Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-triggered mortality is significantly higher in older than in younger populations worldwide. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is related to aging and was recently reported to be among the major risk factors for COVID-19 mortality in older people. The symptomatology of COVID-19 indicates that lethal outcomes of infection rely on neurogenic mechanisms. The present review compiles the available knowledge pointing to the convergence of COVID-19 complications with the mechanisms of autonomic dysfunctions in AD and aging. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is prone to neuroinvasion from the lung along the vagus nerve up to the brainstem autonomic nervous centers involved in the coupling of cardiovascular and respiratory rhythms. The brainstem autonomic network allows SARS-CoV-2 to trigger a neurogenic switch to hypertension and hypoventilation, which may act in synergy with aging- and AD-induced dysautonomias, along with an inflammatory “storm”. The lethal outcomes of COVID-19, like in AD and unhealthy aging, likely rely on a critical hypoactivity of the efferent vagus nerve cholinergic pathway, which is involved in lowering cardiovascular pressure and systemic inflammation tone. We further discuss the emerging evidence supporting the use of 1) the non-invasive stimulation of vagus nerve as an additional therapeutic approach for severe COVID-19, and 2) the demonstrated vagal tone index, i.e., heart rate variability, via smartphone-based applications as a non-serological low-cost diagnostic of COVID-19. These two well-known medical approaches are already available and now deserve large-scale testing on human cohorts in the context of both AD and COVID-19.

Keywords

Brainstem dysautonomia heart rate variability neuro-immune axis pulmonary ventilation vagus nerve vagus nerve stimulation

COVID-19 is a new infectious disease consisting primarily of acute respiratory distress, caused by a novel coronavirus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is characterized by the high mortality rate among the older subjects: up to 22.9% in people above 90 years in Italy versus less than 2% in the general population [1]. The elderly population also suffers a higher prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD, 32% of people older than 84 years) than in younger subjects [2]. AD was recently demonstrated among major risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality [3, 4]. Furthermore, COVID-19 severity is statistically predicted by the APOE ɛ4 genotype, one of the major genetic risk factors for AD [5]. The recent epidemiological data thus suggest a link between aging and AD regarding fatal outcomes of COVID-19 [6]. Another possible link between aging, AD, and COVID19 concerns a common range of dysfunctions of the autonomic nervous system, or dysautonomia, along with an increased systemic inflammation tone [7, 8]. The lethal outcomes of COVID-19 might be due to post-infection hypertension and hypoventilation, which is caused by nervous dysfunction of autonomic brainstem centers and reflexes. This present review focuses on the dysfunctions of the vital reflexes mediated by the autonomic system and ensuring the regulation of blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory ventilation. These neural functions are altogether mediated by the vagus nerve and its brainstem centers, both known as a route for neuroinvasion by coronaviruses and a well-established neuroimmune interface [9]. This aspect of SARS-Cov-2-triggered neurogenic pathology has been overviewed in the published surveys of neurological associations of COVID-19 [10 –12]. However, most of these previous reviews considered only co-morbidities such as meningitis, encephalopathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome of the peripheral nervous system, neuropathies, and increased cerebrovascular risk without considering neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [10]. Only a recent one has included autonomic dysfunction in an exhaustive description of all published symptoms, including respiratory and circulatory distresses [13]. Based on the growing body of knowledge, this present review expands the recently provided evidence pointing to a pathological link between COVID-19 and AD [13] to underlying neural substrate involving the vagus nerve and its brainstem centers. We further propose to test a recent medical innovation such as non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation via external ear in COVID-19, an approach which has recently been proposed to improve cognitive disorders including AD [14]. We finally discuss clinical data supporting the testing of vagal tone index via heart rate variability as an asymptomatic diagnostic marker of infection by SARS-CoV-2.

