Aortic Lumen Area Is Increased in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Correlates to Biomechanical Rupture Risk

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate how 2-dimensional geometric parameters differ between ruptured and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and provide a biomechanical explanation for the findings. Methods: The computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of 30 patients (mean age 77±10 years; 23 men) with ruptured AAAs and 60 patients (mean age 76±8 years; 46 men) with asymptomatic AAAs were used to measure maximum sac diameter along the center lumen line, the cross-sectional lumen area, the total vessel area, the intraluminal thrombus (ILT) area, and corresponding volumes. The CTA data were segmented to create 3-dimensional patient-specific models for finite element analysis to compute peak wall stress (PWS) and the peak wall rupture index (PWRI). To reduce confounding from the maximum diameter, 2 diameter-matched groups were selected from the initial patient cohorts: 28 ruptured AAAs and another with 15 intact AAAs (diameters 74±12 vs 73±11, p=0.67). A multivariate model including the maximum diameter, the lumen area, and the ILT area of the 60 intact aneurysms was employed to predict biomechanical rupture risk parameters. Results: In the diameter-matched subgroup comparison, ruptured AAAs had a significantly larger cross-sectional lumen area (1954±1254 vs 1120±623 mm², p=0.023) and lower ILT area ratio (55±24 vs 68±24, p=0.037). The ILT area (2836±1462 vs 2385±1364 mm², p=0.282) and the total vessel area (3956±1170 vs 4338±1388 mm², p=0.384) did not differ statistically between ruptured and intact aneurysms. The PWRI was increased in ruptured AAAs (0.80 vs 0.48, p<0.001), but the PWS was similar (249 vs 284 kPa, p=0.194). In multivariate regression analysis, lumen area was significantly positively associated with both PWS (p<0.001) and PWRI (p<0.01). The ILT area was also significantly positively associated with PWS (p<0.001) but only weakly with PWRI (p<0.01). The lumen area conferred a higher risk increase in both PWS and PWRI when compared with the ILT area. Conclusion: The lumen area is increased in ruptured AAAs compared to diameter-matched asymptomatic AAAs. Furthermore, this finding may in part be explained by a relationship with biomechanical rupture risk parameters, in which lumen area, irrespective of maximum diameter, increases PWS and PWRI. These observations thus suggest a possible method to improve prediction of rupture risk in AAAs by measuring the lumen area without the use of computational modeling.

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm aneurysm diameter biomechanics computed tomography angiography finite element analysis intraluminal thrombus lumen area rupture risk,ruptured aneurysm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet. 1998;352:1649–1655.

Lederle

Wilson

Johnson

et al . Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1437–1444.

Skibba

Evans

Hopkins

et al . Reconsidering gender relative to risk of rupture in the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1429–1436.

Powell

Brown

Forbes

et al . Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007;94:702–708.

Darling

Messina

Brewster

et al . Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation. 1977;56:II161–II164.

Laine

Vänttinen

Kantonen

et al . Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients under screening age and elective repair threshold. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:511–516.

Brady

Thompson

Fowkes

FGR

et al .; UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110:16–21.

Lindquist Liljeqvist

Hultgren

Gasser

et al . Volume growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms correlates with baseline volume and increasing finite element analysis-derived rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:1434–1442.e3.

Erhart

Roy

de Vries

JPP

et al . Prediction of rupture sites in abdominal aortic aneurysms after finite element analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:115–120.

10.

Khosla

Morris

Moxon

et al . Meta-analysis of peak wall stress in ruptured, symptomatic and intact abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1350–1357.

11.

Nicholls

Gardner

Meissner

et al . Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:884–888.

12.

Joldes

Miller

Wittek

et al . BioPARR: A software system for estimating the rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4641.

13.

Stenbaek

Kalin

Swedenborg

Growth of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20:466–469.

14.

Wolf

Thomas

Brennan

et al . Computed tomography scanning findings associated with rapid expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:529–535.

15.

Speelman

Schurink

GWH

Bosboom

EMH

et al . The mechanical role of thrombus on the growth rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:19–26.

16.

Behr-Rasmussen

Grøndal

Bramsen

et al . Mural thrombus and the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a large population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:301–307.

17.

Auer

Gasser

TC.

Reconstruction and finite element mesh generation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from computerized tomography angiography data with minimal user interactions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:1022–1028.

18.

Gasser

Auer

Labruto

et al . Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:176–185.

19.

Gasser

Nchimi

Swedenborg

et al . A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk: method and retrospective validation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47:288–295.

20.

Gasser

Görgülü

Folkesson

et al . Failure properties of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm under static and pulsating mechanical loads. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:179–188.

21.

Vande Geest

Wang

DHJ

Wisniewski

et al . Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:1098–1106.

22.

Imai

King

et al . MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42:1–28.

23.

Golledge

Iyer

Jenkins

et al . Thrombus volume is similar in patients with ruptured and intact abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:315–320.

24.

Stenbaek

Kalin

Swedenborg

Growth of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;20:466–469.

25.

Z-Y

Sadat

U-King-Im

et al . Association between aneurysm shoulder stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: a longitudinal follow-up study. Circulation. 2010;122:1815–1822.

26.

Shang

Nathan

Woo

et al . Local wall thickness in finite element models improves prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:217–223.

27.

Martufi

Lindquist Liljeqvist

Sakalihasan

et al . Local diameter, wall stress, and thrombus thickness influence the local growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:957–966.

28.

Schurink

GWH

van Baalen

Visser

MJT

et al . Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:501–506.

29.

Wang

DHJ

Makaroun

Webster

et al . Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:598–604.

30.

Thubrikar

Robicsek

Labrosse

et al . Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2003;44:67–77.

31.

O’Leary

Kavanagh

Grace

et al . The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties. J Biomech. 2014;47:1430–1437.

32.

Kok

Nguyen

Speelman

et al . Feasibility of wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1175–1184.

33.

Manning

Kristmundsson

Sonesson

et al . Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:263–268.

34.

Teutelink

Cancrinus

van de Heuvel

et al . Preliminary intraobserver and interobserver variability in wall stress and rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using a semiautomatic finite element model. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:326–330.

35.

Labruto

Lundberg

Roy

CT angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms: not everything that is not white is thrombus. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1387–1388.

36.

Roy

Labruto

Beckman

et al . Bleeding into the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with rupture. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1108–1113.

37.

Polzer

Gasser

Swedenborg

et al . The impact of intraluminal thrombus failure on the mechanical stress in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:467–473.

38.

Talvitie

Lindquist Liljeqvist

Siika

et al . Localized hyperattenuations in the intraluminal thrombus may predict rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29:144–145.