Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The eco-economic activity modeling is an effective method to analyze the eco-economic system. From the existing models, it can be seen that the disadvantages of eco-economic activity modeling are that the model evaluation accuracy is not high, and the system stability is poor. In order to improve the evaluation effect of the ecological economic activity, based on the machine learning algorithm, this study establishes a PNN evaluation model based on the probabilistic neural network classification principle. Moreover, in this study, a certain number of learning samples are generated by random interpolation of evaluation index standards, and then Matlab software is used to simulate the training and test of the model, and the feasibility and effectiveness of the model are verified by statistical indicators. In addition, this study combines the actual case to analyze the performance of the model and analyze the test results by statistical analysis methods. The research results show that the model proposed in this study has certain effects and high stability.

Keywords

Machine learning ecological economy economic activity simulation analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nagy

and Pipek

, An economic prediction of the finer resolution level wavelet coefficients in electronic structure calculations[J], Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(47) (2015), 31558–31565.

and Huafeng

, Quantitative analysis of regional economic indicators prediction based on grey relevance degree and fuzzy mathematical model[J], Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 37(2) (2019), 1–14.

, Dong

, Sui

, et al., Fleet economic life prediction: A probabilistic approach including load spectrum variation and structural property variation[J], Engineering Fracture Mechanics 163 (2016), 189–205.

Paredes

, Rodrigues

G.C.

, Alves

, et al., Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies[J], Agricultural Water Management 135 (2014), 27–39.

Karanikić

, Mladenović

, Sokolov-Mladenović

, et al., Retraction Note: Prediction of economic growth by extreme learning approach based on science and technology transfer[J], Quality & Quantity 53(2) (2019), 1095–1096.

Van Giessen

, Wilcher

, Peters

, et al. Health economic evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. a systematic review[J], Value in Health 17(7) (2014), A560.

Barde

, Back to the Future: Economic Self-Organisation and Maximum Entropy Prediction[J], Computational Economics 45(2) (2015), 337–358.

Ferramosca

, Limon

and Camacho

E.F.

, Economic MPC for a Changing Economic Criterion for Linear Systems[J], Automatic Control IEEE Transactions on 59(10) (2014), 2657–2667.

Zhou

, Lai

K.K.

and Yen

, Bankruptcy prediction using SVM models with a new approach to combine features selection and parameter optimisation[J], International Journal of Systems Science 45(1–3) (2014), 241–253.

10.

Bhattacharya

, Mukhoti

and Konar

, Learning regularity in an economic time-series for structure prediction[J], Applied Soft Computing 76 (2019), 31–44.

11.

Geng

, Wei

, Zhang

, et al., Analysis and Prediction of the Coupling Coordination Relationship between Tourism and Air Environment: Yangtze River Economic Zone in China as Example[J], Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2020(10) (2020), 1–15.

12.

H.L.

, Ng

K.T.W.

and Bolingbroke

, Time-lagged effects of weekly climatic and socio-economic factors on ANN municipal yard waste prediction models[J], Waste Management 84(FEB.) (2019), 129–140.

13.

Zhou

, Luo

, Jain

D.K.

, Lan

and Zhang

, Double-Domain Imaging and Adaption for Person Re-Identification, IEEE Access 7 (2019), 103336–103345.

14.

Zhao

and Sun

, Government subsidies-based profits distribution pattern analysis in closed-loop supply chain using game theory, Neural Computing and Applications 32(6) (2020), 1715–1724.

15.

Rajsic

, Weersink

, Navabi

, et al., Economics of genomic selection: the role of prediction accuracy and relative genotyping costs[J], Euphytica 210(2) (2016), 1–18.

16.

Jahedpari

, Rahwan

, Hashemi

, et al., Online Prediction via Continuous Artificial Prediction Markets[J], Intelligent Systems, IEEE 32(1) (2017), 61–68.

17.

Daksiya

, Su

H.T.

, Chang

Y.H.

, et al., Incorporating socio-economic effects and uncertain rainfall in flood mitigation decision using MCDA[J], Natural Hazards 87(1) (2017), 515–531.

18.

Liang

and Yang

, Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China, Sustain Comput Informatics Syst 21 (2019), 1–9.

19.

Gordini

, A genetic algorithm approach for SMEs bankruptcy prediction: Empirical evidence from Italy[J], Expert Systems with Application 41(14) (2014), 6433–6445.

20.

Ferramosca

, González

A.H.

and Limon

, Offset-free multi-model economic model predictive control for changing economic criterion[J], Journal of Process Control 54 (2017), 1–13.

Modeling of the ecological economic activity based on machine learning

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References