Biomechanical effects of USS fixation with different screw insertion depths on the vertebrae stiffness and screw stress for the treatment of the L1 fracture
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2018
Biomechanical effects of USS fixation with different screw insertion depths on the vertebrae stiffness and screw stress for the treatment of the L1 fracture
To evaluate the biomechanical effects of internal fixation with different screw insertion depths on vertebrae stiffness and screw stress for L1 fracture.
METHODS:
The established L1 fracture was fixed with 10 different depths of screw insertion: 10–100% screw-path length (SPL). Loading on the T12 endplate was simulated.
RESULTS:
Screws inserted to 60–100% depths has a higher axial displacement of screw against injured vertebrae and maximum stress of screws compared to those of screws inserted to 30–50% depths and 10–20% ( 0.05). No significant difference was noted among 60–100% SPL groups. Under single loading condition, the incidence rate of maximum stress of each screw ranged from 16.7–50.0%. Chi-square test showed superior screw has a higher incidence rate of maximum stress than inferior screw ( 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
Screws inserted to 60% depth or more can achieve effective strength to withstand the postoperative height correction loss of the L1 vertebrae fracture. However, continuous prolonged depth of screw insertion did not significantly increase the effective strength of the screw against injured vertebrae and maximum equivalent stress of screws. The incidence rate of the maximum stress of each screw in correlated with position of screw insertion but not associated with the screw insertion depth.
DaiLYJiangSDWangXYJiangLS. A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol.2007; 67(3): 221-31; discussion 31.
2.
ParkWMParkYSKimKKimYH. Biomechanical comparison of instrumentation techniques in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Sci.2009; 14(4): 443-9.
3.
XuGJLiZJMaJXZhangTFuXMaXL. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J.2013; 22(10): 2176-83.
4.
DaiLYJiangLSJiangSD. Conservative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a long-term follow-up results with special reference to the load sharing classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(23): 2536-44.
5.
PostRBvan der SluisCKLeferinkVJten DuisHJ. Long-term functional outcome after type A3 spinal fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Belg.2009; 75(3): 389-95.
6.
ThomasKCBaileyCSDvorakMFKwonBFisherC. Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine.2006; 4(5): 351-8.
7.
AkbarniaBACrandallDGBurkusKMatthewsT. Use of long rods and a short arthrodesis for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1994; 76(11): 1629-35.
8.
CotrelYDuboussetJGuillaumatM. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1988; 227: 10-23.
9.
KannaRMShettyAPRajasekaranS. Posterior fixation including the fractured vertebra for severe unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Spine J.2015; 15(2): 256-64.
10.
McLainRF. The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(11 Suppl): S70-9; discussion S104.
11.
AltayMOzkurtBAktekinCNOzturkAMDoganOTabakAY. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures with short- or long-segment posterior fixation in magerl type a fractures. Eur Spine J.2007; 16(8): 1145-55.
12.
TezerenGKuruI. Posterior fixation of thoracolumbar burst fracture: short-segment pedicle fixation versus long-segment instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech.2005; 18(6): 485-8.
13.
AlanayAAcarogluEYaziciMOznurASuratA. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure? Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001; 26(2): 213-7.
14.
ShenWJLiuTJShenYS. Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2001; 26(9): 1038-45.
15.
MatsukawaKTaguchiEYatoYImabayashiHHosoganeNAsazumaT, et al. Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015; 40(15): E873-8.
16.
KragMHBeynnonBDPopeMHDeCosterTA. Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. J Spinal Disord.1988; 1(4): 287-94.
17.
ZindrickMRWiltseLLWidellEHThomasJCHollandWRFieldBT, et al. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1986; (203): 99-112.
18.
KaramiKJBuckenmeyerLEKiapourAMKelkarPSGoelVKDemetropoulosCK, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout. J Spinal Disord Tech.2015; 28(3): E133-9.
19.
HailongYWeiLZhenshengMHongxunS. Computer analysis of the safety of using three different pedicular screw insertion points in the lumbar spine in the Chinese population. Eur Spine J.2007; 16(5): 619-23.
20.
HeBYanLGuoHLiuTWangXHaoD. The difference in superior adjacent segment pathology after lumbar posterolateral fusion by using 2 different pedicle screw insertion techniques in 9-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2014; 39(14): 1093-8.
21.
LiCZhouYWangHLiuJXiangL. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures through short segment pedicle screw fixation techniques using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis. PLoS One.2014; 9(6): e99156.
22.
DaiL. Mechanism of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a biomechanical study. Chin Med J (Engl).2002; 115(3): 336-8.
23.
MarkolfKL. Deformation of the thoracolumbar intervertebral joints in response to external loads: a biomechanical study using autopsy material. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1972; 54(3): 511-33.
24.
MarkolfKLMorrisJM. The structural components of the intervertebral disc. A study of their contributions to the ability of the disc to withstand compressive forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1974; 56(4): 675-87.
25.
BrownTHansenRJYorraAJ. Some mechanical tests on the lumbosacral spine with particular reference to the intervertebral discs; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1957; 39-A(5): 1135-64.
26.
van der RoerNde LangeESBakkerFCde VetHCvan TulderMW. Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J.2005; 14(6): 527-34.
27.
KanedaKTaneichiHAbumiKHashimotoTSatohSFujiyaM. Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1997; 79(1): 69-83.
28.
SjostromLKarlstromGPechPRauschningW. Indirect spinal canal decompression in burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1996; 21(1): 113-23.
29.
ParkerJWLaneJRKaraikovicEEGainesRW. Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2000; 25(9): 1157-70.
30.
RohlmannAZanderTRaoMBergmannG. Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing. J Biomech.2009; 42(10): 1520-6.
31.
RohlmannAZanderTRaoMBergmannG. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. J Biomech.2009; 42(7): 884-90.
32.
XuGFuXDuCMaJLiZMaX. Biomechanical effects of vertebroplasty on thoracolumbar burst fracture with transpedicular fixation: a finite element model analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2014; 100(4): 379-83.
33.
Shirazi-AdlA. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine in sagittal/lateral moments. Spine.1994; 19(21): 2407-14.
34.
NaserkhakiSEl-RichM. Sensitivity of lumbar spine response to follower load and flexion moment: finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin.2017; 20(5): 550-7.
35.
VaccaroARSchroederGDKeplerCKCumhur OnerFVialleLRKandzioraF, et al. The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J.2016; 25(4): 1087-94.
36.
BuckenmeyerLE. Optimization of pedicle screw depth in the lumbar spine: biomechanical characterization of screw stability and pullout strength, 2013.
37.
VaccaroAROnerCKeplerCKDvorakMSchnakeKBellabarbaC, et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2013; 38(23): 2028-37.
