Internal social capital in the cooperative firms has emerged in recent years as an important concept for improving innovation performance.
OBJECTIVE:
We explore whether the cohabitation of the different interacting social groups, namely cooperative members, and non-cooperative members, will generate disparate impacts on the circumstance for enhanced innovation.
METHODOLOGY:
A sample of 180 cooperative firms in Ethiopia, with two respondents per firm, consisting of one adherent and one non-adherent member, we reflected on the theory of social capital, and by adopting a relational, cognitive, and structural concept. We conducted Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through PLS to analyze the importance of each group for innovation performance.
RESULTS:
Our results suggested that the internal interaction between adherent and non-adherent members of cooperative enterprises positively influences their “innovation performance”. The findings also revealed that non-adherent members were more involved in building innovation than adherent members.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results provide empirical evidence that internal social factors are essential assets for effective innovation in cooperatives, and established a new line of research within an empirical perspective.
MojoD, DegefaT, FischerC. The Development of Agricultural Cooperatives in Ethiopia: History and a Framework for Future Trajectory. Ethiop J Soc Sci Humanit. 2018;13:49.
4.
MojoD, FischerC, DegefaT. Social and environmental impacts of agricultural cooperatives: Evidence from Ethiopia. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 2015;22:388–400.
5.
AdlerPS, KwonSW. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review. 2002;27:17–40.
6.
FreelMS. Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-Innovators?Small Bus Econ. 2000;14:195–210.
7.
NahapietJ, GhoshalS. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev. 1998;23:242–66.
8.
LankaS. Organisational social capital and social innovativeness of Australian social enterprises.
9.
MazzucchelliA, ChiericiR, TortoraD, et al. Innovation capability in geographically dispersed R&Dteams: The role of social capital and IT support. J Bus Res. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.034.
10.
MoranP. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strateg Manag J. 2005;26:1129–51.
11.
TsaiW, GhoshalS. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manag J. 1998;41:464–76.
12.
KimN, ShimC. Social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation of small- and medium-sized enterprises in a tourism cluster. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2018;30:2417–37.
13.
SubramaniamM, YoundtMA. The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal. 2005;48:450–63.
14.
ArregleJL, HittMA, SirmonDG, et al.The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. J Manag Stud. 2007;44:73–95.
15.
KwonSW, AdlerPS. Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Acad Manag Rev. 2014;39:412–22.
16.
ZenemyM. Human and Social Capital –Prerequisites for Sustained Prosperity. Human Systems Management. 1995;14:279–82.
17.
PukallTJ, CalabròA. The Internationalization of Family Firms. Fam Bus Rev. 2014;27:103–25.
18.
Sanchez-FamosoV, MasedaA, IturraldeT. The role of internal social capital in organisational innovation. An empirical study of family firms. Eur Manag J. 2014;32:950–62.
19.
PearsonAW, CarrJC, ShawJC. Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective. Entrep Theory Pract. 2008;32:949–69.
20.
SalvatoC, MelinL. Creating Value Across Generations in Family-Controlled Businesses: The Role of Family Social Capital. Fam Bus Rev. 2008;21:259–76.
21.
BreznikL, D. HisrichR. Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: are they related?J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2014;21:368–84.
22.
HakeliusK, HanssonH. Members” attitudes towards cooperatives and their perception of agency problems. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev. 2016;19:23–36.
23.
Sanchez-FamosoV, PittinoD, ChiricoF, et al. Social capital and innovation in family firms: The moderating roles of family control and generational involvement. Scand J Manag. Epub ahead of print September 1, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2019.02.002
24.
YasmeenH, WangY, ZameerH, et al.Service-innovation capability founded on knowledge from customers. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:29–41.
25.
ZellwegerTM, KellermannsFW, ChrismanJJ, et al.Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organ Sci. 2012;23:851–68.
CoeurderoyR, LwangoA. Social capital of family firms and organisational efficiency: theoretical proposals for a transmission model through bureaucratic costs. 2012.
28.
