Abstract
Resveratrol improves healthspan and lifespan in many organisms. Several different targets and mechanisms of action have been proposed to explain the beneficial effects of resveratrol on healthspan and longevity, including the activation of a family of proteins known as sirtuins and its action as a calorie restriction mimetic. In this mini-review, we discuss some of the most recent findings to date in the resveratrol field and suggest three areas of future research based on those results.
For the past several decades a number of animal studies, meta-analyses, and recent human clinical trials have focused on the ability of resveratrol (RSV), a naturally occurring polyphenol compound, to combat a variety of diseases such as type-2 diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, neurodegeneration, and cancer (for a comprehensive summary, see [1]). The molecular and biological mechanisms by which RSV exerts positive effects on cardiometabolic health are still under investigation and have mainly been studied
Interestingly, RSV appears to have better pro-longevity effects in some organisms compared to others as evidenced by the fact that this polyphenol is most effective for extending longevity in yeast, worms, and killifish while mice and flies are not as responsive to treatment [3, 8]. Although there is evidence to suggest that RSV supplementation is beneficial to improve markers of cardiometabolic health in rodents and non-human primates, the translational potential of RSV has been controversial. For example, it has been argued that dosing and effective concentrations of RSV in rodent studies are much higher than the ones used in clinical trials. Another key argument points to the poor bioavailability of RSV and stresses the fact that clinical evaluation of RSV effectiveness has been limited by the small number of participants enrolled in underpowered studies [9]. Given the conflicting nature of these results, the purpose of this small review is to outline several recent findings in the field of RSV research and suggest a targeted approach for future investigations by focusing on several key areas: (1) Establishing effective durations of RSV treatment; (2) investigating RSV’s effects on vasculature; and (3) determining the common mechanisms between RSV supplementation and CR.
One key area of study in the field of RSV research should be the elucidation of effective length(s) of RSV treatment. A critical appraisal of the literature reveals that the effective duration of RSV treatment, rather than the dosage
There have been several investigations into the health outcomes of long-term RSV supplementation in Old World nonhuman primates (
There is limited information on the effects of long-term RSV supplementation is humans because most clinical trials to date have lasted less than 6 months in duration. For example, Berman et al. [17] recently detailed clinical trials assessing the therapeutic potential of RSV in cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Out of the 23 clinical trials investigated, only 3 had protocols that lasted longer than 6 months, while most were 1 to 3 months in duration. One recent meta-analysis focused on the aspect of length of treatment in humans by reporting clinical trials that lasted for more than 6 months. Male and female patients with metabolic syndrome saw significant improvement in plasma adiponectin, but not leptin, levels after RSV treatment for a period ≥ 6 months [18]. Long-term (12-months) RSV supplementation has been found to boost brain health in humans by decreasing Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid while simultaneously improving memory as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores [19].
There have been many clinical studies examining the role of RSV in diabetes, particularly by looking at markers of insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance. As indicated by Szkudelski and Szkudelski, most of the trials showed no effect and lasted less than 6 months [20]. Nevertheless, non-human primates on an obesogenic diet showed significant reduction in central arterial wall stiffness in response to long-term RSV supplementation [16]. There is now emerging evidence that RSV may partly contribute to improvements in several health measures in humans by improving vasculature integrity [21]. For example, RSV treatment led to an increase in neurovascular coupling capacity and improved memory in older adults [22]. Furthermore, ingestion of 125 mg RSV/day for 6 months improved 6-minute walking performance in older adults with peripheral artery disease (PAD) [23], although the authors concluded that the results did not quite reach clinical significance. Strikingly, short-term RSV supplementation for 6 weeks increased mitochondrial number and genetic markers of improved muscle vasculature function in older adults with impaired glucose tolerance, without alterations in insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism [24]. Given those positive results, we suggest that the mechanisms by which RSV improves vascular health might be a more focused direction of study until additional and more robust health benefits are confirmed in humans (i.e., improving the diabetic phenotype).
Earlier
To conclude, the positive effects of RSV on metabolic health highlights the need for continued clinical research, even though adverse responses of RSV supplementation in humans have been reported. This underscores the challenges of translating results from animal studies and preliminary findings to more stringent clinical trials [1, 33]. The results from rodent and non-human primate studies suggest that longer durations were the most effective with regard to lifespan extension and comprehensive measures of health in response to RSV. Furthermore, there is a need for improved understanding of the effects of RSV on vascular health given the positive results seen in mice and non-human primates. Finally, it is imperative to continue to study the similarities between long-term RSV supplementation and CR in humans.
Funding
This work was supported by the Aging and Alzheimer’s Research Institute, National Health and Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) grant numbers #571328, #1084267. MB and RdC were supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute on Aging, NIH. DW was partly supported by the American Australian Association (AAA) Education Fund.
