The wireless propagation model is important for accurate 5 G network deployment. However, the traditional wireless propagation model is faced with the problems of limited application scenarios, unstable prediction results and high marginal cost of improving accuracy. In order to solve these problems, this paper constructs new features from the original data from different angles, and uses the random forest model to select the core features, which are used to train the fusion model based on the linear weighted summation of regression models such as KNN, LightGBM, and Bagging. After training, the final fusion model is obtained, it solves the problems faced by traditional wireless propagation models. The results and analysis show that the fusion model outperforms the traditional wireless propagation models and the single models that constitutes the fusion model in terms of prediction accuracy and stability, and is not limited by scenarios and easy to deploy.
XiaoyuQ. and JiangyunW., Intelligent Wireless Propagation Model with Environmental Adaptability, 2020 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, 24–25 Oct. 2020, Springer, Singapore, Singapore, 2021, pp. 326–332.
2.
SantosT. and CarrijoG., Analysis of UHF signal propagation in the city of Uberlacircndia, using the propagation model ITU-R P.OkumuraHata and LogDistacircncia, IEEE Latin America Transactions17(9) (2019), 1560–1566.
3.
OnipeJ.A., AlenoghenaC.O., SalawuN. and PaulsonE.N., Optimal Propagation Models for Path-loss Prediction in a Mountainous Environment at 2100MHz, 2020 International Conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering and Computer Science, ICMCECS 2020, March 18, 2020 – March 21, 2020, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Ayobo, Ipaja, Lagos, Nigeria, 2020.
4.
JingyuanZ., LeweiX., RenZ., WenxueH. and YanshengW., Atoll-based Propagation Model Correction and Actual Measurement, 2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), 20–22 Dec. 2019, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019, pp. 662–666.
5.
WeiqingT., ChuanfeiQ., ZhichaoS. and HuiyuN., Design and Realization of an Okumura-Hata Model-Based ProgrammableAttenuator, 2019 12th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), 26–27 Oct. 2019, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019, pp. 20–23.
6.
ArthurJ.K., AmarteyA.T. and Brown-AcquayeW., Adaptation of the Okumura-Hata Model to the Environment of Accra, 2019 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing and Networks (ICCSPN), 29–31 May 2019, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019, p. 6 pp.
7.
GaoR., ZhaoY., WangY. and YanT., An improved propagation prediction model based on okumura-hata model, 8th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks, CENet 2018, August 17, 2018 – August 19, 2018, Springer Verlag, Shanghai, China, 2020, pp. 802–809.
8.
LiuB., PanL. and LiZ., Application of improved firefly algorithm in Okumura-Hata model updating, Telecommunication Engineering57(6) (2017), 661–665.
9.
BeireA.R., PitaH. and CotaN., Optimizing Propagation Models on Railway Communications Using Genetic Algorithms, Procedia Technology17 (2014), 50–57.
10.
FarhoudM., El-KeyiA. and SultanA., Empirical correction of the Okumura-Hata model for the 900MHz band in Egypt, 2013 International Conference on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), 19–21 June 2013, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2013, pp. 386–390.
11.
AkhpashevR.V. and AndreevA.V., COST 231 Hata adaptation model for urban conditions in LTE networks, 2016 17th International Conference of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices (EDM), 30 June–4 July 2016, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016, pp. 64–66.
12.
DrozdovaV.G. and AkhpashevR.V., Ordinary least squares in COST 231 Hata key parameters optimization base on experimental data, 2017 International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON), 18–22 Sept. 2017, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017, pp. 236–238.
13.
VermaR. and SainiG., Statistical tuning of Cost-231 Hata model at 1.8GHz over dense urban areas of Ghaziabad, 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 16–18 March 2016, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016, pp. 1220–1225.
14.
Martinez ZO.N., RodriguezC. and AriasO.M., Propagation characteristics of Managua city based on Standard Propagation Model (SPM) at 850MHz for 3G-WCDMA systems, 2014 IEEE Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXIV), 12–14 Nov. 2014, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014, p. 6 pp.
15.
PopoolaS.I., AtayeroA.A., FarukN., CalafateC.T., OlawoyinL.A. and MatthewsV.O., Standard propagation model tuning for path loss predictions in built-up environments, Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. 17th International Conference, 3–6 July 2017, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 363–375.