TasavoriM, ZaefarianR, EngTY. Internal social capital and international firm performance in emerging market family firms: The mediating role of participative governance. Int Small Bus J Res Entrep. 2018;36:887–910.
29.
WarnerM, EdwardsV, PolonskyG, et al.Management in transitional economies: From the Berlin wall to the great wall of China. RoutledgeCurzon, 2005. Epub ahead of print February 3, 2005. DOI: 10.4324/9780203398111
30.
Cuevas-RodríguezG, Cabello-MedinaC, Carmona-LavadoA. Internal and external social capital for radical product innovation: Do they always work well together?Br J Manag. 2014;25:266–84.
31.
MoranP. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strateg Manag J. 2005;26:1129–51.
32.
NahapietJ, GhoshalS. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev. 1998;23:242–66.
33.
LandryR, AmaraN, LamariM. Does social capital determine innovation?: To what extent? Technol Forecast Soc Changan Int J. 69.
34.
YenYF, TsengJF, WangHK. The effect of internal social capital on knowledge sharing. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 2015;13:214–24.
35.
HauYS, KimB, LeeH, et al.The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. Int J Inf Manage. 2013;33:356–66.
36.
MubarikMS, NaghaviN, MahmoodRT. Intellectual capital, competitive advantage and the ambidexterity liaison. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:267–77.
37.
AllahKohan N, SafariA, TeimouriH, et al.Friendship, transformational leadership and organizational climate. Human Systems Management. 2018;37:319–31.
TsaiW, GhoshalS. SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS. Acad Manag J. 1998;41:464–76.
40.
ZhengW. A Social Capital Perspective of Innovation from Individuals to Nations: Where is Empirical Literature Directing Us?Int J Manag Rev. 2008;12:151–83.
41.
Martinez-CanasR, Ruiz-PalominoP, Pozo-RubioR del. Crowdfunding And Social Networks In The Music Industry: Implications For Entrepreneurship. Int Bus Econ Res J. 2012;11:1471.
42.
FaccinK, GenariD, MackeJ. Interorganisational social capital and innovation: a multiple case study in wine producers networks in Serra Gaúcha. RAI Rev Adm e Inovação. 2017;14:52–66.
43.
NgD. The social dynamics of diverse and closed networks. IOS Press, 2004.
44.
QiaoLZHL;XW. Social Capital, Member Participation, and Cooperative Performance: Evidence from China’s Zhejiang. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev. 2015;18:30.
45.
DjikhyS, MoustaghfirK, AkhawaynA. International faculty, knowledge transfer, and innovation in higher education: A human resource development perspective. Human Systems Management. 2019;38:423–31.
46.
ShahNP, LevinDZ, CrossR. Secondhand social capital: Boundary spanning, secondhand closure, and individual performance. Soc Networks. 2018;52:18–27.
47.
BelderbosR, CarreeM, LokshinB. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res Policy. 2004;33:1477–92.
48.
RastogiPN. Knowledge management and intellectual capital –the new virtuous reality of competitiveness. Human Systems Management. 2000;19:39–48.
49.
FiciA. The Essential Role of Cooperative Law. Dovenschmidt Q. 2015;2:147–58.
50.
HuethB, MoschiniGC. Endogenous market structure and the cooperative firm. Econ Lett. 2014;124:283–5.
51.
IliopoulosC, VärnikR, FilippiM, et al. Organizational design in Estonian agricultural cooperatives. J Co-op Organ Manag. 7. Epub ahead of print December 1, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcom.2019.100093
52.
WarnerM, EdwardsV, PolonskyG, et al.Knowledge management and intellectual capital as a paradigm of value creation. Human Systems Management. 2005;21:1–204.
53.
Kroll, Henning. Spillovers and proximity in perspective: a network approach to improving the operationalisation of proximity. Work Pap “Firms Reg, https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fisifr/r22009.html (2009).
54.
Barraud-DidierV, HenningerM-C, AkremiA El. The Relationship Between Members’ Trust and Participation in the Governance of Cooperatives: The Role of Organizational Commitment. 2012.
55.
