A study of the effect of clinical washing decontamination process on corrosion resistance of Martensitic Stainless Steel 420

Abstract

Corrosion of surgical instruments provides a seat for contamination and prevents proper sterilisation, placing both patients and medical staff at risk of infection. Corrosion can also compromise the structural integrity of instruments and lead to mechanical failure in use. It is essential to understand the various factors affecting corrosion resistance of surgical instruments and how it can be minimised.

This paper investigates the effect on corrosion resistance from the clinical washing decontamination (WD) process, specifically by studying the changes in surface roughness and Cr/Fe ratio. Results indicate that the WD process provides a positive effect on smooth polished samples, while a lesser positive effect was observed on rough reflection reduced samples.

Keywords

Stainless steel surgical instrument decontamination corrosion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rutala

W.A.

and Weber

D.J.

, Disinfection and sterilization: An overview, Am. J. Infect. Control 41(Suppl. 5) (2013), S2–S5. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.11.005.

Holmes

, An Overview of Current Decontamination Practices of Surgical Instruments and Medical Devices, 2014, pp. 503–547.

Southworth

P.M.

, Infections and exposures: Reported incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of reusable surgical instruments, J. Hosp. Infect. 88(3) (2014), 127–131. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2014.08.007.

Spry

C.C.

, Care and handling of basic surgical instruments, AORN Journal 86 (2007), S77–S81. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2007.11.006.

Mainier

F.B.

et al., Corrosion in surgical instruments, IOSR Journal of Engineering 3(10) (2013), 25–31. doi:10.9790/3021-031032531.

vCJD-Ophtha Commission and Working Group, Investigation of alkaline detergents for automated reprocessing of ophthalmic surgery instruments in terms of material compatibility and alkaline residues, Zentral Sterlisation 17(4) (2009), 245–256.

Lee

S.-J.

and Lai

J.-J.

, The effects of electropolishing (

EP

) process parameters on corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140(1–3) (2003), 206–210. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00785-4.

Hilbert

L.R.

et al., Influence of surface roughness of stainless steel on microbial adhesion and corrosion resistance, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 52(3) (2003), 175–185. doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00104-5.

Zatkalikova

and Liptakova

, Pitting corrosion of stainless steel at the various surface treatment, Materials Engineering 8 (2011), 115–120.

10.

Lee

S.M.

et al., Surface roughness and the corrosion resistance of 21Cr ferritic stainless steel, Corrosion Science 63 (2012), 404–409. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.031.

11.

Landolt

, Corrosion and Surface Chemistry of Metals, 1st edn, EPFL Press, 2007, p. 400.

12.

Cunat

P.-J.

, Selection and use of stainless steels in water system [cited 22.05.2015].

13.

Trigwell

and Selvaduray

, Effect of surface treatment on the surface characteristics of AISI 316L stainless steel, in: The Materials and Processes of Medical Devices, ASM International, Boston, 2005.

14.

Freire

et al., The electrochemical behaviour of stainless steel AISI 304 in alkaline solutions with different pH in the presence of chlorides, Electrochimica Acta 56(14) (2011), 5280–5289. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.094.