Literacy is essential for the development and empowerment of students with intellectual disability. However, such students often present limitations that may interfere in their literacy process.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this research was to evaluate the potential of Virtual Reality as an educational tool to support the literacy process of students with intellectual disability.
METHODS:
We have developed a serious game based on Virtual Reality techniques. The game has been validated by special education professionals and used by students and their teachers in two inclusive schools. In order to evaluate the game’s effectiveness, a qualitative methodology has been adopted.
RESULTS:
The study points to a positive evaluation of the game as a tool to aid in the development of literacy skills of students with intellectual disability.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results indicate that Virtual Reality has potential to contribute to the inclusion of students with intellectual disability in the educational context.
PolitisYRobbNYakkundiADillenburgerKHerbertsonNCharlesworthBGoodmanL. People with disabilities leading the design of serious games and virtual worlds. International Journal of Serious Games, 2017; 4(2): 86-97. doi: 10.17083/ijsg.v4i2.160.
2.
BozgeyikliLKatkooriS. A survey on virtual reality for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: design considerations. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies, 2018; 11(2): 133-151.
3.
McMahonDDBarrioBMcMahonAKTuttKFirestoneJ. Virtual Reality Exercise Games for High School Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 2019; 1-10.
4.
McComasJPivikJLaflammeM. Current uses of virtual reality for children with disabilities. Virtual Environments in Clinical Psychology and Neuroscience, 1998; 58: 161-169.
5.
Yalon-ChamovitzSWeissPL. Virtual reality as a leisure activity for young adults with physical and intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2008; 29: 273-287.
6.
VeraLCamposRHerreraG. Computer graphics applications in the education process of people with learning difficulties. Computers & Graphics, 2007; 31: 649-658.
AlfalahSFM. Perceptions toward adopting virtual reality as a teaching aid in information technology. Education and Information Technology, 2018; 23: 2633-2653.
9.
WuangIPChiangCSSuCYWangCC. Effectiveness of virtual reality using wii gaming technology in children with down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2011; 32: 312-321.
10.
Sik LányiCGeisztZKarólyiP, et al. Virtual reality in special needs early education. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 2006; 5(4): 55-68.
11.
JeffsT. Virtual reality and special needs. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2009; 2(1): 253-268.
12.
LopesJBPCarvalho DuarteNACLazzariRDOliveiraCS. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation process for individuals with cerebral palsy and Down syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.006.
13.
Morash-MacneilVJohnsonFRyanJB. A systematic review of assistive technology for individuals with intellectual disability in the workplace. Journal of Special Education Technology, 2018; 33(1): 15-26.
14.
MalaquiasFFOMalaquiasRFLamounierEA JrCardosoA. VirtualMat: a serious game to teach logical-mathematical concepts for students with intellectual disability. Technology and Disability, 2013; 25: 107-116.
15.
MalaquiasFFOMalaquiasRF. The role of virtual reality in the learning process of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Technology and Disability, 2016; 28: 133-138.
16.
SchalockRLBorthwick-DuffySABradleyVJ. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. AAIDD, 11 ed. 2010.
17.
WestwoodP. What teachers need to know about students with disabilities. ACER Press, 2009.
18.
LittleME. Teaching mathematics: issues and solutions teaching exceptional children plus. 2009; 6(1): 1-15.
19.
NycykM. Education support for adults with an intellectual disability: a tutor’s reflection. Adult Learning, 2018; 29(4): 176-178.
20.
Van TilborgASegersEVan BalkomHVerhoevenL. Predictors of early literacy skills in children with intellectual disabilities: a clinical perspective. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2014; 35: 1674-1685.
21.
Van TilborgASegersEVan BalkomHVerhoevenL. Modeling individual variation in early literacy skills in kindergarten children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2018; 72: 1-12.
22.
Van WingerdenESegersEvan BalkomHVerhoevenL. Foundations of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2017; 60: 211-222.
23.
VygotskyLS. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 2: The Fundamentals of Defectology (Abnormal Psychology and Learning Disabilities). Rieber RW and Carton AS editors. New York: Plenum Press, 1993.
24.
VygotskyLS. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
25.
BurackJAHodappRMZiglerE. Handbook of mental retardation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
26.
LemonsCJKingSADavidsonKAPuranikCSAl OtaibaSFidlerDJ. Personalized reading intervention for children with down syndrome. Journal of School Psychology, 2018; 66: 67-84.
27.
OliveiraMK. Vygotsky – Aprendizado e desenvolvimento: um processo sócio-histórico. 4 ed. São Paulo: Scipione, 1997.
28.
HamadaouiNMohammedKIBennani,S. Serious Games in Education: Towards the standardization of the teaching-learning process. Journées Doctorales en Technologies de l’ Information et de la Communication, 2014. Available at: http://www.europment.org/library/2014/santorini/bypaper/EDU/EDU-31.pdf.
29.
TerrasMMBoyleEARamsayJJarrettD. The opportunities and challenges of serious games for people with an intellectual disability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2018; 49(4): 690-700.
30.
LanyiCSBrownDJ. Design of Serious Games for Students with Intellectual Disability. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Interaction Design International Development, 2010, pp. 44-54.