16.
de FreitasP.R. and Tertuliano FilhoH., Parameters fitting to standard propagation model (SPM) for long term evolution (LTE) using nonlinear regression method, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA), 26–28 June 2017, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017, pp. 84–88.
17.
GuangyuanL., YuanboC., WeiL., ChunlaiY., ShunqingX. and XiM., A method for calibrating standard propagation model in LTE system, 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT), 27–30 Oct. 2017, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017, pp. 636–639.
18.
LuY.Y., ChunW.G. and SongT.M., A wireless propagation model based on artificial intelligence technology, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics (ICCEM), 24–26 Aug. 2020, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020, pp. 273–274.
19.
AyadiM., Ben ZinebA. and TabbaneS., A UHF Path Loss Model Using Learning Machine for Heterogeneous Networks, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation65(7) (2017), 3675–3683.
20.
Chih-LinI., QiS., ZhimingL., SimingZ. and ShuangfengH., The Big-Data-Driven Intelligent Wireless Network: Architecture, Use Cases, Solutions, and Future Trends, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine12(4) (2017), 20–29.
21.
LiT., JianfengL., XueW. and LinQ., Feature engineering based intelligent wireless propagation model for RSRP prediction, 3rd International Symposium on Application of Materials Science and Energy Materials (SAMSE 2019), 30–31 Dec. 2019, IOP Publishing, UK, 2020, p. 042038 (10 pp.).
22.
SinghH., GuptaS., DhawanC. and MishraA., Path Loss Prediction in Smart Campus Environment: Machine Learning-based Approaches, 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020), 25–28 May 2020, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020, p. 5 pp.
23.
SotiroudisS.P. and SiakavaraK., Mobile radio propagation path loss prediction using Artificial Neural Networks with optimal input information for urban environments, 69(10) (2015), 1453–1463.
24.
CavalcantiB.J., CavalcanteG.A., De MendoncaL.M., CantanhedeG.M., De OliveiraM.M.M. and D’AssuncaoA.G., A hybrid path loss prediction model based on artificial neural networks using empirical models for LTE and LTE-A at 800MHz and MHz, Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications16(3) (2017), 708–722.
25.
MoazzeniT., A wireless propagation channel model with meteorological quantities using neural networks, 2006 IEEE GCC Conference, GCC 2006, IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
26.
LingchengD., HongtaoZ. and YanliZ., Propagation-model-free Coverage Evaluation via Machine Learning for Future 5G Networks, 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 9–12 Sept. 2018, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018, p. 5 pp.
27.
WuL.N., HeD.P., AiB., WangJ., QiH., GuanK. and ZhongZ.D., Artificial Neural Network Based Path Loss Prediction for Wireless Communication Network, IEEE Access8 (2020), 199523–199538.
28.
OjoS., ImoizeA. and AlienyiD., Radial basis function neural network path loss prediction model for LTE networks in multitransmitter signal propagation environments, Int J Commun Syst34(3) (2021), 26.
29.
SotiroudisS.P., SarigiannidisP., GoudosS.K. and SiakavaraK., Fusing Diverse Input Modalities for Path Loss Prediction: A Deep Learning Approach, IEEE Access9 (2021), 30441–30451.
30.
WangX., WangS.-h., ZhangH.-y., WangJ.-q. and LiL., The Recommendation Method for Hotel Selection Under Traveller Preference Characteristics: A Cloud-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support Model, Group Decision and Negotiation, (2021).
31.
WangX.-K., ZhangH.-Y., WangJ.-Q., LiJ.-B. and LiL., Extended TODIM-PROMETHEE II method with hesitant probabilistic information for solving potential risk evaluation problems of water resource carrying capacity, Expert Systems38(4) (2021), e12681.
32.
YeşilkanatC.M., Spatio-temporal estimation of the daily cases of COVID-19 in worldwide using random forest machine learning algorithm, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals140 (2020), 110210.
33.
PrionS.K. and HaerlingK.A., Making Sense of Methods and Measurements: Simple Linear Regression, Clinical Simulation in Nursing48 (2020), 94–95.
34.
ĆalasanM., Abdel AleemS.H.E. and ZobaaA.F., On the root mean square error (RMSE) calculation for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models: A novel exact analytical solution based on Lambert W function, Energy Conversion and Management210 (2020), 112716.
