In recent years, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems (IT2 FLSs) have become a hot topic for the capability of coping with uncertainties. Compared with the centroid type-reduction (TR), investigating the center-of-sets (COS) TR of IT2 FLSs is more favorable for applying IT2 FLSs. Actually, it is still an open question for comparing Karnik-Mendel (KM) types of algorithms and other types of alternative algorithms for COS TR. This paper gives the block of fuzzy reasoning, COS TR, and defuzzification of IT2 FLSs based on Nagar-Bardini (NB), Nie-Tan (NT) and Begian-Melek-Mendel (BMM) noniterative algorithms. Six simulation experiments are used to show the performances of three types of noniterative algorithms. The proposed noniterative algorithms can obtain much higher computational efficiencies compared with the KM algorithms, which give the potential value for designing T2 FLSs.
TaoC.W., TaurJ.S., ChangC.W. and ChangY.H., Simplified type-2 fuzzy sliding controller for wing rocket system, Fuzzy Sets and Systems207(16) (2012), 111–129.
2.
HsuC.H. and JuangC.F., Evolutionary robot wall-following control using type-2 fuzzy controller with species-de-activated continuous ACO, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(1) (2013), 100–112.
3.
ZhaoT. and XiaoJ., State feedback control of interval type-2 Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems via interval type-2 regional switching fuzzy controllers, International Journal of Systems Science46(15) (2015), 2756–2769.
4.
BarkatS., TlemcaniA. and NouriH., Noninteracting adaptive control of PMSM using interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems19(5) (2011), 925–936.
5.
WangD.Z. and ChenY., Study on permanent magnetic drive forecasting by designing Takagi Sugeno Kang type interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(6) (2018), 2011–2023.
6.
KhosraviA. and Nahavandi.S., Load forecasting using interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: optimal type reduction, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics10(2) (2014), 1055–1063.
7.
ChenY., WangD.Z. and TongS.C., Forecasting studies by designing Mamdani interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: with the combination of BP algorithms and KM algorithms, Neurocomputing174(part b) (2016), 1133–1146.
8.
KhosraviA., NahavandiS., CreightonD., et al., Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems for load forecasting: a comparative study, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems27(3) (2012), 1274–1282.
9.
LiR., JiangC., ZhuF., et al., Traffic flow data forecasting based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets theory, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica3(2) (2016), 141–148.
10.
ZarandiM.H.F., RezaeeB. and TurksenI.B., A type-2 fuzzy rule-based expert system model for stock price analysis, Expert Systems with Applications36(1) (2009), 139–154.
11.
BernardoD., HagrasH. and TsangE., A genetic type-2 fuzzy logic based system for the generation of summarized linguistic predictive models for financial applications, Soft Computing17(12) (2013), 2185–2201.
12.
SafarinejadianB., GhaneP. and MonirvaghefiH., Fault detection in non-linear systems based on type-2 fuzzy logic, International Journal of Systems Sciences45(3) (2015), 394–404.
13.
LindaO. and ManicM., Interval type-2 fuzzy voter design for fault tolerant systems, Information Sciences181(14) (2011), 2933–2950.
14.
LeeC.S., WangM.H. and HagrasH., Type-2 fuzzy ontology and its application to personal diabetic-diet recommendation, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems18(2) (2010), 316–328.
15.
CervantesL. and CastilloO., Type-2 fuzzy logic aggregation of multiple fuzzy controllers for airplane flight control, Information Sciences324 (2015), 247–256.
16.
HagrasH. and WagnerC., Towards the wide spread use of type-2 fuzzy logic systems in real world applications, IEEE Computational Intelligent Magazine7(3) (2012), 14–24.
17.
MendelJ.M., Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 2001.
18.
KarnikN.N. and MendelJ.M., Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set, Information Sciences132(1) (2001), 195–220.
19.
MendelJ.M., On KM algorithms for solving type-2 fuzzy set problems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(3) (2013), 426–446.
20.
GreenfieldS., ChiclanaF., CouplandS. and JohnR., The collapsing method of defuzzification for discretised interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Information Sciences179(13) (2009), 2055–2069.
21.
WuH. and MendelJ.M., Uncertainty bounds and their use in the design of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems10(5) (2002), 622–639.
22.
EI-NagarA.M. and EI-BardiniM., Simplified interval type-2 fuzzy logic system based on new type-reduction, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27(4) (2014), 1999–2010.
23.
ChenY., Study on weighted Nagar-Bardini algorithms for centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems34(4) (2018), 2417–2428.
24.
LiJ.W., JohnR., CouplandS. and KendallG., On Nie-Tan operator and type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(2) (2018), 1036–1039.
25.
ChenY. and WangD.Z., Study on centroid type-reduction of general type-2 fuzzy logic systems with weighted Nie-Tan algorithms, Soft Computing22(22) (2018), 7659–7678.
26.
BiglarbegianM., MelekW.W. and MendelJ.M., On the robustness of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems in modeling, Information Sciences181(7) (2011), 1325–1347.
27.
BiglarbegianM., MelekW.W. and MendelJ.M., On the stability of interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, Cybernetics40(3) (2010), 798–818.
28.
ChenY., Study on sampling-based discrete noniterative algorithms for centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Soft Computing24(15) (2020), 11819–11828.
29.
