With the rapid development of knowledge economy, the importance of knowledge sharing in the field of higher education is becoming more and more prominent, and university teachers as an important subject, the evaluation of their knowledge sharing level can better understand the status quo and problems of knowledge sharing of university teachers and take timely measures to make greater contributions to the development of universities and social progress. This paper selects willingness of knowledge sharing, ability of knowledge sharing, atmosphere for knowledge sharing, content of knowledge sharing, and the effectiveness of knowledge sharing as indicators for improvement and integration of AHP, Critic, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The weights obtained are coupled and assigned, and finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate and rank the level of knowledge sharing among university teachers. Based on the weight of the five indicators, the article determines the impact of these indicators on the level of knowledge sharing among university teachers and provides corresponding suggestions, hoping to provide references for universities and relevant government departments.
SinghSKGuptaSBussoDKambojS. Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J Bus Res.2021; 128: 788-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040.
2.
AhmedYAAhmadMNAhmadNZakariaNH. Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. Telematics Inform.2019; 37: 72-112. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.015.
3.
BarnesSJ. Information management research and practice in the post-COVID-19 world. Int J Inf Manage.2020; 55: 102175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102175.
4.
HoferSINistorNScheibenzuberC. Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations. Comput Hum Behav.2021; 121: 106789. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789.
5.
JacksonNC. Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Bus Horiz.2019; 62(6): 761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.002.
6.
LackaEWongTHaddoudMY. Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education. Comput Educ.2021; 163: 104099. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099.
7.
NisarTMPrabhakarGStrakovaL. Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations. J Bus Res.2019; 94: 264-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.005.
8.
Ngoc HoiV. Augmenting student engagement through the use of social media: The role of knowledge sharing behaviour and knowledge sharing self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environ.2023; 31(7): 4021-33. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1948871.
9.
GamlathSWilsonT. Dimensions of student-to-student knowledge sharing in universities. Knowledge Manage Res Pract.2022; 20(4): 542-56. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1838961.
10.
RasheedMIMalikMJPitafiAHIqbalJAnserMKAbbasM. Usage of social media, student engagement, and creativity: The role of knowledge sharing behavior and cyberbullying. Comput Educ.2020; 159: 104002. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104002.
11.
YePLiuLTanJ. Creative leadership, innovation climate and innovation behaviour: the moderating role of knowledge sharing in management. Eur J Innov Manage.2022; 25(4): 1092-114. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0199.
12.
Abou-ShoukMZoairNAburummanAAbdel-JalilM. The effect of personality traits and knowledge-sharing on employees’ innovative performance: A comparative study of Egypt and Jordan. Tourism Manage Perspect.2022; 44: 101024. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101024.
13.
LePBNguyenDTN. Stimulating knowledge-sharing behaviours through ethical leadership and employee trust in leadership: the moderating role of distributive justice. J Knowl Manage.2023; 27(3): 820-41. doi: 10.1108/JKM-06-2021-0462.
14.
SungSYLiYXChoiJN. Upward social comparison toward proactive and reactive knowledge sharing: The roles of envy and goal orientations. J Bus Res.2024; 170: 114314. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114314.
15.
XuZGongJQuYSunX. Using leader affiliative humor to encourage employee knowledge sharing: The multilevel role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy and team psychological safety. J Innov Knowl.2023; 8(3): 100408. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100408.
16.
WangXZhangSQiuLZhangGLiuN. What factors influence users’ willingness to share knowledge in online groups and how? J Knowl Econ.2022; 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s13132-022-01082-y.
17.
ZhaoLDetlorB. Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowl Manag Res Pract.2023; 21(1): 197-209. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1866444.
18.
AkramTLeiSHaiderMJHussainST. The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. J Innov Knowl.2020; 5(2): 117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001.
19.
TalebizadehSMHosseingholizadehRBellibaşMŞ. Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Stud Educ Eval. 2021; 68: 100970. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100970.
20.
Al-KurdiOFEl-HaddadehREldabiT. The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. Int J Inf Manag.2020; 50: 217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018.
21.
Hove LangdalT. Schoolteachers’ experiences of knowledge sharing when teaching new education programs. J Workplace Learn.2023; 35(7): 585-598. doi: 10.1108/JWL-10-2022-0135.
22.
LinCYHuangCK. Understanding the antecedents of knowledge sharing behaviour and its relationship to team effectiveness and individual learning. Australas J Educ Technol.2020; 36(2): 89-104. doi: 10.14742/ajet.4549.
23.
WuYWangJJiSSongZKeY. Optimal investment selection of industrial and commercial rooftop distributed PV project based on combination weights and cloud-TODIM model from SMEs’ perspectives. J Clean Prod.2019; 234: 534-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.249.
24.
LePBLeiH. Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support. J Knowl Manag.2019; 23(3): 527-547. doi: 10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0568.
25.
MahdiORNassarIAAlmsafirMK. Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. J Bus Res.2019; 94: 320-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013.
26.
LiuFLuYWangP. Why knowledge sharing in scientific research teams is difficult to sustain: An interpretation from the interactive perspective of knowledge hiding behavior. Front Psychol.2020; 11: 537833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537833.
27.
AzeemMAhmedMHaiderSSajjadM. Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technol Soc.2021; 66: 101635. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101635.
28.
WangCHuQ. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation.2020; 94: 102010. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.002.
