Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-05-20
Measuring individual and work-related correlates of employees’ well-being with a short form of the psychological general well-being index: A pilot validation study in Slovenia
The improvement of psychic well-being and mental health prevention in the workplace are high on the European agenda.
OBJECTIVE:
The study aimed to perform a construct validation of the previously developed short forms of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) on the working population and to identify the possible individual and work-related characteristics that co-shape individual perceptions of well-being.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional, quantitative study design was utilized. A standardized instrument and its four short forms developed in previous studies were used. The sample included 376 employees from larger companies of one Slovenian region. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and multiple linear regression were performed.
RESULTS:
The short form that shows the best fit in this study sample is the PGWBI-B with RMSEA = 0.063; CFI = 0.986; SRMR = 0.026; NNFI = 0.977 and CI = 0.982. The significant independent variables were educational level (p < 0.001) and the average number of working hours per week (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The study proved that working conditions are correlated with employees’ well-being. Further validation of the PGWBI short forms should be performed with parallel and work context-specific measures of well-being to assess their concurrent validity. The monitoring of general employee well-being should become a regular practice in work organisations.
DupuyHJ. The Psychological generalWell-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J, editors. Assessment of quality of life clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. S.l.: Le Jacq Publishing; 1984. pp. 170-83.
2.
RevickiDA, LeldyNK, HowlandL. Evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Psychological General Well-Being Index with a new response scale. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(4):419–25.
3.
ten HaveM, van DorsselaerS, de GraafR. The association between type and number of adverse working conditions and mental health during a time of economic crisis (2010-2012). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(6):899–907.
4.
KankarašM, van HoutenG. Third European Company Survey –overview report: Workplace practices –patterns, performance and well-being. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound); 2015.
5.
MemishK, MartinA, BartlettL, DawkinsS, SandersonK. Workplace mental health: An international review of guidelines. Prev Med. 2017;101:213–22.
6.
Eurofound—European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, EU-OSHA — European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Psychosocial risks in Europe: Prevalence and strategies for prevention: A joint report from the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living andWorking Conditions and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2014.
7.
European Commission, Eurostat. Labour force survey in the EU, candidate and EFTA countries: Main characteristics of national surveys. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.
8.
LekaS, JainA, IavicoliS, Di TeccoC. An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: Achievements, challenges, and the future. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–18.
9.
LincolnKD, TaylorRJ, ChaeDH, ChattersLM. Demographic correlates of psychological well-being and distress among older African Americans and Caribbean black adults. Best Pract Ment Health. 2010;6(1):103–26.
10.
WilkinsonM. Work life balance and psychological wellbeing in men and women. Auburn: Auburn University; 2013.
11.
CookePJ, MelchertTP, ConnorK. Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. Couns Psychol. 2016;44:730–57.
BabnikK, BenkoE, von HumboldtS. Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale. In: Gu D, Dupre ME, editors. Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer; 2019.
14.
DienerE, HeintzelmanSJ, KushlevK, TayL, WirtzD, LutesLD, et al.Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well being. Canadian Psychology. 2017;58:87–104.
15.
RyffCD. Beautiful ideas and the scientific enterprise: Sources of intellectual vitality in research on eudaimonic well-being. In: Vittersø J, editor. Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 95-108.
16.
TanevaS. What is psychological well-being and how it changes throughout the employment cycle? In: Monteiro I, Iguti AM, editors. Trabalho, saúde e sustentabilidade: Construindo a cidadania=Work, health and sustainability: Building citizenship. Campinas: UnicampBFCM; 2016. pp. 83-90.
17.
RyffCD. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;83(1):10–28.
18.
BartelsM. Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behav Genet. 2015;45(2):137–156.
19.
RyffCD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069–81.
20.
ChassanyO, DimenäsE, DuboisD, WuA. The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) User Manual. Lyon: MAPI Research Institute; 2004.
21.
BianchiG, MarchesiniG, NicolinoF, GrazianiR, SgarbiD, LoguercioC, et al.Psychological status and depression in patients with liver cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37(8):593–600.
22.
DavisonSL, BellRJ, LaChinaM, HoldenSL, DavisSR. The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. J Sex Med. 2009;6(10):2690–7.
23.
GrossiE, GrothN, MosconiP, CeruttiR, PaceF, CompareA, et al.Development and validation of the short version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB-S). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:88.
24.
WoolC, CeruttiR, MarquisP, HerviéC, CialdellaP. Psychometric validation of two Italian quality of life questionnaires in menopausal women. Maturitas. 2000;35(2):129–142.
25.
