The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of double-application coats and times on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and adhesive-dentin interfaces created by dentin adhesive systems after 6 months of storage in water.
Materials and methods:
Two-hundred sixteen extracted non-carious human third molars were selected for the study. Single-Bond Universal (SU) and All-Bond Universal (AU), Adper Easy One (Eo) Self-Etch adhesive and Adper Single-Bond 2 (Sb) etch-and-rinse adhesive were applied to a flat dentin surface using three methods (1): dentin adhesives were applied as recommended by the manufacturers; (2): two consecutive coats of dentin adhesives were applied before photo-polymerization; and (3): a single coat of adhesive was applied but with twice the manufacturers recommended application time. Microtensile bond strength was determined either immediately or after 6 months of water storage. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc tests.
Results:
At 24 h, groups 1, 2, and 3 exhibited statistically similar results for all dentin adhesive systems. For AU-Er, group 3 showed significantly higher bond strength than all group of AU-Se after 6 months.
Conclusion:
Universal adhesives seemed more stable against water degradation than traditional two-step etch-and-rinse and all-in-one systems within the 6-month period.
OzerF. and BlatzM.B., Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry, Compend Contin Educ Dent.34 (2013), 12–14.
2.
SalzU. and BockT., Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue – A review, J Adhes Dent.12 (2010), 343–371.
3.
PerdigãoJ. and LoguercioA.D., Universal or multi-mode adhesives: Why and how?, J Adhes Dent.16 (2014), 193–194.
4.
AmaralF.L.B.ColucciV.Palma-DibbR.G. and CoronaS.A.M., Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: A critical review, J Esthet Restor Dent.19(6) (2007), 340–353. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x.
5.
LiuY.TjaderhaneL.BreschiL.MazzoniA.LiN.MaoJ.et al., Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation, J Dent Res.90 (2011), 953–968. doi:10.1177/0022034510391799.
6.
HashimotoM.OhnoH.KagaM.EndoK.SanoH. and OguchiH., In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years, J Dent Res.79 (2000), 1385–1391. doi:10.1177/00220345000790060601.
7.
OkudaM.PereiraP.N.R.NakajimaM.TagamiJ. and PashleyD.H., Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: Nanoleakage vs. microtensile bond strength, Oper Dent.27 (2002), 289–296.
8.
De MunckJ.Van MeerbeekB.YoshidaY.InoueS.VargasM.SuzukiK.et al., Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin, J Dent Res.82 (2003), 136–140. doi:10.1177/154405910308200212.
9.
TekceN.DemirciM.TuncerS. and UysalO., Effect of different application techniques of all-in-one adhesives on microtensile bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentin, J Adhes.91 (2015), 245–261. doi:10.1080/00218464.2014.885842.
10.
HashimotoM.SanoH.YoshidaE.HoriM.KagaM.OguchiH.et al., Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding, Oper Dent.29 (2004), 416–423.
11.
ReisA.CardosoP.D.C.VieiraL.C.C.BaratieriL.N.GrandeR.H.M. and LoguercioA.D., Effect of prolonged application times on the durability of resin-dentin bonds, Dent Mater.24 (2008), 639–644. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.027.
12.
CampsJ. and PashleyD.H., Buffering action of human dentin in vitro, J Adhes Dent.2 (2000), 39–50.
13.
ItoS.TayF.R.HashimotoM.YoshiyamaM.SaitoT.BrackettW.W.et al., Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding, J Adhes Dent.7 (2005), 133–141.
14.
CarvalhoR.M.MendoncaJ.S.SantiagoS.L.SilveiraR.R.GarciaF.C.TayF.R.et al., Effects of HEMA/solvent combinations on bond strength to dentin, J Dent Res.82 (2003), 597–601. doi:10.1177/154405910308200805.
15.
GwinnettA.J., Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength, J Dent.5 (1992), 127–129.
16.
PashleyD.H.CiucchiB.SanoH. and HornerJ.A., Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents, Quintessence Int.24 (1993), 618–631.
17.
MazzoniA.AngeloniV.ApolonioF.M.ScottiN.TjaderhaneL.Tezvergil-MutluayA.et al., Effect of carbodiimide (EDC): On the bond stability of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems, Dent Mater.29 (2013), 1040–1047. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.010.
18.
TaschnerM.KummerlingM.LohbauerU.BreschiL.PetscheltA. and FrankenbergerR., Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives, Oper Dent.39 (2014), 416–426. doi:10.2341/13-168-L.
