BACKGROUND: The use of relaxation contrast, as measured by MRI, is particularly commonplace in non-invasive assessment of the brain. However, the mechanisms and uses of relaxation in the brain are still not fully understood. The hypothesis that relaxation may show anisotropy in the human brain was studied at 3 T. anisotropy refers to the variation of in ordered structures with respect to the direction of the applied magnetic field.
METHODS: Using a 3 T clinical MRI scanner, we made quantitative multi-contrast spin-echo and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measurements in healthy volunteers, repeating the measurements with the subject’s head oriented differently relative to the applied field, for the measurement of possible spin-echo anisotropy.
RESULTS: We report relaxation anisotropy measurements and present a means for visualising it according to the principal orientation of ordered structures in the brain parenchyma. We introduce a parameter for the model-free description of anisotropy, namely the “fractional anisotropy”, similar to that used to describe anisotropy of translational diffusion. This parameterisation enables the overall level of anisotropy in across a chosen region or tissue to be calculated. Anisotropic relaxation was observed in both gray and white matter, though to a greater extent in the latter, with a strong relationship with the anisotropy of translational diffusion. This is evidenced by making repeat measurements with the subject’s head tilted to different angles relative to the applied magnetic field, by which means we observed the at the same anatomical site to change.
CONCLUSIONS: Relaxation anisotropy has a significant effect on in the brain parenchyma. It has the potential to offer non-invasive access to tissue microstructure not available by other imaging modalities, and may be sensitive to pathology or noxious factors not detected by other means.
Alonso-OrtizE.LevesqueI.R. and PikeG.B., MRI-based myelin water imaging: A technical review, Magn. Reson. Med.73 (2015), 70–81.
3.
BarbierE.L.MarrettS.DanekA.VortmeyerA.Van GelderenP.DuynJ.BandettiniP.GrafmanJ. and KoretskyA.P., Imaging cortical anatomy by high-resolution MR at 3.0 T: Detection of the stripe of Gennari in visual area 17, Magn. Reson. Med.48 (2002), 735–738.
4.
BasserP.J. and JonesD.K., Diffusion-tensor MRI: Theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review, NMR Biomed.15 (2002), 456–467.
5.
BasserP.J.MattielloJ. and LebihanD., MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging, Biophys. J.66 (1994), 259–267.
6.
BenderB. and KloseU., The in vivo influence of white matter fiber orientation towards B(0) on T2∗ in the human brain, NMR Biomed.23 (2010), 1071–1076.
7.
BerendsenH.J.C., Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration, J. Chem. Phys.36 (1962), 3297–3310.
8.
CherubiniA.PeranP.HagbergG.E.VarsiA.E.LuccichentiG.CaltagironeC.SabatiniU. and SpallettaG., Characterization of white matter fiber bundles with T2∗ relaxometry and diffusion tensor imaging, Magn. Reson. Med.61 (2009), 1066–1072.
9.
DeoniS.C., Quantitative relaxometry of the brain, Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging21 (2010), 101–113.
10.
DuJ.PakB.C.ZnamirowskiR.StatumS.TakahashiA.ChungC.B. and BydderG.M., Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis, Magn. Reson. Imaging27 (2009), 557–564.
11.
EricksonS.J.CoxI.H.HydeJ.S.CarreraG.F.StrandtJ.A. and EstkowskiL.D., Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity – a manifestation of the magic angle phenomenon, Radiology181 (1991), 389–392.
12.
EricksonS.J.ProstR.W. and TiminsM.E., The “magic angle” effect: Background physics and clinical relevance, Radiology188 (1993), 23–25.
13.
FeinbergD.A.MoellerS.SmithS.M.AuerbachE.RamannaS.GuntherM.GlasserM.F.MillerK.L.UgurbilK. and YacoubE., Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging, PLoS One5 (2010), e15710.
14.
FullertonG.D.CameronI.L. and OrdV.A., Orientation of tendons in the magnetic-field and its effect on T2 relaxation-times, Radiology155 (1985), 433–435.
15.
FullertonG.D. and RahalA., Collagen structure: The molecular source of the tendon magic angle effect, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging25 (2007), 345–361.
16.
HenkelmanR.M.StaniszG.J.KimJ.K. and BronskillM.J., Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues, Magn. Reson. Med.32 (1994), 592–601.
17.
JenkinsonM.BannisterP.BradyM. and SmithS., Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images, NeuroImage17 (2002), 825–841.
18.
JenkinsonM.BeckmannC.F.BehrensT.E.WoolrichM.W. and SmithS.M., FSL, NeuroImage62 (2012), 782–790.
19.
JenkinsonM. and SmithS., A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images, Med. Image Anal.5 (2001), 143–156.
20.
JudgeP.J.TaylorG.F.DannattH.R. and WattsA., Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for membrane protein structure determination, Methods Mol. Biol.1261 (2015), 331–347.
21.
KolindS.MatthewsL.Johansen-BergH.LeiteM.I.WilliamsS.C.DeoniS. and PalaceJ., Myelin water imaging reflects clinical variability in multiple sclerosis, NeuroImage60 (2012), 263–270.