For the purpose of the present review, our methodology consisted in a bibliographic search crossing the following keywords: COVID-19, Alzheimer’s Disease, aging, pathophysiology, dysautonomia, SARS-CoV-2 dysautonomia, neuroinvasion, Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-2, Angiotensin, vagal afferents, autonomic brainstem centers, lung, dorsal vagal complex, nuc-leus tractus solitarius, area postrema, cytokine storm, immunological reflex, cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, cardiovascular, respiratory drive, vagal ne-rve stimulation, transauricular vagal nerve stimulation, auricular vagus nerve, heart rate variability.

THE VAGUS NERVE AS A ROUTE OF SARS-COV-2 INVASION OF THE BRAINSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR CARDIO-RESPIRATORY FAILURE AND UNCONTROLLED INFLAMMATION

The vagus nerve is the tenth (Xth) pair cranial nerve, which encompasses mostly viscero-sensory afferents and parasympathetic efferents, to- and from discrete brainstem nuclei. The vagal viscerosensory afferents arise in all visceras as free and ramified nerve terminals belonging to glutamatergic neurons, the cell bodies of which are located in the nodose ganglion (close to the spinal cord in the neck) and project to the nucleus tractus solitarius in the brainstem (Fig. 1) [15, 16]. The vagal efferents consist essentially in the axons of the large cholinergic neurons stacked in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (Fig. 1), that project to all visceras and trigger their actions via cholinergic, local neurons located in intravisceral ganglia [16]. The synaptically interconnected afferents and efferents of the vagus nerve within the dorsal vagal complex of the brainstem yield reflex circuits that provide the anatomical substratum of the vital homeostatic regulations. This connectome is currently being revisited with brain imaging approaches, both in human subjects and in animal models [17].

Fig. 1

Neuroanatomical connectivity of the dorsal vagal complex in human brainstem: the “vital node” of pioneer physiologists. Round symbols represent neuronal perikarya. Arrows with blunt end symbolize axonal presynaptic endings. AP, area postrema; CAP, cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway; CNS, central nervous system; DMNX, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; PNS, peripheral nervous system; IV^th, fourth intracerebral ventricle.

The pathophysiology of COVID-19

COVID-19 disease progression comprises three distinct but overlapping phases: an early infection phase, a pulmonary phase, and a severe hyper-infl-ammation phase [13, 18].

In the early infection phase, the virus infiltr-ates the upper airway tract, lung parenchyma, eyes, and gut. From a recently published exten-sive survey of literature [13], the first symptoms appear in average 5.2 days after initial cont-amination and encompass fever, cough, dysp-nea, fatigue, nausea, anosmia, and ageusia. This initial phase is associated with innate immu-nity response, which is marked by an increased plasma concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and activation of monocytes and mac-rophages, along with a rise of plasmatic amy-loid-A protein [13]. Activated monocytes and macrophages have been indeed detected in bro-nchial and alveolar epithelia by immunohis-tochemistry after ex-vivo infection of human biopsies with SARS-CoV-2 [19].

During the pulmonary phase, collateral tissue injury and subsequent inflammatory proce-sses—vasodilation, increased endothelial permeability, and leukocyte recruitment—lead to further pulmonary damage, hypoxemia (with a frequent atypical clinical presentation called “happy hypoxemia” [20] where severe hypoxemia is associated neither with dyspnea nor abnormal lung compliance), and cardiovascular complications (see below).

In a delayed hyperinflammatory phase occurring only in 10–20% of the patients, mainly older people, the host inflammatory response continues to amplify (even with diminishing viral loads) and yields a systemic inflammation along with cardio-respiratory dysregulation [21], coagulopathy [22], and multiple organ failures. This outcome can lead to death within a period ranging from 6 to 41 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms (see above) [13]. This life-challenging phase is likely to have a neurogenic origin, as indicated by case reports of COVID-19 patients who deceased in hospital due to depressed respiratory ventilation after having recovered from pneumonia, and despite ongoing invasive mechanical ventilation [23]. Consistently, experimental infection of mice with a SARS-Cov-2-related virus was shown to trigger early depression of hypercapnic ventilator responses [24]. The symptoms of this late phase altogether indicate a dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system involving an increased sympathetic tone and a decreased parasympathetic tone (Table 1) [13]. The sympathetic/parasympathetic balance at the organism level is controlled by the dorsal vagal complex of the brainstem (see Fig. 1 for details).

