Abstract
PURPOSE:
Sexuality has received little attention in spina bifida (SB) care. The aim of this study was to assess sexual identity and orientation in adults with SB.
METHODS:
An international online survey to adults with SB was administered over 10-months (recruitment: SB clinics, SB organizations via social media). Collected data included demographics, sexual identity and orientation. Non-parametric tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS:
Median age of 77 men and 119 women was 35 years old (52.0% shunted, 48.5% community ambulators, 42.3% outside United States). Most commonly, men identified as male (96.1%), while 1.3% each described themselves as female, transgender and other. All women reporting sexual identity identified as female (99.2%), 0.8% not providing an answer. Most men reported heterosexual orientation (89.6%), followed by gay (7.8%) and bisexual (2.6%). Most women reported heterosexual orientation (84.9%), followed by bisexual (10.4%), gay/lesbian (2.5%), asexual (0.8%) and other (1.7%).
CONCLUSION:
As in the general population, sexual identity typically coincides with biological gender. Sexual orientation of adults with SB mirrors the general population. Due to self-selection, these findings likely do not reflect exact prevalence in the SB population.
Introduction
As children born with spina bifida (SB) are increasingly more likely to become adults with SB [1, 2], adult concerns regarding sexual health have become more commonplace [3, 4, 5]. SB affects multiple organ systems, including mobility and the lumbosacral innervation of sexual organs. Unfortunately, sexuality and reproduction are often poorly managed areas in the lives of adults with SB. A tendency to ignore issues of sexuality by healthcare professionals may exist, leading to an adoption of an asexual stance that infantilizes this population [6]. Dependence on caregivers and lack of data to guide counseling and clinical decision-making likely play a role. In fact, basic sexual characteristics of adults with SB have not been explored beyond a single center series [7]. We aimed to determine sexual identity and orientation in adults with SB. We hypothesized that sexual characteristics of adults with SB mirror the general population and few identify themselves as asexual.
Population characteristics
Population characteristics
We administered an anonymous, international online survey to men and women
Participants were grouped as men and women based on their answer to the question: “I was born: male, female.” Sexual identity, or gender, was assessed with 4 options: female, male, transgender and other, as recommended by Reisner et al. [9]. Sexual orientation was assessed with 5 options: straight/heterosexual (not gay); gay, lesbian, or homosexual; bisexual (I am attracted to both men and women); asexual (I am not sexually attracted to others), other (with free text for a description). A similar classification was used in the 2009 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior of the United States population [10].
The authors, including an adult and adolescent sexuality expert (DJH), prepared a pilot questionnaire. It was reviewed by 3 additional pediatric urologists and 2 nurse practitioners regularly treating adults with SB (Acknowledgements). Items were reworded for comprehension and clarity after feedback from 2 men and 5 women with SB (median age 30 years old) and a Health Literacy Educator (Acknowledgments). Readability was grade 7 on the Flesch Kincaid Grade Level test [11].
Analysis involved Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous data and Fisher’s exact
tests for categorical data (
Results
Participant characteristics
Median age of 77 men and 119 women was 35 years old (IQR: 29–43, range
19–73). Half of the participants had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (52.0%) and 48.5% were
community ambulators. Of the 44.4% of adults managing their bladders with clean
intermittent catheterizations, all did so independently. Overall, 41.5% of those
Adults from the United States (57.7%) lived in 36 states. Others lived in the United Kingdom (13.8%), Canada (7.1%), New Zealand (4.1%), Australia (3.1%), Turkey (2.0%), Belgium (1.5%), Ireland (1.0%), Pakistan (1.0%), Algeria, El Salvador, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Maldives, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Sweden and Tanzania (0.5% each).
Sexual identity
Most men identified themselves as male (96.1%), 1.3% described themselves
as female, 1.3% as transgender and 1.3% as other (Table 2). All reporting women indicated their sexual identity as being female (99.2%),
with 0.8% not providing an answer. Differences in reported sexual identity other than
biological gender between men and women did not reach statistical significance
(
Sexual identity reported by adults with spina bifida
Sexual identity reported by adults with spina bifida
Most men reported a heterosexual orientation (89.6%), followed by gay
(7.8%) and bisexual (2.6%) (Table 3). Most women
reported a heterosexual orientation (84.9%), followed by bisexual (10.1%), gay/ lesbian
(2.5%), asexual (0.8%) and other (demisexual, person who does not experience sexual
attraction without a strong emotional connection first, and not sure, 0.8% each). Men were
more likely to report gay orientation while women more likely to report bisexual
orientation (
Sexual orientation reported by adults with spina bifida
Sexual orientation reported by adults with spina bifida
*Other: demisexual (1), not sure (1).
In the first large, international study of sexual characteristics of adults with SB, we report that the vast majority of adults with SB identify their gender consistent with their biological gender. Their sexual orientation appears to mirror the general population based on national statistics. Only 0.5% of adults with SB identify as asexual, underlining that asexuality occurs rarely both in adults with and without SB. Since participation was voluntary, and not probability-based, our findings do not represent true prevalence in the SB population. Statistical comparisons with national references would not be reliable. Rather, our results characterize general patterns.
