directed therapy (GDT, N = 45) using a pulse contour automated hemodynamic device were compared with a similar period before its use (control, N = 31) regarding mortality, length of hospital and ICU stay, postoperative complications and the use of fluids and vasopressors.
RESULTS:
Overall, 76 patients were analysed. Significantly less crystalloids were used in the GDT group. Patients receiving GDT showed significantly fewer severe complications (insufficiency of intestinal anastomosis: 0 vs. 5 (P = 0.0053) and renal failure: 0 vs. 4 (P = 0.0133). Mortality for pancreatic surgery was 1 vs. 3 patients, (P = 0.142), and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 4.38± 3.63 vs. 6.87 ± 10.02 (P= 0.0964) days. Use of blood products was significantly less within the GDT group.
CONCLUSIONS:
Implementation of a SOP for a GDT in the daily routine using flow-related parameters is feasible and is associated with better outcomes in pancreatic surgery.
StrundenMS, HeckelK, GoetzAE, ReuterDA. Perioperative fluid and volume management: physiological basis, tools and strategies. Ann Intensive Care. 2011; 2: doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-2.
2.
MeregalliA, OliveiraRP, FriedmanG. Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in haemodynamically stable, high-risk, surgical patients. Crit Care. 2004; 8(2): R60.
3.
Bundgaard-NielsenM, HolteK, SecherNH, KehletH. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007; 51(3): 331.
4.
HolteK, SharrockNE, KehletH. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(4): 622.
5.
GiglioMT, MarucciM, TestiniM, BrienzaN. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103(5): 637.
6.
DaviesSJ, WilsonRJ. Preoperative optimization of the high-risk surgical patient. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93(1): 121.
7.
ToteSP, GroundsRM. Performing perioperative optimization of the high-risk surgical patient. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97(1): 4.
8.
ArulkumaranN, CorredorC, HamiltonMA, BallJ, GroundsRM, RhodesA et al. Cardiac complications associated with goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112(4): 648.
9.
ConwayDH, MayallR, Abdul-LatifMS, GilliganS, TackaberryC. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57(9): 845.
10.
WakelingHG, McFallMR, JenkinsCS, WoodsWG, MilesWF, BarclayGR et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(5): 634.
11.
GanTJ, SoppittA, MaroofM, El-MoalemH, RobertsonKM, MorettiE et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97(4): 820.
12.
LopesMR, OliveiraMA, PereiraVO, LemosIP, AulerJO, Jr., MichardF. Goaldirected fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007; 11(5): R100.
13.
NoblettSE, SnowdenCP, ShentonBK, HorganAF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006; 93(9): 1069.
14.
PearseR, DawsonD, FawcettJ, RhodesA, GroundsRM, BennettED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]; Crit Care. 2005; 9(6): R687.
15.
DonatiA, LoggiS, PreiserJC, OrsettiG, MunchC, GabbanelliV. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007; 132(6): 1817.
16.
WilsonJ, WoodsI, FawcettJ, WhallR, DibbW, MorrisC. Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. 1999; 318(7191): 1099.
17.
DerichardA, RobinE, TavernierB, CostecaldeM, FleyfelM, OnimusJ. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103(5): 678.
18.
BenesJ, ChytraI, AltmannA, HluchyM, KasalE, SvitakR. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010; 14(3): R118. doi: 10.1186/cc9070.
19.
MayerJ, BoldtJ, MengistuAM, RöhmKD, SuttnerS. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010; 14(1): R18. doi: 10.1186/cc8875.
20.
RamsinghDS, SanghviC, GamboaJ, CannessonM, Applegate IIRL. Outcome impact of goal directed fluid therapy during high risk abdominal surgery in low to moderate risk patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013; 27(3): 249.
21.
TakalaJ, RuokonenE, TenhunenJJ, ParviainenI, JakobSM. Early non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in hemodynamically unstable care patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2011; 15(3): R148. doi: 10.1186/cc10273.
22.
FeldheiserA, ConroyP, BonomoT, CoxB, RuizGT, SpiesC. Anaesthesia working group of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society. Development and Feasibility Study of Algorithms for Intraoperative Goal-Directed Haemodynamic Management in Noncardiac Surgery. J Int Med Res. 2012; 40(4): 1227.
23.
MowattG, HoustonG, HernándezR, De VerteuilR, FraserC, CuthbertsonB. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2009; 13(7): 1.
24.
BarthaE, DavidsonT, HommelA, ThorngrenKG, CarlssonP, KalmanS. Cost-effectiveness analysis of goal-directed hemodynamic treatment of elderly hip fracture patients: before clinical research starts. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117(3): 519.
25.
BenesJ, ZatloukalJ, SimanovaA, ChytraI, KasalE. Cost analysis of the stroke volume variation guided perioperative hemodynamic optimization - an economic evaluation of the SVVOPT trial results. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014; 14(40): doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-40.
26.
LassenK, CoolsenMM, SlimK, CarliF, de Aguilar-NascimentoJE, SchäferM et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013; 37(2): 240. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1771-1.
27.
HamiltonMA, CecconiM, RhodesA. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011; 112(6): 1392.
28.
PearseRM, HarrisonDA, MacDonaldN, GilliesMA, BluntM, AcklandG et al for the OPITMISE study group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery. A randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014; 311(21): 2181.
29.
CorcoranT, RhodesJE, ClarkeS, MylesPS, KwokMH. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114(3): 640.
30.
ChallandC, StruthersR, SneydJR, ErasmusPD, MellorN, HosieKB et al. Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 10(1): 53.
31.
PestañaD, EspinosaE, EdenA, NájeraD, CollarL, AldecoaC et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, Pragmatic Trial: POEMAS Study (PeriOperative goal-directed thErapy in Major Abdominal Surgery) Anesth Analg. 2014; 119(3): 579.
32.
WangS, WangX, DaiH, HanJ, LiN, LiJ. The effect of intraoperative fluid volume administration on pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Invest Surg. 2014; 27(2): 88.
33.
EngOS, GoswamiJ, MooreD, ChenC, GannonCJ, AugustDA et al. Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108(4): 242.
34.
WrightGP, KoehlerTJ, DavisAT, ChungMH. The drowning whipple: perioperative fluid balance and outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 111(4): 407.
