To evaluate the efficacy of an expanded form of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (eCIMT) that renders CIMT, originally designed for treating mild-to-moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis, suitable for treating severe hemiparesis.
Methods:
Twenty-one adults ≥1 year after stroke with severe upper-extremity hemiparesis (with little or no capacity to make movements with the more-affected hand) were randomly assigned to eCIMT (n = 10), a placebo-control procedure (n = 4), or usual care (n = 7). The participants who received usual care were crossed over to eCIMT four months after enrollment. The CIMT protocol was altered to include fitting of orthotics and adaptive equipment, selected neurodevelopmental techniques, and electromyography-triggered functional electrical stimulation. Treatment was given for 15 consecutive weekdays with 6 hours of therapy scheduled daily for the immediate eCIMT group and 3.5 hours daily for the cross-over eCIMT group.
Results:
At post-treatment, the immediate eCIMT group showed significant gains relative to the combination of the control groups on the Grade-4/5 Motor Activity Log (MAL; mean = 1.5 points, P < 0.001, f = 4.2) and a convergent measure, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM; mean = 2.3, P = 0.014, f = 1.1; f values ≥0.4 are considered large, on the COPM changes ≥2 are considered clinically meaningful). At 1-year follow-up, the MAL gains in the immediate eCIMT group were only 13% less than at post-treatment. The short and long-term outcomes of the crossover eCIMT group were similar to those of the immediate eCIMT group.
Conclusions:
This small, randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggests that eCIMT produces a large, meaningful, and persistent improvement in everyday use of the more-affected arm in adults with severe upper-extremity hemiparesis long after stroke. These promising findings warrant confirmation by a large RCT.
BohannonR.W., & SmithM.B. (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67, 206–207.
3.
BowmanM.H., TaubE., UswatteG., DelgadoA., BrysonC., MorrisD.M., & … MarkV.W. (2006) A treatment for a chronic stroke patient with a plegic hand combining CI therapy with conventional rehabilitation procedures: Case report. NeuroRehabilitation, 21, 167–176.
4.
CauraughJ.H., & KimS.B. (2003) Stroke motor recovery: Active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practive schedules. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 74, 1562–1566.
5.
ChaeJ., BethouxF., BohineT., DobosL., DavisT., & FriedlA. (1998) Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke, 29, 975–979.
6.
CohenJ. (1988), Statistical power analysis for the behoral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
DromerickA.W., LangC.E., BirkenmeierR., HahnM.G., SahrmannS.A., & EdwardsD.F. (2006) Relationship between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 43, 401–408.
8.
DuncanP.W., WallaceD., LaiS.M., JohnsonD., EmbretsonS., & LasterL.J. (1999) The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.
9.
Fugl-MeyerA.R., JaaskoL., LeymanI., OlsonS., & SteglindS. (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13–31.
10.
GauthierL.V., TaubE., MarkV.W., BarghiA., & UswatteG. (2012) Atrophy of spared grey matter tissue predicts poorer motor recovery and rehabilitation response in chronic stroke. Stroke, 43, 453–457.
11.
GauthierL.V., TaubE., PerkinsC., OrtmannM., MarkV.W., & UswatteG. (2008) Remodeling the brain: Plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke, 39, 1520–1525.
12.
HatemS.M., SaussezG., Della FailleM., PristV., ZhangX., DispaD., & BleyenheuftY. (2016) Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442
13.
HodicsT.M., NakatsukaK., UpretiB., AlexA., SmithP.S., & PezzulloJ.C. (2012) Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, 1963–1967.
14.
HowleJ.M. (2004), Neuro-developmental treatment approaches: Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical care. Laguna Beach, CA: NDTA.
15.
LaiS.M., StudenskiS., DuncanP.W., & PereraS. (2002) Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke, 33, 1840–1844.
LiepertJ., BauderH., WolfgangH.R., MiltnerW.H., TaubE., & WeillerC. (2000) Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke, 31, 1210–1216.
18.
LinK.C., HuangP.C., ChenY.T., WuC.Y., & HuangW.L. (2014) Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 153–162.
19.
LinK.C., WuC.Y., WeiT.H., LeeC.Y., & LiuJ.S. (2007) Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach to grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 1075–1086.