GartoullaP, BellRJ, WorsleyR, DavisSR. Moderate-severely bothersome vasomotor symptoms are associated with lowered psychological general wellbeing in women at midlife. Maturitas. 2015;81(4):487–92.
26.
LancianoT, CurciA. Does emotions communication ability affect psychological well-being? A study with the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) v2.0. Health Commun. 2015;30(11):1112–21.
27.
MacriE, LimoniC. Artistic activities and psychological well-being perceived by patients with spinal cord injury. Arts Psychother. 2017;54:1–6.
28.
GastonJE, VoglLE. Psychometric properties of the General Well-Being Index. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(1):71–5.
29.
Pereira M daC, AntunesM, BarrosoI, CorreiaT, BritoI, MonteiroMJ. Adaptation and validation of the psychological General Well-Being Index: Confirmatory factor analysis of the short version. J Nurs Referência Rev Enferm Referência. 2018;4:9–11.
30.
MatthewsRA, KathLM, Barnes-FarrellJL. A short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: Item selection and scale validation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010;15(1):75–90.
31.
NarushimaM, LiuJ, DiestelkampN. Lifelong learning in active ageing discourse: Its conserving effect on wellbeing, health and vulnerability. Ageing Soc. 2018;38(4):651–75.
32.
Lundgren-NilssonÅ, JonsdottirIH, AhlborgG, TennantA. Construct validity of the psychological general well-being index (PGWBI) in a sample of patients undergoing treatment for stress-related exhaustion: A rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:2.
33.
TestaS, CivilottiC, Di FiniG, VegliaF, RossettoC, BoncinelliV. Development of two equivalent short forms of the Psychological General Well-Being Index: PGWBI-A and PGWBI-B. Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2016;23:149–66.
34.
MarchandA, JusterR-P, DurandP, LupienSJ. Work stress models and diurnal cortisol variations: The SALVEO study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21:182–93.
35.
MarkGM, SmithAP. Stress models: A review and suggested new direction. In: Houdmont J, Leka S, editors. Occupational Health Psychology, European Perspectives On Research, Education and Practice. Vol. 3. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2008. pp. 111-44.
De JongeJ, DormannC. Whyismyjob so stressful? Characteristics, processes and models of stress at work. In: Chmiel N, Fraccaroli F, Sverke S, editors. An introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective, 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
38.
CifreE, VeraM, SignaniF. Women and men at work: Analyzing occupational stress and well-being from a gender perspective. Rev Puertorriqueña Psicol. 2015;26:172–91.
39.
BoštjančičE, SlanaZ. Psychophysical workload of workers in Slovenia. In: Petelin A, Šarabon N, Prosen M, Žvanut, editors. Health of the working age population: Proceedings 2017. Koper: University of Primorska Press; 2017. pp. 9-22.
40.
LunauT, SiegristJ, DraganoN, WahrendorfM. The association between education and work stress: Does the policy context matter?PLoS One. 2015;10(3):1–17.
41.
GrossiE, CompareA. Psychological general well-being index (PGWB). In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014, pp. 5152-6.
42.
JöreskogKG, OlssonUH, WallentinFY. Multivariate Analysis with LISREL. Basel: Springer; 2016.
43.
SunJ. Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2005;37:240–56.
44.
JaccardJames, WanCK. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
45.
HooperD, CoughlanJ, MullenM. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
SirgyMJ, LeeD. Work-Life Balance: A Quality-of-Life Model. Appl Res Qual Life. 2016;11(4):1059–82.
48.
MaslachC, LeiterMP. Burnout. In: Fink G, editor. Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion and behaviour. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2016. pp. 351-7.
49.
SalvagioniDAJ, MelandaFN, MesasAE, GonzálezAD, GabaniFL, AndradeSM de. Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies. PloS One. 2017;12:e0185781.
50.
SupriyantoS. Compensation effects on job satisfaction and performance. Hum Syst Manag. 2018;37(3):281–5.
51.
BoštjančičE, PetrovčičA. Exploring the relationship between job satisfaction, work engagement and career satisfaction: The study from public university. Hum Syst Manag. 2019;38(4):411–22.
52.
Chung-YanGA. The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010;15(3):237–51.
53.
BakaŁ. Does job burnout mediate negative effects of job demands on mental and physical health in a group of teachers? Testing the energetic process of Job Demands-Resources model. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(2):335–46.
54.
LevantRF, HallRJ, WeigoldIK, McCurdyER. Construct distinctiveness and variance composition of multi-dimensional instruments: Three short-form masculinity measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2015;62(3):488–502.