Table 1

Comparative dysautonomia in severe COVID-19, Alzheimer’s disease, and nondemented aging

Symptoms	Severe COVID-19	Alzheimer’s disease	Non-demented aging
Arterial blood pressure
Heart rate
Cardiac failure risk
Baroreflex sensitivity
Respiratory ventilation
Chemoreflex sensitivity
Parasympathetic cholinergic tonus
Sympathetic tonus
NTS relay
Heart rate variability
Systemic inflammation
Pro-inflammatory cytokine release
Anti-inflammatory cytokine release
Orthostatic hypotension	–	+
Constipation	–	+
Urinary incontinence	–	+
Dysphagia, swallowing dysfunction	–	+
Impaired pain perception	–	+

Arrows pointing up and down respectively mean increase and decrease. Double arrows indicate major variations. Arrows with dashed line indicate minor variations. (+) and (–) mean presence and absence respectively.

This late phase involves a “cytokine storm” (also called macrophage activation syndrome), as observed in various infectious and non-infectious diseases, i.e., an excessive inflammatory response caused by a dysregulated host immune response [25]. The COVID-19 cytokine storm is marked in the systemic circulation by rises of CRP and of activated monocytes-macrophages and affects multiple organs [26]. The mechanism underlying cytokine storm is the failure of inflammatory response regulation back to homeostasis, which normally results from the “inflammatory reflex” defined by Tracey as “a neural loop in which afferent inflammatory signals activate an opposing motor response of the vagus nerve that suppresses cytokine production in order to limit or prevent damage” [27].

Beyond the lung, SARS-Cov-2 displays tropism for the vagus nerve and its centers

The initial event of COVID-19 is an infection of human cells by SARS-Cov-2 via stereospecific binding of its envelope S protein (SPIKE) to Angiote-nsin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) at the cell membrane and subsequent internalization of the complex [28], which occurs initially in the upper airway and the lung. ACE2 expression has indeed been dem-onstrated in all cell types of the human airway epithelium by tissue- and single-cell RNA-seque-ncing from bronchoscopy biopsies of 267 subjects [29]. The viral infection has been observed by applying SARS-CoV-2 particles from nasopharyngeal aspirate of a human COVID-19 patient, on ex-vivo cultures of respiratory tract mucosae and in-vitro cultures of alveolar epithelial cells from healthy human donors [19]. In human biopsies, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected by immunohistochemistry in all differentiated cell types of the airway mucosa and of the alveolar epithelium, aging being related with increased ACE2 protein expression and decreased apoptosis effectors [30]. Its replication period is 2–4 days in both airway- and alveolar tissues [19]. The lung-originating infection, propagation, and viral multiplication rate have been confirmed and detailed in a transgenic mouse overexpressing the human ACE2 gene [31]. Importantly, in the human olfactory epithelium, ACE2 was recently revealed by immunohistofluorescence to be localized exclusively in the non-neuronal sustentacular cells, and not in the centrally projecting olfactory sensory neurons [32]. Consistently, single-cell transcriptomal analysis of the murine nasal mucosa lately revealed that SARS-CoV-2 entry genes are expressed exclusively in non-neuronal cells of the olfactory epithelium [33]. These observations render unlikely the nose-to-brain route of SARS-Cov-2 neuroinvasion that has been repetitively postulated since the beginning of COVID-19 pandemy.

ACE2 is ubiquitously expressed in numerous other tissues, encompassing about 150 different cell types [34]. Quantitative comparisons with transcriptomic assays and or comparative immunohistochemistry have all established that the highest ACE2 expressions are found in intestine, followed by testis, gallbladder, kidney, heart muscle, all far above lung and brain levels [34 –36]. Remarkably, SARS-CoV-2 triggers ACE2 downregulation from the infected cells’ plasma membranes and thus lowers tissue capacity to degrade the bioactive vasoconstrictor hormone angiotensin-II into its vasorelaxant and anti-inflammatory metabolite angiotensin-(1–7), which in turn yields increased concentration of bioactive angiotensin-II locally in SARS-CoV-2-infected tissues [37].