20.
LuftA.R., & HanleyD.F. (2006) Stroke recovery- moving in an EXCITE-ing direction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 2141–2143.
21.
Massimo PentaI., TesioL., ArnouldC., ZancanA., & ThonnardJ. (2001) The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients. Stroke, 32, 1627–1634.
22.
McCollM.A., PatersonM., DaviesD., DoubtL., & LawM. (2000) Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 23–30.
23.
MichielsenM.E., SellesR.W., van der GeestJ.N., EckhardtM., YavuzerG., StamH.J., & … BussmannJ.B. (2011) Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: A phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 223–233.
24.
MorrisD.M., UswatteG., CragoJ., CookE.W., & III TaubE. (2001) The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity motor function following stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 750–755.
25.
NelsonA., FogelB.S., & FaustD. (1986) Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 73–83.
26.
Nichols-LarsenD., ClarkP.C., ZeringueA., GreenspanA., & BlantonS. (2005) Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke, 36, 1480–1484.
27.
ParkerV.M., WadeD.T., & Langton-HewerR. (1986) Loss of arm function after stroke: Measurement, frequency, and recovery. International Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 8, 69–73.
28.
PetersonD.B. (2005) International classification of functioning, disability and health: An introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 105–112.
29.
PhippsS., & RichardsonP. (2007) Occupational therapy outcomes for clients with traumatic brain injury and stroke using the Canadian Occupational Perfomance Measure. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 328–334.
30.
PollockA., FarmerS.E., BradyM.C., LanghorneP., MeadG. E., MehrholzJ., & van WijckF. (2014) Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) (11), CD010820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2
31.
RubinD.B., & SheinerL.B. (1995) Intention-to-treat analysis and the goals of clinical trials. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 57, 6–15.
32.
SkinnerB.F. (1938), The behor of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33.
SterrA., O’NeillD., DeanP.J., & HerronK.A. (2014) CI therapy is beneficial to patients with chronic low-functioning hemiparesis after stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 5, 204. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00204
34.
TaubE. (1980) Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: Implications for rehabilitation medicine. In InceL.P. (Ed.), Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: Clinical applications, New York: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 371–401.
35.
TaubE., MillerN.E., NovackT.A., CookE.W., III FlemingW.C., NepomucenoC.S., & … CragoJ. (1993) Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347–354.
36.
TaubE., UswatteG., BowmanM.H., MarkV.W., DelgadoA., BrysonC., … & McKayS. (2013) Constraint-Induced Movement therapy combined with conventional neurorehabilitation techniques in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands: A case series. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 86–94.
37.
TaubE., UswatteG., KingD.K., MorrisD., CragoJ., & ChatterjeeA. (2006) A placebo controlled trial of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke, 37, 1045–1049.
38.
TaubE., UswatteG., MarkV.W., & MorrisD.M. (2006) The learned nonuse phenomenon: Implications for rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica, 42, 241–255.
39.
TaubE., UswatteG., MarkV.W., MorrisD.M., BarmanJ., BowmanM.H., … & Bishop-McKayS. (2013) Method for enhancing real-world use of a more-affected arm in chronic stroke: Transfer package of CI therapy. Stroke, 44, 1383–1388.
40.
ThiemeH., BaynM., WurgM., ZangeC., PohlM., & BehrensJ. (2013) Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke–a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 314–324.
41.
UswatteG., GiulianiC., WinsteinC., ZeringueA., HobbsL., & WolfS.L. (2006) Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: Evidence from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1340–1345.
42.
UswatteG., & TaubE. (2005) Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: Lessons from Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 34–42.
43.
UswatteG., TaubE., MorrisD., LightK., & ThompsonP.A. (2006) The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, 67, 1189–1194.
44.
UswatteG., TaubE., MorrisD., VignoloM., & McCullochK. (2005) Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke, 36, 2493–2496.
45.
WolfS.L., CatlinP., EllisM., Link ArcherA., MorganB., & PiacentinoA. (2001) Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32, 1635–1639.
46.
WuC.Y., HuangP.C., ChenY.T., LinK.C., & YangH.W. (2013) Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1023–1030.
