Socioeconomic risk factors for low birth weight newborns: A population-based study

Abstract

Low birth weight (LBW) is an important indicator of maternal health and poverty. This study explored the socioeconomic factors associated with LBW.

METHODS:

Data was collected from a 4-year maternal-newborn registry.

RESULTS:

There were 5,316 LBW and 54,029 normal birth weight (NBW). The prevalence of LBW was 9%. The Native women in the LBW group compared to non-native women were 10.4% (1784/5316) vs. 8.4% (3532/5316) with a P-value of 0.001. There were more illiterate mothers in the LBW compared to the NBW, respectively: 8.1% (1597/19497) vs. 7.5% (1763/23230) with a P-value of 0.001. Working mothers tend to have more LBW infants compared to mothers with NBW, 8.4% (1588/17217) vs. 7.9% (2532/31891) and P-value 0.001. Young mothers (<20 years old) with early childbearing had more LBW compared to older mothers, respectively 12.7% (180/1414) vs. 8.9% (5149/52919) P-value <0.001. Women with no antenatal care reported a high rate of LBW compared to women with regular antenatal care: 14.2% (516/3696) vs. 8.6% (4741/55691) P-value <0.001. LBW babies were born more from assisted conception pregnancies (38% compared to 8.4% of normal pregnancies) P-value <0.001. Smoking mothers scored higher with LBW at 13.6% vs. 8.3% and a P-value of 0.001. There were no differences between the two groups regarding religion, consanguinity, marital status, or family income.

CONCLUSION:

Risk factors for low birth weight can be improved by providing antenatal care, smoking cessation, optimizing high-risk pregnancy care, and governing assisted reproduction regulations.

Keywords

Low birth weight maternal newborn outcome socioeconomic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Parker

, Schoendorf

, Kiely

Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol [Internet]. 1994;4(4):271–8.

Barker

Maternal nutrition, fetal nutrition, and disease in later life. Nutrition [Internet]. 1997;13(9):807–13.

Blinder

Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour [Internet]. 1973;8(4):436.

Black

, Devereux

, Salvanes

From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Q J Econ [Internet]. 2007;122(1):409–39.

Pearl

, Braveman

, Abrams

The relationship of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics to birthweight among 5 ethnic groups in California. Am J Public Health [Internet]. 2001;91(11):1808–14.

Borrell

, Cirera

, Ricart

, Pasarín

, Salvador

Social inequalities in perinatal mortality in a Southern European city. Eur J Epidemiol [Internet] 2003;18(1):5–13. Available from:

Buka

, Brennan

, Rich-Edwards

, Raudenbush

, Earls

Neighborhood support and the birth weight of urban infants. Am J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2003;157(1):1–8.

Moser

, Li

, Power

Social inequalities in low birth weight in England and Wales: Trends and implications for future population health. J Epidemiol Community Health [Internet]. 2003;57(9):687–91.

Kramer

Determinants of low birth weight: Methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737.

10.

Bonellie

, Effect of maternal age smoking and deprivation on birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001;15(1):19–26.

11.

Cheung

, Yip

PSF

Social patterns of birth weight in Hong Kong, 1984–1997. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(7):1135–41.

12.

Krieger

Overcoming the absence of socio-economic data in medical records: Validation and application of census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992:86:703–10.

13.

Sloggett

, Joshi

Higher mortality in deprived areas: Community or personal disadvantage?

BMJ [Internet] 1994;309(6967):1470–4.

14.

Wilcox

On the importance–and the unimportance–of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001;30(6):1233–41.

15.

Europeristat Project. Perinatal Health Report 2008. www.europeristat.com.

16.

Johnston

, Clark

AJL

, Savage

Genetic factors contributing to birth weight. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [Internet]. 2002;86(1):F2–3.

17.

World Health Statistics 2010. World Health Organization. www.who.int/gho.

18.

Salameh

, Rahman

, Rifai

, Masoud

, Lutfi

, Abdouh

An analytic study of trends in perinatal and neonatal mortality rates in the State of Qatar over a 30 years period: A comparative study with regional and developed countries. A Comparative Study with Regional and Developed Countries. 1977;29:765–70.

19.

Rahman

, Salameh

, Bener

, El Ansari

Socioeconomic associations of improved maternal, neonatal, and perinatal survival in Qatar. Int J Womens Health [Internet]. 2010;2:311–8.

20.

Schoonjans

MedCalc’s Odds ratio calculator [Internet]. MedCalc. MedCalc Software; 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php.

21.

Social & economic factors [Internet]. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, [cited 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings/measures-data-sources/county-health-rankings-model/health-factors/social-and-economic-factors.

22.

Wang

, Geng

Effects of socioeconomic status on physical and psychological health: Lifestyle as a mediator. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2019;16(2):281.

23.

Abdulkader

, Ur Rahman

, Nimeri

The incidence of low birth weight and intrauterine growth restriction in relationship to maternal ethnicity and gestational age at birth - A PEARL study analysis from the State of Qatar. Qatar Med J [Internet]. 2012;2:32–7.

24.

Qatar [Internet]. Ceicdata.com. CEICdata.com; 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/qatar/health-statistics/qa-lowbirthweight-babies–of-birthswhere.