22.
KrasnosselskaiaL.V.FullertonG.D.DoddS.J. and CameronI.L., Water in tendon: Orientational analysis of the free induction decay, Magn. Reson. Med.54 (2005), 280–288.
LiW.WuB.AvramA.V. and LiuC.L., Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings, NeuroImage59 (2012), 2088–2097.
25.
LiX.VikramD.S.LimI.A.JonesC.K.FarrellJ.A. and Van ZijlP.C., Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7 T, NeuroImage62 (2012), 314–330.
26.
LiuC.LiW.JohnsonG.A. and WuB., High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility, NeuroImage56 (2011), 930–938.
27.
LiuC.LiW.WuB.JiangY. and JohnsonG.A., 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging, NeuroImage59 (2012), 1290–1298.
MackayA.WhittallK.AdlerJ.LiD.PatyD. and GraebD., In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance, Magn. Reson. Med.31 (1994), 673–677.
30.
MädlerB.DrabyczS.A.KolindS.H.WhittallK.P. and MackayA.L., Is diffusion anisotropy an accurate monitor of myelination? Correlation of multicomponent T2 relaxation and diffusion tensor anisotropy in human brain, Magn. Reson. Imaging26 (2008), 874–888.
31.
MitsumoriF.WatanabeH.TakayaN. and GarwoodM., Apparent transverse relaxation rate in human brain varies linearly with tissue iron concentration at 4.7 T, Magn. Reson. Med.58 (2007), 1054–1060.
32.
MoriS.CrainB.J.ChackoV.P. and Van ZijlP.C., Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging, Ann. Neurol.45 (1999), 265–269.
33.
MoriS. and ZhangJ., Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), in: Encyclopedia of NeuroscienceSquireL.R., ed., Academic Press, Oxford, 2009, pp. 531–538.
34.
MosherT.J.LiuY. and TorokC.M., Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: Evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running, Osteoarthritis Cartilage18 (2010), 358–364.
35.
NairG.TanahashiY.LowH.P.Billings-GagliardiS.SchwartzW.J. and DuongT.Q., Myelination and long diffusion times alter diffusion-tensor-imaging contrast in myelin-deficient shiverer mice, NeuroImage28 (2005), 165–174.
36.
NicholasM.P.EryilmazE.FerrageF.CowburnD. and GhoseR., Nuclear spin relaxation in isotropic and anisotropic media, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc.57 (2010), 111–158.
37.
OhS.H.KimY.B.ChoZ.H. and LeeJ., Origin of B-0 orientation dependent R2∗ (=1/T2∗) in white matter, NeuroImage73 (2013), 71–79.
38.
PetoS. and GillisP., Fiber-to-field angle dependence of proton nuclear magnetic-relaxation in collagen, Magn. Reson. Imaging8 (1990), 705–712.
39.
RudkoD.A.KlassenL.M.De ChickeraS.N.GatiJ.S.DekabanG.A. and MenonR.S., Origins of R2∗ orientation dependence in gray and white matter, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111 (2014), E159–E167.
40.
SatiP.SilvaA.C.Van GelderenP.GaitanM.I.WohlerJ.E.JacobsonS.DuynJ.H. and ReichD.S., In vivo quantification of T2∗ anisotropy in white matter fibers in marmoset monkeys, NeuroImage59 (2012), 979–985.
41.
TadimallaS. and MomotK.I., Effect of partial H2O-D2O replacement on the anisotropy of transverse proton spin relaxation in bovine articular cartilage, PLoS One9 (2014), e115288.
42.
ToftsP., Quantitative MRI of the Brain: Measuring Changes Caused by Disease, Wiley, 2004.
43.
WhartonS. and BowtellR., Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109 (2012), 18559–18564.
44.
WhittallK.P.MackayA.L.GraebD.A.NugentR.A.LiD.K. and PatyD.W., In vivo measurement of T2 distributions and water contents in normal human brain, Magn. Reson. Med.37 (1997), 34–43.
45.
WigginsC.J.GudmundsdottirV.Le BihanD.LebonV. and ChaumeilM., Orientation dependence of white matter T2∗ contrast at 7 T: A direct demonstration, in: Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., Vol. 16, 2008, p. 237.
46.
WilhelmM.J.OngH.H.WehrliS.L.LiC.TsaiP.-H.HackneyD.B. and WehrliF.W., Direct magnetic resonance detection of myelin and prospects for quantitative imaging of myelin density, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109 (2012), 9605–9610.
47.
ZhangY.BradyM. and SmithS., Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation–maximization algorithm, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging20 (2001), 45–57.
48.
ZhouJ.GolayX.Van ZijlP.C.SilvennoinenM.J.KauppinenR.PekarJ. and KrautM., Inverse T2 contrast at 1.5 Tesla between gray matter and white matter in the occipital lobe of normal adult human brain, Magn. Reson. Med.46 (2001), 401–406.