In recent years, fuzzy identification based on system identification theory has become a hot academic topic. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems (IT2 FLSs) have become a rising technology. This paper designs a type of Nagar-Bardini (NB) structure-based singleton IT2 FLSs for fuzzy identification problems. The antecedents of primary membership functions of IT2 FLSs are chosen as Gaussian type-2 primary membership functions with uncertain standard deviations. Then, the back propagation algorithms are used to tune the parameters of IT2 FLSs according to the chain rule of derivation. Compared with the type-1 fuzzy logic systems, simulation studies show that the proposed IT2 FLSs can obtain better abilities of generalization for fuzzy identification problems.
BiglarbegianMMelekWWMendelJM (2010) On the stability of interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics40(3): 798–818.
2.
BiglarbegianMMelekWWMendelJM (2011) Design of novel interval type-2 fuzzy controllers for modular and reconfigurable robots: theory and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics58(4): 1371–1384.
3.
CastroJLDelgadoM (1996) Fuzzy systems with defuzzification are universal approximators. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics26(1): 149–152.
4.
CastilloOMelinP (2012) A review on the design and optimization of interval type-2 fuzzy controllers. Applied Soft Computing12(4): 1267–1278.
5.
ChenYWangDZ (2018) Study on centroid type-reduction of general type-2 fuzzy logic systems with weighted enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms. Soft Computing22(4): 1361–1380.
6.
ChenYWangDZTongSC (2016) Forecasting studies by designing Mamdani interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: with the combination of BP algorithms and KM algorithms. Neurocomputing174(b): 1133–1146.
7.
CastilloOAmador-AnguloLCastroJR, et al. (2016) A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems. Information Sciences354(c): 257–274.
8.
CastilloOMelinPOntiverosE, et al. (2019) A high-speed interval type 2 fuzzy system approach for dynamic parameter adaptation in metaheuristics. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence85: 666–680.
9.
CervantesLCastilloO (2015) Type-2 fuzzy logic aggregation of multiple fuzzy controllers for airplane flight control. Information Sciences324: 247–256.
10.
ChenY (2018) Study on weighted Nagar-Bardini algorithms for centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems34(4): 2417–2428.
11.
ChenY (2019) Study on sampling based discrete Nie-Tan algorithms for computing the centroids of general type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Access7(1): 156984–156992.
12.
ChenY (2020) Study on sampling-based discrete noniterative algorithms for centroid type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. Soft Computing24(15): 11819–11828.
13.
ChenYWangDZ (2019) Forecasting by designing Mamdani general type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with quantum particle swarm optimization algorithms. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control41(10): 2886–2896.
14.
ChenYWangDZNingW (2018) Forecasting by TSK general type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimized with genetic algorithms. Optimal Control Applications & Methods39(1): 393–409.
15.
EI-NagarAMEI-BardiniM (2014) Simplified interval type-2 fuzzy logic system based on new type-reduction. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27(4): 1999–2010.
16.
GaxiolaFMelinPValdezF, et al. (2016) Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO. Applied Soft Computing38: 860–871.
17.
GreenfieldSChiclanaF (2013) Accuracy and complexity evaluation of defuzzification strategies for the discretised interval type-2 fuzzy set. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning54(8): 1013-1033.
18.
GreenfieldSChiclanaFCouplandS, et al. (2009) The collapsing method of defuzzification for discretised interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences179(13): 2055–2069.
19.
HagrasH (2007) Type-2 FLSs: a new generation of fuzzy controllers. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine2(1): 30–43.
20.
HernandezMMelinPMéndezGM, et al. (2015) A hybrid learning method composed by the orthogonal least-squares and the back-propagation learning algorithms for interval A2-C1 type-1 non-singleton type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems. Soft Computing19(3): 661–678.
21.
HsuCHJuangCF (2013) Evolutionary robot wall-following control using type- 2 fuzzy controller with species-de-activated continuous ACO. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(1): 100–112.
22.
JuGChenL (1995) Fuzzy model identification and self-learning algorithm for dynamic systems. Acta Automatica Sinica21(6): 749–753.
23.
KaufmanAGuptaMM (1987) Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
24.
KhanesarMAJalalianAKaynakO (2017) Improving the speed of center of set type-reduction in interval type-2 fuzzy systems by eliminating the need for sorting. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems25(5): 1193–1206.
25.
KhosraviANahavandiS (2014) Load forecasting using interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: Optimal type reduction. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics10(2): 1055–1063.
26.
LiuXWMendelJMWuDR (2012) Study on enhanced Karnik-Mendel algorithms: Initialization explanations and computation improvements. Information Sciences184(1): 75–91.
27.
LiJWJohnRCouplandS, et al. (2018) On Nie-Tan operator and type-reduction of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(2): 1036–1039.
28.
MendelJM (2001) Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
MendelJM (2004) Computing derivatives in interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems12(1): 84–98.
30.
MendelJM (2013) On KM algorithms for solving type-2 fuzzy set problems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(3): 426–446.
31.
MendelJMLiuFL (2007) Super-exponential convergence of the Karnik-Mendel algorithms for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems15(2): 309–320.
MendozaOMelinPCastilloO (2009) Interval type-2 fuzzy logic and modular networks for face recognition applications. Applied Soft Computing9(4): 1377–1387.
34.
NarendaKSParthasarathyK (1990) Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks11(1): 4–27.
35.
Ontiveros-RoblesEMelinPCastilloO (2017) New methodology to approximate type-reduction based on a continuous root-finding karnik mendel algorithm. Algorithms10(3): 77–96.
36.
Ontiveros-RoblesEMelinPCastilloO (2018) Comparative analysis of noise robustness of type 2 fuzzy logic controllers. Kybernetika54(1): 175–201.
37.
TaoCWTaurJSChangCW, et al. (2012) Simplified type-2 fuzzy sliding controller for wing rocket system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems207(16): 111–129.
38.
TongSCLiYM (2010) Robust adaptive fuzzy backstepping output feedback tracking control for nonlinear system with dynamic uncertainties. Science China Information Sciences53(2): 307–324.
39.
TongSCLiYM (2014) Observer-based adaptive fuzzy backstepping control of uncertain pure-feedback systems. Science China Information Sciences57(1): 1–14.
40.
WangDZChenY (2018) Study on permanent magnetic drive forecasting by designing Takagi Sugeno Kang type interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(6): 2011–2023.
41.
WangL X (1992) Fuzzy systems are universal approximators. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 1992, pp. 1163–1170, doi: 10.1109/FUZZY.1992.258721.
42.
WangTChenYTongSC (2008) Fuzzy reasoning models and algorithms on type-2 fuzzy sets. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control4(10): 2451–2461.
43.
WuDRMendelJM (2019) Recommendations on designing practical interval type-2 fuzzy systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence85: 182–193.