BagchiKK, GautamGP, RastraBank Nepal N. Cooperatives as a means of fostering Integrated and Sustainable Development A case study of Nepal Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: What Role for Social and Solidarity Economy? 2019.
56.
EddlestonKA, PowellGN. Nurturing Entrepreneurs’ Work-Family Balance: A Gendered Perspective. Entrep Theory Pract. 2012;36:513–41.
57.
HabibA, HuangX. Determining the optimal working capital to enhance firms’ profitability. Human Systems Management. 2016;35:279–89.
58.
Molina-MoralesFX, Martínez-FernándezMT. Does homogeneity exist within industrial districts? A social capital-based approach*. Pap Reg Sci. 2009;88:209–29.
59.
GuptaAK, SmithKG, ShalleyCE. The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION. Acad Manag J. 2006;49:693–706.
60.
AronoffCE, WardJL, AronoffCE, et al. The Role of Values in Uniting Family and Business. In: Family Business Values. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011, pp. 21-26.
61.
WhettenDA, FelinT, KingBG. The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions. J Manage. 2009;35:537–63.
62.
ZhengW. A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us?Int J Manag Rev. 2010;12:151–83.
63.
CapaldoA. Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strateg Manag J. 2007;28:585–608.
64.
MaurerI, EbersM. Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups. Adm Sci Q. 2006;51:262–92.
65.
Molina-MoralesFX, Martínez-FernándezMT. Social networks: Effects of social capital on firm innovation. J Small Bus Manag. 2010;48:258–79.
66.
WiseS. Can a team have too much cohesion?: the dark side to network density. Eur Manag J. 32.
67.
SharmaP, IrvingPG. Four Bases of Family Business Successor Commitment: Antecedents and Consequences. Entrep Theory Pract. 2005;29:13–33.
68.
WatsonWE, JohnsonL, MerrittD. Team Orientation, Self-Orientation, and Diversity in Task Groups: Their Connection to Team Performance over Time. Gr Organ Manag. 1998;23:161–88.
69.
DyerWG. Culture and Continuity in Family Firms. Fam Bus Rev. 1988;1:37–50.
70.
HallA, NordqvistM. Professional Management in Family Businesses: Toward an Extended Understanding. Fam Bus Rev. 2008;21:51–69.
71.
StewartA, HittMA. Why Can’t a Family Business Be More Like a Nonfamily Business?Fam Bus Rev. 2012;25:58–86.
72.
Gebre-EgziabherT, DemekeM. Micro Enterprises in Small Town, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Nature and Performance. Ethiop J Econ. 2008;14:79–111.
73.
OmerzelDG, JurdanabDS. The influence of intellectual capital on innovativeness and growth in tourism SMEs: Empirical evidence from Slovenia and Croatia. Econ Res Istraz. 2016;29:1075–90.
74.
RaoKVS, GebremichaelH. Social capital and innovation of firms: Evidence from the tenant firms in Ethiopia. 2017;3:1–7.
75.
Sanchez-FamosoV, PittinoD, ChiricoF, et al. Social capital and innovation in family firms: The moderating roles of family control and generational involvement. Scand J Manag. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2019.02.002.
76.
UrbachN, AhlemannF. Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares. 2010.
77.
AndersonJC, GerbingDW. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:411–23.
78.
MartinsLL, KellermannsFW. A Model of Business School Students’ Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2004;3:7–26.
79.
FornellC, LarckerDF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J Mark Res. 1981;18:382.
80.
FaccinK, GenariD, MackeJ. Interorganisational social capital and innovation: a multiple case study in wine producers networks in Serra Gaúcha. RAI Rev Adm e Inova ção. 2017;14:52–66.
81.
LoheFW, CalabròA. Please do not disturb! Differentiating board tasks in family and non-family firms during financial distress. Scand J Manag. 2017;33:36–49.
82.
RajapathiranaRPJ, HuiY. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. J Innov Knowl. 2018;3:44–55.
83.
ThompsonM. Social capital, innovation and economic growth. J Behav Exp Econ. 2018;73:46–52.
