WiFi-enabled buses of the Public Transportation System (PTS) may be employed as the backbone of a metropolitan delay tolerant network that exploits ad hoc connectivity and predictable bus mobility to deliver non-real time information. In this paper, we discuss and study the feasibility of a Mobile Delay Tolerant Networking (MDTN) solution deployed over an actual PTS to provide service opportunistic connectivity. Our solution follows an opportunistic carrier-based approach where buses act as data collectors for users’ requests involving Internet access. Obtained results demonstrate that MDTN represents a viable approach able to provide delay-tolerant service access. To support our claim, we have carried out a set of simulations considering MDTN coupled with state of the art routing protocols deployed over a near-to-real scenario: the PTS of Milan, Italy.
S.Ahmed and S.S.Kanhere, Cluster-based forwarding in delay tolerant public transport networks, in: Proc. of IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Washington, DC, USA, 2007, pp. 625–634.
2.
A.Balasubramanian, B.Levine and A.Venkataramani, DTN routing as a resource allocation problem, SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review37 (2007), 373–384. doi:10.1145/1282427.1282422.
3.
N.Banerjee, M.D.Corner and B.N.Levine, Design and field experimentation of an anergy-efficient architecture for DTN throwboxes, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking18 (2010), 554–567. doi:10.1109/TNET.2009.2039491.
4.
A.Bujari, A survey of opportunistic data gathering and dissemination techniques, in: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Munich, Germany, 2012.
5.
A.Bujari, A network coverage algorithm for message broadcast in vehicular networks, Mobile Networks and Applications21(4) (2016), 668–676. doi:10.1007/s11036-016-0723-7.
6.
A.Bujari and C.E.Palazzi, Opportunistic communication for the Internet of everything, in: Proc. of IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, 2014, pp. 502–507.
7.
J.Burgess, B.Gallagher, D.Jensen and B.N.Levine, Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks, in: Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2006, pp. 1–11.
8.
S.Burleigh, A.Hooke, L.Torgerson, K.Fall, V.Cerf, B.Durst, K.Scott and H.Weiss, Delay-tolerant networking: An approach to interplanetary Internet, IEEE Communications Magazine41(6) (2003), 128–136. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2003.1204759.
9.
Cisco VNI, Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2015–2020. Cisco, 2016.
10.
M.Demmer and K.Fall, Dtlsr: Delay tolerant routing for developing regions, in: Proc. of NSDR Workshop, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp. 1–6.
11.
U.Drolia, R.Martins, J.Tan, A.Chheda, M.Sanghavi, R.Gandhi and P.Narasimhan, The case for mobile edge-clouds, in: Proc. of International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, 2013, pp. 209–215.
12.
S.Gaito, D.Maggiorini, E.Pagani and G.P.Rossi, Distance vector routing for public transportation vehicular networks: Performance evaluation on a real topology, in: Proc. of IFIP Wireless Days, 2009, pp. 1–5.
13.
S.Gaito, D.Maggiorini, G.P.Rossi and S.Alessandra, Bus switched networks: An ad hoc mobile platform enabling urban-wide communications, Ad Hoc Networks6 (2012), 931–945. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.12.005.
14.
GloMoSim, Global Mobile information system Simulation Library, http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu/projects/glomosim/.
15.
C.Gomez and J.Paradells, Urban automation networks: Current and emerging solutions for sensed data collection and actuation in smart cities, Sensors15 (2015), 22874–22898. doi:10.3390/s150922874.
16.
Google Transit, http://transit.google.com/.
17.
S.G.Hong, S.Seo, H.Schulzrinne and P.Chitrapu, ICOW: Internet access in public transit systems, IEEE Communications Magazine53(6) (2015), 134–141. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2015.7120029.
18.
P.Hui, J.Crowcroft and E.Yoneki, Bubble rap: Social-based forwarding in delay tolerant networks, in: Proc. of ACM MobiHoc, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 241–250.
19.
J.Jetcheva, Y.C.Hu, S.PalChaudhuri, A.Saha and D.Johnson, Design and evaluation of a metropolitan area multitier wireless ad hoc network architecture, in: Proc. of ACM HotMobile, 2003, pp. 32–43.
20.
A.Lindgren, A.Doria and O.Schelén, Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks, SIGMOBILE Mobile Computer Communication Review7 (2003), 19–20. doi:10.1145/961268.961272.
21.
C.Liu and J.Wu, An optimal probabilistic forwarding protocol in delay tolerant networks, in: Proc. of ACM MobiHoc, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 105–114.
22.
M.Musolesi and C.Mascolo, Car: Context-aware adaptive routing for delay-tolerant mobile networks, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing8(2) (2009), 246–260. doi:10.1109/TMC.2008.107.
23.
S.Nelson, M.Bakht and R.Kravets, Encounter-based routing in DTNs, in: Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2009, pp. 846–854.
24.
NS3 Network Simulator, https://www.nsnam.org/.
25.
C.E.Palazzi, S.Ferretti and M.Roccetti, Communities on the road: Fast triggering of interactive multimedia services, Multimedia Tools and Applications44(2) (2009), 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11042-009-0292-x.
26.
C.E.Palazzi, A.Bujari, G.Marfia and M.Roccetti, An overview of opportunistic ad hoc communication in urban scenarios, in: Proc. of Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop, MED-HOC-NET, Piran, Slovenia, 2014.
27.
C.E.Palazzi, F.Pezzoni and P.M.Ruiz, Delay-bounded data gathering in urban vehicular sensor networks, Pervasive and Mobile Computing8(2) (2012), 180–193. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2011.06.008.
28.
C.Pei-Chun, C.L.Kevin, M.Gerla and H.Jérôme, GeoDTN+nav: Geographic DTN routing with navigator prediction for urban vehicular environments, Springer Mobile Networks and Applications15(1) (2010), 61–82. doi:10.1007/s11036-009-0181-6.
29.
L.Pelusi, A.Passarella and M.Conti, Opportunistic networking: Data forwarding in disconnected mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Communications Magazine44(11) (2006), 134–141. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2006.248176.
30.
A.Pentland, R.Fletcherand and A.Hasson, Daknet: Rethinking connectivity in developing nations, Computer37(1) (2004), 78–83. doi:10.1109/MC.2004.1260729.
31.
C.Quadri, D.Maggiorini, S.Gaito and G.P.Rossi, On the scalability of delay-tolerant routing protocols in urban environment, in: Proc. of IFIP Wireless Days, 2011, pp. 1–6.
32.
M.Sede, X.Li, D.Li, M.Y.Wu, M.Li and W.Shu, Routing in large-scale buses ad hoc networks, in: Proc. of IEEE WCNC, 2008, pp. 2711–2716.
33.
The ONE, The Opportunistic Network Environment simulator, https://akeranen.github.io/the-one/.
34.
Q.Yuan, I.Cardei and J.Wu, Predict and relay: An efficient routing in disruption-tolerant networks, in: Proc. of ACM MobiHoc, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 95–104.
35.
X.Zhang, J.Kurose, B.N.Levine, D.Towsley and H.Zhang, Study of a bus-based disruption-tolerant network: Mobility modeling and impact on routing, in: Proc. of ACM MobiCom, New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp. 195–206.
