Background. The ability to generate vivid images of movements is variable across individuals and likely influenced by sensorimotor inputs. Objectives. The authors examined (1) the vividness of motor imagery in dancers and in persons with late blindness, with amputation or an immobilization of one lower limb; (2) the effects of prosthesis use on motor imagery; and (3) the temporal characteristics of motor imagery. Methods. Eleven dancers, 10 persons with late blindness, 14 with amputation, 6 with immobilization, and 2 groups of age-matched healthy individuals (27 in control group A; 35 in control group B) participated. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire served to assess motor imagery vividness. Temporal characteristics were assessed with mental chronometry. Results. The late blindness group and dance group displayed higher imagery scores than respective control groups. In the amputation and immobilization groups, imagery scores were lower on the affected side than the intact side and specifically for imagined foot movements. Imagery scores of the affected limb positively correlated with the time since walking with prosthesis. Movement times during imagination and execution (amputation and immobilization) were longer on the affected side than the intact side, but the temporal congruence between real and imagined movement times was similar to that in the control group. Conclusions. The mental representation of actions is highly modulated by imagery practice and motor activities. The ability to generate vivid images of movements can be specifically weakened by limb loss or disuse, but lack of movement does not affect the temporal characteristics of motor imagery.
Decety J., Grèzes J.Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:172-178.
2.
Jeannerod M.Mental imagery in the motor context. Neurophysiologica. 1995;33:1419-1432.
3.
Decety J., Boisson D.Effect of brain and spinal cord injuries on motor imagery. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 1990;240:39-43.
4.
Decety J., Michel F.Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks . Brain Cogn.1989;11:87-97.
5.
Decety J., Jeannerod M.Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res. 1995 ;72:127-134.
6.
Wuyam B., Moosavi SH, Decety J., Adams L., Lansing RW, Guz A.Imagination of dynamic exercise produced ventilatory responses which were more apparent in competitive sportsmen. J Physiol. 1995;482: 713-724.
7.
Fusi S., Cutuli D., Valente MR, Bergonzi P., Porro CA, Di Prampero PECardioventilatory responses during real or imagined walking at low speed. Arch Ital Biol. 2005;143:223-228.
8.
Decety J.Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3:87-93.
9.
Gerardin E., Sirigu A., Lehericy S., et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10: 1093-1104.
10.
Lafleur MF, Jackson PL, Richards CL, Malouin F., Evans A., Doyon J.Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements. Neuroimage. 2002;16:142-157.
11.
Ehrsson HH, Geyer S., Naito E.Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:3304-3316.
12.
Hall CR, Pongrac J., Buckolz E.The measurement of imagery ability. Human Mov Sci . 1985;4:107-118.
13.
Isaac AR, Marks DFIndividual differences in mental imagery experience: development changes and specialization. Br J Pshychol. 1994;85:479-500.
14.
Hall CR, Martin KAMeasuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire . J Mental Imagery. 1997;21: 143-154.
15.
Lorant J., Gaillot L.Validation de la version française du movement imagery questionnaire (MIQ) . Revue Canadienne Sci Comport. 2004 ;36: 30-35.
16.
Lorant J., Nicolas A.Validation de la traduction française du movement imagery questionnaire-revised (MIQ-R). Sci Motricité. 2004;53:57-68.
17.
Malouin F., Richards C., Durand A., Doyon J.Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:330-340.
18.
Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F., Richards CL, Doyon J.Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1171-1180.
19.
Lotze M., Scheler G., Tan H.-RM, Braun C., Birbaumer N.The musician's brain: functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1817-1829.
20.
Johnson SHImagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics . Neuroreport. 2000;11:729-732.
21.
Johnson SH, Sprehn G., Saykin AJIntact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. J Cogn Neurosci . 2002 ;14:841-852.
22.
Alkadhi H., Brugger P., Boendermaker SH, et al. What disconnection tells about motor imagery: evidence from paraplegic patients. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:131-140.
23.
Cramer SC, Orr ELR, Cohen MJ, Lacourse MGEffects of motor imagery training after chronic, complete spinal cord injury . Exp Brain Res. 2007;177:233-242.
24.
Hotz-Boendermaker S., Funk M., Summers P., et al. Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. Neuroimage. 2008;39:383-394.
25.
Nico D., Daprati E., Rigal F., Parsons L., Sirigu A.Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain . 2003;27:120-132.
26.
Imbiriba LA, Rodrigues EC, Magalhães J., Vargas CDMotor imagery in blind subjects: the influence of the previous visual experience Neurosci Lett. 2006;400:181-185.
27.
Oakley DA, Halligan PWHypnotic imagery as a treatment for phantom limb pain: two case reports and a review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:368-377.
28.