In the murine brain, extensive mapping of the ACE2 protein by immunohistochemistry showed that ACE2 is expressed exclusively by neurons, and not by glial cells, with the highest densities of ACE2 protein occurring in the three interconnected components of the dorsal vagal complex of the brainstem (Fig. 1): 1) the viscerosensory nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), 2) the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (providing efferent innervation of all viscera, including the heart), and 3) the neuro-hemal structure: area postrema [38 –40]. These ACE2-enriched structures of the posterior brain represent the superior autonomic nuclei [15, 41], i.e., the centers of the major homeostatic reflexes in mammals (including the baroreflex, the chemoreflex, and the inflammatory reflex, as detailed below). Importantly, the thresholds of these homeostatic reflexes are modulable via cellular plasticity mechanisms such as synaptic efficacies, neurotrophin signaling, axonal sprouting, and neurogenesis [42]. The vagal afferents from the lung arise from peripheral sensory endings that were observed by electron microscopy in direct juxtaposition with the alveolar epithelium in the adult rat, on the basal pole of and in-between the epithelial cells [43, 44]. These vagal sensory fibers belong to glutamatergic neurons having their perikarya in the peripheral nodose ganglion and projecting directly into the brainstem nucleus tractus solitarius [15]. Since SARS-CoV-2 displays neurotropic property, it could be uptaken by the vagal nerve endings of the lung alveolae up to the NTS [28], and probably spread away trans-synaptically in the nervous system [45]. Consistently, experimental infection of transgenic ACE2-overexpressing mice with another SARS-coronavirus, either by nasal inspiration or by transcranial injection, led to the specific expression of the viral antigen in neurons of the three components of the brainstem dorsal vagal complex by four days after infection [46], i.e., not much longer than the time lag for the initial replication in the lung [19, 31]. This delay for SARS-CoV to migrate from the lung to the brainstem via the vagus nerve to invade the NTS, seems likely to fit with the time-course of atypical hypoxemia and delayed acute respiratory distress syndrome in severe COVID-19 patients, as already suggested by Li et al. [47].

In line with this statement, the neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 per se has been recently demonstrated in vitro, using cultures of neural cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells [48]. In these neural cells in vitro, moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection was shown to significantly increase apoptotic death incidence by three times over controls at 1–3 days after infection [48]. The latter observations altogether suggest that the neuroinvasion of the brainstem dorsal vagal complex by SARS-CoV-2 in the course of COVID-19 can rapidly trigger neurodegeneration in this integrative center of the autonomic nervous system; this issue should now be assessed directly by histopathology on postmortem brainstem samples from patients deceased with severe COVID-19.

Besides, SARS-CoV-2 can also gain access to the dorsal vagal complex via blood circulation at the level of the area postrema (Fig. 1), due to the lack of blood-brain-barrier in this neurohemal structure [15, 47].

To sum up, the dorsal vagal complex of the brainstem can be a target of SARS-CoV-2 because of its specifically high enrichment in ACE2 and could be reached readily by the virus through two distinct lung-to-brain routes: the vagus nerve and the blood circulation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

The vagal routes of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion. In COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 can gain access to the ACE2-rich dorsal vagal complex either via blood at the level of the neuro-hemal structure area postrema, or via intraneuronal transport through the vagal sensory innervation of the lung alveaolar epithelium. SARS-CoV-2 binding to ACE2 in the dorsal vagal complex yields decreased tissue concentration of ACE2, which in turn increases the ratio between local concentrations of angiotensin-II above its counter-regulatory angiotensin-(1–7) metabolite. This imbalance in the superior autonomic centers worsens the aging-related decline in baroreflex sensitivity and cardiovascular function. Concomitantly, SARS-CoV-2 invasion of the brainstem counteracts the efferent arm of the inflammatory reflex, leading to multi-organ failure through a cytokine storm. Non-medicamentous stimulation of the auricular vagus nerve is likely to restore vagus nerve functions compromised by SARS-CoV2 infection. Green plain circles represent neuronal perikarya; the yellow arrow indicates the therapeutic auricular vagus nerve stimulation (see text).