While several studies of adults in the United States describe sexual identity and sexual orientation in the general population [12, 13], no similar work has been published in SB. Two large studies in the United States estimated prevalence of sexual identity other than biological gender at up to 0.3–0.5% [12, 13]. Similarly, nearly all adults with SB in this study reported sexual identity consistent with biological gender.
Heterosexual sexual orientation has been reported by 93–97% of the general population, with 2–3% identifying as gay/lesbian, 0.2–3% bisexual and 0.2–2% other [10, 14]. Similarly, in our study, adults with SB typically identified as heterosexual, with a significant minority reporting different sexual orientations. This is consistent with findings of the only study of adults with SB reporting sexual orientation: 95% of 22 men with SB and 83% of 24 women followed at one Japanese center reported sexual attraction to the opposite sex [7].
Men with SB in our study were more likely to report gay rather than bisexual sexual orientation, similar to the general population [10, 14]. On the other hand, women with SB reported bisexual rather than lesbian sexual orientation more often. This pattern was observed in some population studies [10], but not others [14].
Comprehensive care to adults with SB involves the challenging management of acute and chronic issues of urinary and fecal incontinence, kidney and bladder stones, urinary tract infections, worsening renal function, pain, skin breakdown, mobility, and complications related to previous surgeries, against an ever changing landscape of personal, social and financial resources. It is becoming clear that sexuality is an important part of life of many adults with SB. Currently, attention to sexuality plays a minor, if any, role in their care [3]. Our data highlight that adults with SB identify themselves as sexual beings, with sexual characteristics mirroring the general population. Therefore, we strongly believe that the sensitivity and attention given to matters of sexuality among patients without SB should also be applied to those with SB.
The current study has several strengths. Voluntary, anonymous, online participation was used to maximize the reliability of provided answers. Study questions were developed by an interdisciplinary panel of experts and adults with SB. We surveyed a heterogeneous, international population. Similar to other large SB studies, most study participants were female, half were shunted and half were community ambulators [15, 16, 17]. Two thirds of participants of the United States National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) are shunted and half are community ambulators [18]. This suggests our findings may be generalizable to the larger SB population.
The wording of questions and answer options can potentially introduce bias, making comparisons between studies using different methodology challenging, if not impossible. In an effort to minimize this risk, we adopted definitions previously used in multiple sexuality studies [9, 10].
The largest limitation of this study is potential self-selection bias. Due to
voluntary online participation, those with internet access who were most motivated, most
interested in sexuality and had fewest functional limitations were most likely to
participate. The degree of bladder dysfunction was presumably lower in our study population
compared to the NSBPR, with 44% versus 76% performing clean intermittent
catheterizations [19]. Our participants were
also independent. Every person performing clear intermittent catheterizations did so
independently. In addition, 41% of participants aged
Conclusions
Adults with SB consider themselves sexual beings. As in the general population, sexual identity of adults with SB typically coincides with biological gender. Sexual orientation of adults with SB appears to mirror the general population based on national statistics. Asexuality is very rare. This novel data underline the importance of integrating sexuality and sexual health into comprehensive SB care.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the adults with spina bifida who participated and the following organizations for their support of this project: Spina Bifida Association (United States), the International Federation of Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida (International), Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus Association of Canada (Canada), Spina Bifida Association of New Zealand (New Zealand) Festus Fajemilo Foundation (Nigeria), National Council for Persons with Physical Disabilities in South Africa (South Africa), Spina Bifida hydrocephalus Information Networking Equality (SHINE, United Kingdom). Questionnaire reviewers: Martin Kaefer, MD, Richard C. Rink, MD, Kathryn Hubert Chan, MD MPH, Shelly King, CPNP, Melissa Young, CPNP, Sonia-Maria Szymanski, LLB (Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University Health). Health literacy review: Cynthia Latty, RN (Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University Health). Assistance with patient enrollment: John Paul Cap-olicchio, MD (Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University), Susan D. Ernst, MD (University of Michigan), Walid Farhat, MD (Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto), Dominic C. Frimberger, MD (The Children’s Hospital of Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma), Douglas A. Husmann, MD (Mayo Clinic), Micah Jacobs, MD (Children’s Medical Center of Dallas, UT Southwestern), David B. Joseph, MD (University of Alabama at Birmingham), Byron D. Joyner, MD (Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington), Melissa Kaufman, MD PhD (Vanderbilt University), Martin A. Koyle, MD (Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto), Andrew L. MacNeilly, MD (British Columbia Children’s Hospital, University of British Columbia), Peter Metcalf, MD (University of Alberta), Rodrigo Romao, MD (IWK Health Center, Dalhousie University), Brian A. Vanderbrink, MD (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, University of Cincinnati), Daniel Wood, MD (University College Hospital), Hadley Wood, MD (Cleveland Clinic, Case Western Reserve University), Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, MD PhD (Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi University), Elizabeth B. Yerkes, MD (Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University); Online questionnaire construction: Allison Muzzey (Indiana University). This study was supported by a Riley Children’s Hospital Foundation grant.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