19.
PashleyE.L.AgeeK.A.PashleyD.H. and TayF.R., Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding, J. Dent.30 (2002), 83–90. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7.
20.
CardosoP.C.LoguercioA.D.VieiraL.C.C.BaratieriL.N. and ReisA., Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths, J Adhes Dent.7 (2005), 143–149.
21.
ToledanoM.ProencaJ.P.ErhardtM.C.G.OsorioE.AguileraF.S.OsorioR.et al., Increases in dentin-bond strength if doubling application time of an acetone-containing one-step adhesive, Oper. Dent.32 (2007), 133–137. doi:10.2341/06-32.
22.
ReisA.AlbuquerqueM.PeyoraroM.MatteiG.BauerJ.R.D.O.GrandeR.H.M.et al., Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin?, J. Dent.36 (2008), 309–315. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.018.
23.
SilvaA.L.F.LimaD.A.N.L.SouzaG.M.D.SantosC.T.D. and PaulilloL.A.M.S., Influence of additional adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems, Oper. Dent.31 (2006), 562–568. doi:10.2341/05-98.
24.
D’ArcangeloC.VaniniL.ProsperiG.D.Di BussoloG.De AngelisF.D’AmarioM.et al., The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems, J. Adhes. Dent.11 (2009), 109–115.
25.
MunozM.A.LuqueI.HassV.ReisA.LoguercioA.D. and BombardaN.H.C., Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine, J. Dent.41 (2013), 404–411. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.
26.
FukegawaD.HayakawaS.YoshidaY.et al., Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite, J. Dent. Res.85 (2006), 941–944. doi:10.1177/154405910608501014.
27.
WagnerA.WendlerM.PetscheltA.et al., Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes, J. Dent.42 (2014), 800–807. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.
28.
MuñozM.A.Luque-MartinezI.MalaquiasP.et al., in: Vitro Longevity of Bonding Properties of Universal Adhesives to Dentin. Oper, Vol. 40, Dent, 2015, pp. 282–292.
29.
SezinandoA.Luque-MartinezI.MuñozM.A.et al., Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives, Dent. Mater.31 (2015), 236–246. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002.
30.
RosaW.L.PivaE. and SilvaA.F., Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Dent.43 (2015), 765–776. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003.
31.
LeeI.S.SonS.A.HurB.KwonY.H. and ParkJ.K., The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength, J. Adv. Prosthodont.5 (2013), 479–484. doi:10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.479.
32.
SanoH.TakatsuT.CiucchiB.HornerJ.A.MatthewsW.G. and PashleyD.H., Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper. Dent.20 (1995), 18–25.
33.
LiH.P.BurrowM.F. and TyasM.J., The effect of long-term storage on nanoleakage, Oper. Dent.26 (2001), 609–616.
34.
HashimotoM.OhnoH.SanoH.KagaM. and OguchiH., In vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, Biomaterials.24 (2003), 3795–3803. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X.
35.
MitraS.B.LeeC.Y.BuiH.T.TantbirojnD. and RusinR.P., Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer, Dent Mater.25 (2009), 459–466. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008.
36.
LinA.McIntyreN.S. and DavidsonR.D., Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin, J Dent Res.71 (1992), 1836–1841. doi:10.1177/00220345920710111401.
37.
YoshiharaK.YoshidaY.HayakawaS.NagaokaN.ToriiY.OsakaA.et al., Self-etch monomer-calcium salt deposition on dentin, J Dent Res.90 (2011), 602–606. doi:10.1177/0022034510397197.
38.
PerdigãoJ.SezinandoA. and MonteiroP.C., Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding, Oper Dent.38 (2013), 267–274. doi:10.2341/12-307-L.
39.
MarchesiG.FrassettoA.MazzoniA.ApolonioF.DiolosaM.CadenaroM.et al., Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study, J Dent.42 (2014), 603–612. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.
40.
YoshiharaK.YoshidaY.NagaokaN.FukegawaD.HayakawaS.MineA.et al., Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction, Acta Biomaterialia.6(9) (2010), 3573–3582. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.024.
41.
ChenC.NiuL.N.XieH.ZhangZ.Y.ZhouL.Q.JiaoK.et al., Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine – Old wine in new bottles?, J Dent.43 (2015), 525–536. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
42.
PerdigãoJ.SezinandoA. and MonteiroP.C., Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive, Am J Dent.25 (2012), 153–158.