THE NEUROGENIC DYSAUTONOMIA OF COVID-19: SIMILARITIES WITH AD AND AGING

In physiological conditions, both cardiorespiratory and immune responses, which are severely impaired in COVID-19, are tightly regulated by the autonomic system centers. Dysregulation of these physiological responses, known as dysautonomia, has been pre-viously reported in AD as “damage to the autono-mic nervous system that impairs function beyond compensatory mechanisms” [49]. In this section, we will first provide general principles behind the physiological regulation of cardiorespiratory and im-mune functions and then discuss the relevant dysregulations, i.e., dysautonomia in COVID-19, AD, and aging without dementia.

General considerations: the central autonomic network

Cardio-respiratory regulation is tightly dependent on the baroreflex and the chemoreflex, both involving the vagus nerve and its brainstem centers [50, 51]. The heart rate is tightly linked with the respiratory ventilation cycle since it accelerates during inspiration and decelerates during expiration [52] due to the respiratory sinus arrhythmia, which is itself driven by variations in vagal chronotropic drive [53]. The core breathing rhythm and pattern is determined by a neural pacemaker network in the brainstem: the pre-Bötzinger complex, which is interconnected with cardiovascular regulatory centers of the brainstem via the vagal viscero-sensory NTS [54] (Fig. 1). The steady-state synchrony of the cardio-respiratory rhythm in healthy adults was shown to arise from brainstem centers that altogether determine the vagal efferent activity [55]. The myocardium-innervating vagal efferent fibers arise from two distinct nuclei of the brainstem: the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and the nucleus ambiguous [52]. Using pharmacogenetic approaches in awake rats, it has been demonstrated that the neuronal activities of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus are required and sufficient to allow exercise-related capacity and endurance adaptation [56].

The dorsal vagal complex is a target of the hyper-tensive hormone angiotensin-II, which is a key component of systemic cardiovascular regulation [57, 58]. Specific angiotensin-II receptors include two subtypes with opposite physiological effects: AT1-R and AT2-R, which respectively mediate increase- and decrease of arterial pressure and heart rate (reviewed in [37]). Angiotensin-II binds to both AT1 and AT2 receptors, whereas ACE2-generated angiotensin-(1–7) binds only the vasorelaxant AT2- R and Mas receptor (Fig. 2) [37]. The vagal visce-rosensory NTS, area postrema, and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMNV) are all enriched in the hypertensive AT1-R [59]; the hypotensive AT2-R occurs in NTS and DMNV [60] and the hypotensive Mas receptors in NTS only [61]. Angiotensin-II via AT1 receptors of NTS decreases baroreflex sensitivity and increases arterial blood pressure and heart rate [62], whereas experimental overexpression of AT2 receptors in NTS by pharmacogenetics improves baroreflex efficiency in the adult spontaneously hyp-ertensive rat [63].

In addition, the vagus nerve and its brainstem centers down-regulate inflammatory and immune responses via two neural connections: 1) the noradrenergic projection from the vagal sensory nucleus NTS to the neuroendocrine paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, stimulating the secretion of the anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid hormone via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and 2) the cho-linergic projection from the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus to the spleen and activated immune cells, or cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) [64]. Indeed, in vivo electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve prevents the acute inflammatory response to bacterial toxin injection. Moreover, in vitro, the synthesis of the major pro-inflammatory cytokine Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) by macrophage cultures is inhibited by the neuro-transmitter acetylcholine [65]. Reciprocally, the surgical section of the vagus nerve (or vagotomy) resulted in vivo in enhanced TNF-alpha production and excessive response to endotoxin administration [65]. Furthermore, vagus nerve stimulation reduces inflammation in several experimental models indu-cing pro-inflammatory cytokines by activating the alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of macropha-ges [66]. In mice deficient for the latter receptor, endotoxin-induced TNF-alpha production is increased, and electrical vagus stimulation fails to reduce serum TNF-alpha levels [66]. More precisely, such macrophage-inhibiting action of the vagus nerve is mediated by acetylcholine-secreting, splenic T-lymphocytes, as demonstrated in a mouse model [67].