KarnikN.N., MendelJ.M. and LiangQ., Type-2 fuzzy logic systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems7(6) (1999), 643–658.
30.
MendelJ.M., Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine2(2) (2007), 20–29.
31.
WangT., ChenY. and TongS.C., Fuzzy reasoning models and algorithms on type-2 fuzzy sets, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control4(10) (2008), 2451–2460.
32.
MéndezG.M. and HernándezM.D.L.A., Hybrid learning for interval type-2 fuzzy systems based on orthogonal least-squares and back-propagation methods, Information Sciences179(13) (2009), 2146–2157.
33.
WangD.Z. and ChenY., Study on permanent magnetic drive forecasting by designing Takagi Sugeno Kang type interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(6) (2018), 2011–2023.
34.
HernandezM.d.l.A., MelinP., MéndezG.M., CastilloO. and López-JuarezI., A hybrid learning method composed by the orthogonal least-squares and the back-propagation learning algorithms for interval A2-C1 type-1 non-singleton type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems, Soft Computing19(3) (2015), 661–678.
35.
MendelJ.M., General type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple: a tutorial, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22(5) (2014), 1162–1182.
36.
ChenY., Study on centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems based on noniterative algorithms, Complexity2019 (2019), Article ID 7325053, 1–12.
37.
ChenY., Study on sampling based discrete Nie-Tan algorithms for computing the centroids of general type-2 fuzzy sets, IEEE Access7(1) (2019), 156984–156992.
38.
KhanesarM.A., JalalianA. and Kaynak.O., Improving the speed of center of set type-reduction in interval type-2 fuzzy systems by eliminating the need for sorting, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems25(5) (2017), 1193–1206.
39.
GreenfieldS. and ChiclanaF., Accuracy and complexity evaluation of defuzzification strategies for the discretised interval type-2 fuzzy set, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning54(8) (2013), 1013–1033.
40.
Ontiveros-RoblesE., MelinP. and CastilloO., New methodology to approximate type-reduction based on a continuous root-finding karnik mendel algorithm, Algorithms10(3) (2017), 77–96.
41.
CastilloO., Amador-AnguloL., CastroJ.R., et al., A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems, Information Sciences354(c) (2016), 257–274.
42.
Ontiveros-RoblesE., MelinP. and CastilloO., Comparative analysis of noise robustness of type 2 fuzzy logic controllers, Kybernetika54(1) (2018), 175–201.
43.
CervantesL. and CastilloO., Type-2 fuzzy logic aggregation of multiple fuzzy controllers for airplane flight control, Information Sciences324 (2015), 247–256.
44.
CastilloO., MelinP., OntiverosE., et al., A high-speed interval type 2 fuzzy system approach for dynamic parameter adaptation in metaheuristics, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence85 (2019), 666–680.
45.
WuD.R. and MendelJ.M., Recommendations on designing practical interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence85 (2019), 182–193.
46.
TongS.C. and LiY.M., Observer-based adaptive fuzzy backstepping control of uncertain pure-feedback systems, Science China Information Sciences57(1) (2014), 1–14.
47.
TongS.C. and Li.Y.M., Robust adaptive fuzzy backstepping output feedback tracking control for nonlinear dynamic uncertainties, Science China Information Sciences53(2) (2010), 307–324.
48.
ChenY. and Wang.D.Z., Forecasting by general type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with QPSO algorithms International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems15(6) (2017), 2950–2958.
49.
ChenY., WangD.Z. and Ning.W., Forecasting by TSK general type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with genetic algorithms, Optimal Control Applications and Methods39(1) (2018), 393–409.
50.
GaxiolaF., MelinP., ValdezF., CastroJ.R. and CastilloO., Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO, Applied Soft Computing38 (2016), 860–871.
51.
ChenY. and WangD.Z., Forecasting by designing Mamdani general type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with quantum particle swarm optimization algorithms, Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(10) (2019), 2886–2896.
52.
MendelJ.M. and LiuX.W., Simplified interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(6) (2013), 1056–1069.
53.
ChenY., WuJ.X. and LanJ., Study on reasonable initialization enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms for centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems, AIMS Mathematics5(6) (2020), 6149–6168.
54.
MorenoJ.E., SanchezM.A., MendozaO., et al., Design of an interval type-2 fuzzy model with justifiable uncertainty, Information Sciences513 (2020), 206–221.
55.
OntiverosE., MelinP. and Castillo.O., Comparative study of interval type-2 and general type-2 fuzzy systems in medical diagnosis, Information Sciences525 (2020), 37–53.
56.
OntiverosE., MelinP. and CastilloO., Higher order α-planes integration: a new approach to computational cost reduction of general type-2 fuzzy systems, 74 (2018), 186–197.
57.
ChenY., Study on weighted Nagar-Bardini algorithms for centroid type-reduction of general type-2 fuzzy logic systems, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(5) (2019), 6527–6544.
58.
GargH and SinghS., Algorithm for solving group decision-making problems based on the similarity measures under type 2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets environment, Soft Computing24(10) (2020), 7361–7381.
59.
SinghS. and GargH., Symmetric triangular interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their applications in multi criteria decision making, Symmetry10(401) (2018), 1–27.
60.
SinghS. and GargH., Distance measures between type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to multicriteria decision-making process, Applied Intelligence46(4) (2017), 788–799.
