Background: Motor imagery is used for treatment of motor deficits after stroke. Clinical observations suggested that motor imagery abilities might be reduced in patients with severe sensory deficits. This study investigated the influence of somatosensory deficits on temporal (mental chronometry, MC) and spatial aspects of motor imagery abilities.
Methods: Stroke patients (n = 70; <6 months after stroke) were subdivided into 3 groups according to their somatosensory functions. Group 1 (n = 31) had no sensory deficits, group 2 (n = 27) had a mild to moderate sensory impairment and group 3 (n = 12) had severe sensory deficits. Patients and a healthy age-matched control group (n = 23) participated in a mental chronometry task (Box and Block Test, BBT) and a mental rotation task (Hand Identification Test, HIT). MC abilities were expressed as a ratio (motor execution time–motor imagery time/motor execution time).
Results: MC for the affected hand was significantly impaired in group 3 in comparison to stroke patients of group 1 (p = 0.006), group 2 (p = 0.005) and healthy controls (p < 0.001). For the non-affected hand MC was similar across all groups. Stroke patients had a slower BBT motor execution than healthy controls (p < 0.001), and group 1 executed the task faster than group 3 (p = 0.002). The percentage of correct responses in the HIT was similar for all groups.
Conclusion: Severe sensory deficits impair mental chronometry abilities but have no impact on mental rotation abilities. Future studies should explore whether the presence of severe sensory deficits in stroke patients reduces the benefit from motor imagery therapy.
AbelaE., MissimerJ., WiestR., FederspielA., HessC., SturzeneggerM., & WederB. (2012). Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke. PLoS One, 7(2), e31275.
2.
BaskettJ.J., MarshallH.J., BroadJ.B., OwenP.H., & GreenG. (1996). The good side after stroke: Ipsilateral sensory-motor function needs careful assessment. Age Ageing, 25(3), 239–244.
3.
BraunS.M., BeurskensA.J., KleynenM., OudelaarB., ScholsJ.M., & WadeD.T. (2012). A multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare subacute ‘treatment as usual’ with and without mental practice among persons with stroke in Dutch nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(1), 85, e1–e7.
4.
ChenH.M., ChenC.C., HsuehI.P., HuangS.L., & HsiehC.L. (2009). Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 435–440.
5.
DesrosiersJ., BravoG., HébertR., DutilE., & MercierL. (1994). Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 751–755.
6.
DettmersC., BenzM., LiepertJ., & RockstrohB. (2012). Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 126(4), 238–247.
7.
DijkermanH.C., LetswaartM., JohnstonM., & MacWalterR.S. (2004). Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 538–549.
8.
GreinerJ., SchoenfeldM.A., & LiepertJ. (2014). Assessment of mental chronometry (MC) in healthy subjects. Archives of Gerontolology and Geriatrics, 58(2), 226–230.
9.
GuillotA., & ColletC. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: A review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(1), 10–20.
10.
HemmenB., & SeelenH.A. (2007). Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(7), 587–594.
11.
HermsdörferJ., & GoldenbergG. (2002). Ipsilesional deficits during fast diadochokinetic hand movements following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 2100–2115.
12.
IetswaartM., JohnstonM., DijkermanH.C., JoiceS., ScottC.L., MacWalterR.S., & HamiltonS.J. (2011). Mental practice with motor imagery in stroke recovery: Randomized controlled trial of efficacy. Brain, 134(Pt 5), 1373–1386.
13.
JohnsonS.H. (2000). Imagining the impossible: Intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport, 11(4), 729–732.
14.
JohnsonS.H., SprehnG., & SaykinA.J. (2002). Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: Evidence for activity-independent action representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 841–852.
15.
KalicinskiM., KempeM., & BockO. (2015). Motor imagery: Effects of age, task complexity, and task setting. Experimental Aging Research, 41(1), 25–38.
16.
LadurnerG., TschinkelM., KleblH., & LytwinH. (1985). Reaction time in cerebrovascular disease. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 4(4), 373–379.
17.
LiepertJ., GreinerJ., NedelkoV., & DettmersC. (2012). Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: Clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(5), 470–478.
18.
LiuK.P., ChanC.C., LeeT.M., & Hui-ChanC.W. (2004). Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(9), 1403–1408.
19.
LiuK.P., ChanC.C., WongR.S., KwanI.W., YauC.S., LiL.S., & LeeT.M. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of mental imagery augment generalization of learning in acute poststroke patients. Stroke, 40(6), 2222–2225.