The efferent immunosuppressor component of the vagus nerve arises from the DMNV (Fig. 1). It is recruited physiologically in the course of microbial infections or systemic inflammation, by afferent sti-mulation of vagal sensory fibers that express receptors for pro-inflammatory cytokines and project on the viscerosensory NTS (Fig. 1), in the context of the classical “inflammatory reflex” [64, 68]. In the adult mice, implantation of cuff electrodes at the surface of the cervical vagus nerve and compute-rized neural-to-noise analysis of electrical discharge pattern allowed to identify vagal subsets of sensory fibers [69]. These fibers respond to specific cytokines (especially pro-inflammatory ones) in a dose-dependent manner [69]. It should be stressed that the progress in understanding the mechanisms behind neuro-immune communication has allowed for decoding vagal activity patterns in relation to specific diseases [70].

Altogether, the dorsal vagal complex of the brainstem is an integrative center involved in both cardi-orespiratory regulation and post-inflammation return to homeostasis.

Dysautonomia in COVID-19

The first acute consequence of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion into the dorsal vagal complex consists of lowering the tissue concentration of its receptor ACE2 and therefore yields a local increase in angiotensin-II concentration (see above). This hypertensive hormone acts primarily in the dorsal vagal complex to raise blood pressure and heart pumping, which are subsequently potentiated in COVID-19. In parallel, tissue concentration of the ACE2-generated inhibitory feedback metabolite of angiotensin-II: angiotensin-(1–7) decreases [37]. This angiotensinergic imbalance in the superior autonomic center has been established to cause or worsen a decline in baroreflex sensitivity and switch cardiovascular regulation to hypertension [58]. Reciprocally, experimental overexpression of ACE2 by gene transfer into the NTS of an adult spontaneously hypertensive rat was shown to significantly improve the baroreceptor heart rate reflex above controls [71].

The delayed cardiorespiratory symptoms in se-vere COVID-19 cases include heart palpitations, arrhythmias, myocardial injury, hypertension, chest tightness, and ventilatory dysfunction [72, 73, 72, 73]. Furthermore, in COVID-19 patients, the regulation of respiratory ventilation displays aberrant responses to afferent hypoxia stimuli from the peripheral che-moreceptors (the carotid bodies) [20]. This symptom indicates a drop in the NTS relay of chemoreflex, which may be due to SARS-CoV-2-triggered neurodegeneration (see above section).

A neurogenic model of direct SARS-Cov-2 impact on the brainstem autonomic centers has been recently modelized using a computational approach [74]. Also, most of the clinical characteristics of severe COVID-19, including the “cytokine storm” [26, 75] during the third phase of SARS-CoV2 infection, can be explained by dysregulation of the CAP pathway [76, 77].

Dysautonomia in Alzheimer’s disease

Interestingly, the recently reported COVID-19-related autonomic dysfunction has been characterized in AD for three decades [7] and proposed to develop in the preclinical phase of the disease [78]. The most common symptoms of AD-associated dysautonomia are cardiac failure or infarction [79], blood pressure dysregulation [80], decreased baro-reflex function [81], bronchopneumonia [82], par-asympathetic drive hypofunction [83], altered pain perception and reactivity [84], and orthostatic hypo-tension [7]. In AD patients, lower cognitive performance (especially regarding memory) was related to significantly higher cardiac sympathetic and lower parasympathetic function, independently of age, sex, academic years, diabetes, hypertension, and cho-linesterase inhibitor use [85].