Hugdahl K., Rosén G., Ersland L., et al. Common pathways in mental imagery and pain perception: an fMRI study of a subject with an amputated arm. Scand J Psychol . 2001;42:269-275.
29.
Christakou A., Zervas Y., Lavallee D.The adjunctive role of imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a grade II ankle sprain. Human Movement Science. 2007;26:141-154.
30.
Malouin F., Richards C., Jackson P., Lafleur M., Durand A., Doyon J.The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.
31.
Malouin F., Richards CL, Durand A., Doyon J.Reliability of mental chronometry for assessing motor imagery ability after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:311-319.
32.
Hanrahan C. , Vergeer I.Multiple uses of mental imagery by professional modern dancers. Imagination, Cognit Personality . 2002;20;231-255.
33.
Nordin SM, Cummings J.Where, when and how: a quantitative account of dance imagery. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2007;78:390-395.
34.
Blasch BB, Wiener WR, Welsh RL, eds. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility. 2nd ed. New York, NY: AFB Press; 1997:775.
35.
Chapman JP, Chapman LJ, Allen JJThe measurement of foot preference. Neuropsychologia . 1987;25:579-584.
36.
Fourkas AD, Bonavolontà V., Avenanti A., Aglioti SMKinesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. Cereb Cortex. 2008 . [Epub ahead of print: PMID: 18296436.]
37.
Thinus-Blanc C., Gaunet F.Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? Psychological Bulletin . 1997;121:20-42.
38.
Voss P., Lassonde M., Gougoux F., Guillemot JP, Lepore F.Early- and late-onset blind individuals show supra-normal auditory abilities in far space. Current Biology. 2004 ;14:1734-1738.
39.
Heller MA, Brackett DDSuperior haptic perceptual selectivity in late-blind and very low vision subjects . Perception. 2003;32:499-511.
40.
Grant AC, Thiagarajah MC, Sathian K.Tactile perception in blind Braille readers: a psychophysiological study of acuity and hyperacuity using gratings and dot patterns. Percept Psychophys. 2000;62:301-312.
41.
Heller MAPicture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: the advantage of the late blind. Perception. 1989;18:379-389.
42.
Vanlierde A. , Wanet-Defalque MCAbilities and strategies of blind and sighted subjects in visuo-spatial imagery. Acta Psychologica . 2004;116: 205-222.
43.
Mercier C., Reilly KT, Vargas CD, Aballea A., Sirigu A.Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees . Brain. 2006,129:2202-2210.
44.
Koojiman CM , Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Elzinga A., van der Schan CPPhantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study . Pain. 2000;87:33-41.
45.
Reilly KT, Mercier C., Schieber MH, Sirigu A.Persistent hand motor command in the amputees' brain. Brain . 2006;129:221-223.
Price EHA critical review of congenital phantom limb cases and a developmental theory for the basis of body image. Conscious Cogn. 2006;15:310-322.
48.
Funk M., Brugger PJMental rotation of congenitally absent hands. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14:81-89.
49.
Berlucchi G. , Aglioti S.The body in the brain: neural bases of corporal awareness. Trends Neurosci. 1997,20:560-564.
50.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MMUse-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996 ;16:785-807.
51.
Liepert J., Tegenthoff M., Malin JPChanges of cortical motor area size during immobilization. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:382-386.
52.
Zanette G., Tinazzi M., Bonato C., et al. Reversible changes of motor cortical outputs following immobilization of the upper limb. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:269-279.
53.
Kaneko F., Murakami T., Onari K., Kurumadani H., Kawaguchi K.Decreased cortical excitability during motor imagery after disuse of an upper limb in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:2397-2403.
54.
Zanette G., Manganotti P., Fiaschi A., Tamburin S.Modulation of motor cortex excitability after upper limb immobilization . Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1264-1275.
55.
Crews RT, Kamen G.Motor-evoked potentials following imagery and limb disuse. Intern J Neurosci. 2006;116:639-651.
56.
Sharma N., Pomeroy VM, Baron JCMotor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006;37:1941-1952.
57.
Lotze M., Halsband U.Motor imagery. J Physiol. 2006;99:386-395.
58.
Lotze M., Flor H., Grodd W., Larbig W., Birbaumer N.Phantom movements and pain. A fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001;124: 2268-2277.
59.
Guillot A., Collet C., Vo An N., Malouin F., Richards CL, Doyon J.Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery ability. Neuroimage. 2008;41:1471-1483.
60.
Guillot A., Collet C.Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res Rev. 2005;50:387-397.
61.
Roure R., Collet C., Deschaumes-Molinaro C., Delhomme G., Dittmar A., Vernet-Maury E.Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiol Behav. 1999 ;66: 63-72.
62.
De Lange FP , Roelofs K., Toni I.Motor imagery: a window into the mechanisms and alterations of the motor system. Cortex. 2008;44:494-506.