20.
MalouinF., & RichardsC.L. (2010). Mental practice for relearning locomotor skills. Physical Therapy, 90, 240–251.
21.
MalouinF., RichardsC.L., & DurandA. (2010). Normal aging and motor imagery vividness: Implications for mental practice training in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(7), 1122–1127.
22.
MalouinF., BellevilleS., RichardsC.L., DesrosiersJ., & DoyonJ. (2004). Working memory and mental practice outcomes after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(2), 177–183.
23.
MalouinF., RichardsC.L., DurandA., & DoyonJ. (2008). Reliability of mental chronometry for assessing motor imagery ability after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(2), 311–319.
24.
MathiowetzV., VollandG., KashmanN., & WeberK. (1985). Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(6), 386–391.
25.
McInnesK., FriesenC., & BoeS. (2015). Specific brain lesions impair explicit motor imagery ability: A systematic review of the evidence. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, pii: S0003-9993(15)00620-6.
26.
MeyerS., KarttunenA.H., ThijsV., FeysH., & VerheydenG. (2014). How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 94(9), 1220–1231.
27.
MüllerK., BütefischC.M., SeitzR.J., & HömbergV. (2007). Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 501–511.
28.
MulderT., HochstenbachJ.B., van HeuvelenM.J., & den OtterA.R. (2007). Motor imagery: The relation between age and imagery capacity. Human Movement Science, 26(2), 203–211.
29.
NowakD.A., GrefkesC., DafotakisM., KüstJ., KarbeH., & FinkG.R. (2007). Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. European Journal of Neuroscience, 25(10), 3173–3184.
30.
NudoR.J., FrielK.M., & DeliaS.W. (2000). Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex. Neuropharmacology, 39(5), 733–742.
31.
PageS.J., LevineP., & LeonardA. (2007). Mental practice in chronic stroke: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke, 38(4), 1293–1297.
32.
PageS.J., LevineP., & KhouryJ.C. (2009). Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: Thinking through better motor outcomes. Stroke, 40(2), 551–554.
33.
PageS.J., DunningK., HermannV., LeonardA., & LevineP. (2011). Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 25(7), 627–637.
34.
Paternostro-SlugaT., Grim-StiegerM., PoschM., SchuhfriedO., VacariuG., MittermaierC., et al. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 665–671.
PlatzT., PinkowskiC., van WijckF., KimI.C.H., di BellaP., & JohnsonG. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 404–411.
37.
RiccioI., IolasconG., BarillariM.R., GimiglianoR., & GimiglianoF. (2010). Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: A randomized single-blind cross-over study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(1), 19–25.
38.
SaimpontA., MalouinF., TousignantB., & JacksonP.L. (2013). Motor imagery and aging. Journal of Motor Behavior, 45(1), 21–28.
39.
SaimpontA., MalouinF., TousignantB., & JacksonP.L. (2015). Assessing motor imagery ability in younger and older adults by combining measures of vividness, controllability and timing of motor imagery. Brain Research, 1597, 196–209.
40.
SchottN. (2012). Age-related differences in motor imagery: Working memory as a mediator. Experimental Aging Research, 38(5), 559–583.
41.
SheikhK., BrennanP.J., MeadeT.W., SmithD.S., & GoldenbergE. (1983). Predictors of mortality and disability in stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health, 37, 70–74.
42.
SiriguA., DuhamelJ.R., CohenL., PillonB., DuboisB., & AgidY. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science, 273, 1564–1568.
43.
TimmermansA.A., VerbuntJ.A., van WoerdenR., MoennekensM., PernotD.H., & SeelenH.A. (2013). Effect of mental practice on the improvement of function and daily activity performance of the upper extremity in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(3), 204–212.
44.
VromenA., VerbuntJ.A., RasquinS., & WadeD.T. (2011). Motor imagery in patients with a right hemisphere stroke and unilateral neglect. Brain Injury, 25(4), 387–393.
45.
WuA.J., HermannV., YingJ., & PageS.J. (2010). Chronometry of mentally versus physically practiced tasks in people with stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 929–934.
46.
ZapparoliL., InvernizziP., GandolaM., VerardiM., BerlingeriM., SbernaM., De SantisA., ZerbiA., BanfiG., BottiniG., & PaulesuE. (2013). Mental images across the adult lifespan: A behavioural and fMRI investigation of motor execution and motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research, 224(4), 519–540.
