Mechanomyography (MMG) has been used to investigate mechanical characteristics of muscle contraction in clinical and experimental settings.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude (MMG) measurements as a tool for measuring the maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) of trunk muscles in healthy participants.
METHODS:
There were ten young adults participating in this study. Accelerometers were used to detect surface MMG signals from three trials of 5-s MVICs of the rectus abdominis, external obliques, erector spinae, and multifidus in the vertical, transverse, and longitudinal directions. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change were calculated.
RESULTS:
Good to excellent test-retest reliability of mechanomyographic amplitude (MMG) measurements was achieved for all MVICs of trunk muscles in healthy participants, as indicated by ICCs ranging from 0.99 to 0.64 for MMG of the trunk muscles during MVIC.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study demonstrates that MMG is a reliable measurement to detect the activation amplitudes of trunk muscles during MVIC.
BabaultNDesbrossesKFabreMSMichautAPoussonM. Neuromuscular fatigue development during maximal concentric and isometric knee extensions. J Appl Physiol. 2006; 100: 780-5. Doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00737.2005.
4.
BarryDTLeonardJAGitterAJBallRD. Acoustic myography as a control signal for an externally powered prosthesis. Arch Physic Med Rehab. 1986; 67: 267-9.
5.
AkatakiKMitaKItohK, et al. Acoustic and electrical activities during voluntary isometric contraction of biceps brachii muscles in patients with spastic cerebral palsy. Muscle Nerve. 1996; 19: 1252-57. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199610)19:10.
6.
TarataMT. Mechanomyography versus EMG in monitoring the muscular fatigue. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2003; 2: 3. Doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-2-3.
OrizioCGobboMDiemontBEspositoFVeicsteinasA. The surface mechanomyogram as a tool to describe the influence of fatigue on biceps brachii motor unit activation strategy. Historical basis and novel evidence. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 90: 326-336.
9.
OrizioCBarattaRVZhouBHSolomonowMVeicsteinasA. Force and surface mechanomyogram frequency responses in cat gastrocnemius. J Biomech. 2000; 33: 427-33. Doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00185-2.
10.
IslamMASundarajKAhmadRBSundarajSAhamedNU, et al. Longitudinal, Lateral and Transverse Axes of Forearm Muscles Influence the Crosstalk in the Mechanomyographic Signals during Isometric Wrist Postures. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e104280. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104280.
11.
DobrunzLEPelletierDGMcMahonTA. Muscle stiffness measured under conditions simulating natural sound production. Biophys J. 1990; 58: 557-565.
12.
FrangioniJVKwan-GettTSDobrunzLEMcMahonTA. The mechanism of low-frequency sound production in muscle. Biophys J. 1987; 51: 775-783.
13.
BarryD. Vibrations and sounds from evoked muscle twitches. Electromyograph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992; 32: 35-40.
14.
CesconCMadeleinePFarinaD. Longitudinal and transverse propagation of surface mechanomyographic waves generated by single motor unit activity. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 2008; 46: 871-877.
15.
CesconCSguazziEMerlettiRFarinaD. Non-invasive characterization of single motor unit electromyographic and mechanomyographic activities in the biceps brachii muscle. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2006; 16: 17-24.
16.
ArcherAAAtangchoPSabraKGShinoharaM. Propagation direction of natural mechanical oscillations in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contraction. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2012; 22: 51-59.
17.
FallerLNetoGNNButtonVLSNNohamaP. Muscle fatigue assessment by mechanomyography during application of NMES protocol. Rev Brasil Fisioterapia/Braz. J Phys Ther. 2009; 13: 422-429.
18.
LachinJM. The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2004; 1(6): 553-66.
19.
RankinGStokesM. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: An illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998; 12(3): 187-99. Doi:10.1191/026921598672178340.
20.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-10. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
21.
GoldsmithCHBoersMBombardierCTugwellP. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: Development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol. 1993; 20: 561-5. Doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141430.
22.
AkatakiKMitaKItohK. Repeatability study of mechanomyography in submaximal isometric contractions using coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 39: 161-6.
23.
BeckTWDeFreitasJMStockMS. The linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus submaximal isometric force relationship. Physiol Meas. 2009; 30: 1009-16. Doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/10/002
24.
StockMSBeckTWDeFreitasJMDillonMA. Linearity and reliability of the mechanomyographic amplitude versus dynamic torque relationships for the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles. Muscle Nerve. 2010; 41: 342-9. DOI: 10.1002/mus.21491.
25.
MadeleinePCesconCFarinaD. Spatial and force dependency of mechanomyographic signal features. J Neurosci Methods. 2006; 158: 89-99. Doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.018.
26.
CesconCFarinaDGobboMMerlettiROrizioC. Effect of accelerometer location on mechanomyogram variables during voluntary, constant-force contractions in three human muscles. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2004; 42: 121-7. Doi: 10.1007/BF02351021.
27.
CesconCMadeleinePGraven-NielsenTMerlettiRFarinaD. Two-dimensional spatial distribution of surface mechanomyographical response to single motor unit activity. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 159: 19-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06.011.
28.
FarinaDLiXMadeleineP. Motor unit acceleration maps and interference mechanomyographic distribution. J Biomech. 2008; 41: 2843-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.007.
29.
MadeleinePFarinaD. Time to task failure in shoulder elevation is associated to increase in amplitude and to spatial heterogeneity of upper trapezius mechanomyographic signals. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 102: 325-33. Doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0589-2.
30.
IslamMASundarajKAhmadRBSundarajSAhamedNUAliMA. Cross-Talk in Mechanomyographic Signals from the Forearm Muscles during Sub-Maximal to Maximal Isometric Grip Force. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(5): e96628. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096628.
31.
FarinaDLiXMadeleineP. Motor unit acceleration maps and interference mechanomyographic distribution. J Biomech. 2008; 41: 2843-2849.
