Past studies have tended to consider the relationships between presenteeism, physical activity and psychosomatic symptoms in a partial manner and not as a whole.
OBJECTIVE:
This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between physical activity, psychosomatic symptoms and presenteeism, in order to increase the visibility of presenteeism and promote workplace health.
METHODS:
Two questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire and Work Limitations Questionnaire) with a set of physical activity questions were administered on the sample of 514 employees.
RESULTS:
The results showed a statistically significant relationship between presenteeism and some variables of physical activity, as well as between presenteeism and psychosomatic symptoms. Further results showed a statistically significant association between psychosomatic symptoms and some variables of physical activity. General evaluation (adequacy) of physical activity, and lack of general, aerobic physical activity proved to be important predictors of presenteeism, while general, aerobic physical activity also predicted psychosomatic symptoms. Analysis of the results revealed that psychosomatic symptoms moderate the relationship between physical activity and presenteeism.
CONCLUSIONS:
The article points out that employees with health problems have a lower percentage of productive time than healthy employees. However, developing an active lifestyle can be a cost-effective measure to cope with presenteeism and promote psychophysical health among employees.
GoetzelRZ, LongSR, OzminkowskiRJ, HawkinsK, WangS, LynchW. Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U. S. employers. J Occup Med. 2004;46:398–412. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000121151.40413.bd
7.
ChapmanLS. Presenteeism and its role in worksite health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19:1–8. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.4.tahp-1
8.
NajafiN. Presenteeism in Australian workforce; impact of psychological flexibility and autonomous motivation. In: SBS HDR Student Conference. Sydney, 2011.
9.
AboagyeE, BjörklundC, GustafssonK, HagbergJ, AronssonG, MarklundS, LeineweberC, BergströmG. Exhaustion and impaired work performance in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(11):e438–e444. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001701
10.
DemeroutiE, Le BlancPM, BakkerAB, SchaufeliWB, HoxJ. Present but sick: a three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Dev Int. 2009;14:50–68. doi: 10.1108/13620430910933574
11.
SkagenK, CollinsAM. The consequences of sickness presenteeism on health and wellbeing over time: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2016;161:169–177. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.005
12.
MayouRA, BassC, SharpeM. Treatment of Functional Somatic Symptoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
NisarH, SrivastavaR. Fundamental concept of psychosomatic disorders: a review. IJCMSR. 2017;3:12–8.
15.
ShoenbergP. Psychosomatics. The Uses of Psychotherapy. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
16.
IhemeFO, NnajiGA, MosesLA, OgunfowokanO. Effect of somatization disorder on social and work place functioning among upper socio-economic class adults attending outpatient clinic in national hospital. FamPract. 2014;1. doi: 10.7243/2056-5690-1-1
17.
AyalaE, CarneroAM. Determinants of burnout in acute and critical care military nursing personnel: a cross sectional study from Peru. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54408. doi: 10.1371/journal
18.
MojoyinolaJK. Effects of job stress on health, personal and work behaviour of nurses in public hospitals in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Stud Ethno Med. 2008;2:143–8. doi: 10.1080/09735070.2008.11886326
19.
WangJ, SmailesE, SareenJ, FickGH, SchmitzN, PattenSB. The prevalence of mental disorders in the working population over the period of global economic crisis. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55:598–605. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500908
20.
BilbanM. Ocenjevanje delazmožnosti. In Romih J, Žimtek A, editors. Duševne motnje in zmožnosti za delo. Begunje: Psihiatrična bolničnica. 1998:17-37.
21.
SonnentagS. Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: the benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21:114–8. doi: 10.1177/0963721411434979
22.
DrevA. Gibanje: telesno dejavni vsak dan. Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije, 2013.
23.
PitSW, HansenV. The relationship between lifestyle, occupational health, and work-related factors with presenteeism amongst general practitioners, Arch Environ Occup Health2016;71(1):49–56. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2014.998329
MartinsenEW. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression. Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62:25–9. doi: 10.1080/08039480802315640
26.
PaluskaSA, SchwenkTL. Physical activity and mental health: current concepts. Sports Med. 2000;29:167–80. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029030-00003
27.
TaylorCB, SallisJF, NeedleR. The relation of physical activity and exercise to mental health. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:195–202.
28.
BrownDW, BalluzLS, HeathGW, MoriartyDG, FordES, GilesWH, MokdadAH. Associations between recommended levels of physical activity and healthrelated quality of life. Findings from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. Prev Med. 2003;37:520–8. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00179-8
29.
SchultzAB, EdingtonDW. Employee health and presenteeism: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:547–79. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9096-x
30.
LernerD, Amick IIIBC, RogersWH, MalspeisS, BungayK, CynnD. The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:72–85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009
31.
Mapi Research Trust.Work Limitations Questionnaire Version 1.0 - Scaling and Scoring. Lyon: Mapi Research Trust, 2018.
KroenkeK, SpitzerRL, WilliamsJB. The PHQ- validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:258–266. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008
34.
PallantJ. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Maidenhead, Australia: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill, 2011.
35.
BalgiuBA. The psychometric properties of the Big Five inventory-10 (BFI-10) including correlations with subjective and psychological well-being. GJPR. 2018;8(2):61-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.18844/gjpr.v8i2.3434.
36.
EisingaR, GrotenhuisMT, PelzerB. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
37.
KaraniA, Chandrashekhar DeshpandeR, JayswalM. Work-life balance and psychological distress: A structural equation modeling approach. HSM. 2021;1-15. doi: 10.3233/HSM-201145
38.
BrownHE, RydeGC, GilsonND, BurtonN, BrownWJ. Objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity in office employees: relationships with presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;55:945–953. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829178bf
39.
BurtonWN, ChenCY, LiX, SchultzAB, AbrahamssonH. The association of self-reported employee physical activity with metabolic syndrome, health care costs, absenteeism, and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56:919–26. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000257
40.
WillidenM, SchofieldG, DuncanS. Establishing links between health and productivity in the New Zealand workforce. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:545–50. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31824fe0c8
41.
Hvalic-TouzeryS, BabnikK, PivacS, Skela-SavicB. Measuring individual and work-related correlates of employees’ well-being with a short form of the psychological general well-being index: A pilot validation study in Slovenia. HSM. 2020;36(2):265–75. doi: 10.3233/HSM-190721
42.
DeciEL, RyanRM. Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. NewYork: Plenum, 1985.
43.
WebsterR, LiuR, KarimullinaK, HallI, AmlôtR, RubinGJ. A systematic review of infectious illness presenteeism: prevalence, reasons and risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7138-x.