These symptoms are attributed to neurodegeneration, including neurofibrillary pathology, that have been mapped in the brainstem centers: in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (which fits with the parasympathetic hypofunction) and to various extents in the NTS, nucleus ambiguous, pre-Bötzinger complex [49 , 86–88]. This brainstem neuropathology appears at the Braak’s stage VI of AD, i.e., at mid-course of a 20–25 year-long pathological process [88].

Dysautonomia in aging without dementia

Aging is classically associated with cardiovascular decline and morbidity, which involve decreased parasympathetic activity, blunted baroreflex sensitivity [89], and decline of vagally-modulated heart rate variability [90]. In addition, aging is associated with a systemic rise of inflammation, known as “inflammaging”, and is “macrophage-centered” [8, 91]. Since macrophages are both a major source of systemic inflammation and the main target of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, inflammaging is likely to result from the hypofunction of the CAP. Strengthening the CAP has indeed been proposed as a new therapeutic perspective in aging-related disorders [92].

In summary, the dysautonomia is associated with COVID-19, AD, and dementia-free aging, which all share some similarities (Table 1). It is particularly noteworthy that the baroreflex in AD patients is chronically reduced, which can underlie the much higher incidence of severe COVID-19 in this sub-population [6]. The failure of the CAP is shared by COVID-19, AD, and dementia-free aging, although along a very different time course (chronic in AD and aging versus acute in COVID-19), which likely corroborates aging and or AD as major risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality. The survey of underlying mechanisms and pathways helps now to propose original, non-serological tools for COVID-19 therapy and or diagnostic.

AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION AS AN INNOVATIVE THERAPEUTIC TOOL IN COVID-19

Auricular stimulation of the vagus nerve is a non-invasive approach that is increasingly used in the-rapeutic handling of pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, depression, and other diseases [93]. This therapy re-lies on the anatomy of the vagus nerve. Indeed, the common cranial trunk of this nerve includes a cervical sensory branch from the ear [94 –96].

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a polyvalent tool in human clinics

VNS in human patients relies on the permanent implant of a cuff electrode on the left vagus nerve (to avoid cardiac side-effects) at the neck level, which is connected by a subcutaneous wire to a pac-emaker-like programmable electronic device. This intervention was approved three decades ago by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment-resistant patients with epilepsy and major depressive disorder. The appropriate treatment consists typically in daily 30-second stimulation at 1mA output current with a 20 Hz frequency of 500 microsecond pulses during several months [97]. The parameters of the vagus nerve stimulator are adjusted during in-office visits by treating physicians to optimize therapeutics by-side effects. VNS also proved beneficial in various cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases [98].

In the AD field, the above-discussed invasive VNS has already been applied during 6–12 months on cohorts of AD patients and yielded significant cognitive-enhancing effects [14 , 100].

Studies in animal models demonstrated that VNS resets the baroreflex setpoint and induces inhibition of sympathetic efferents [101, 102], which was also recorded in humans [103]. Of interest, when considering the COVID-19 pandemic, VNS could impact not only on systemic inflammation but also on the coagulant-anticoagulant balance, as suggested by VNS application in endotoxemia rats [104]. In a clinically relevant porcine model of progressive sepsis, VNS significantly attenuated multiple organ dysfunctions (with partial or complete prevention of hyperlactatemia, hyperdynamic circulation, cellular myocardial depression, shift in sympathovagal balance toward sympathetic dominance, cardiac myocardial dysfunction and reduction of activated monocytes), thus reducing vasopressor and fluid resuscitation requirements [105].

Therefore, it is likely that VNS could attenuate the clinical manifestations of severe COVID-19, as recently suggested [75]. However, VNS requires an invasive surgical procedure for electrode implantation (see above), not an option in COVID-19 pandemics. Conversely, a non-invasive modality of vagus nerve stimulation has been developed, making it more accessible as a possible first-line treatment option (see next section).

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation as a novel therapeutic approach for COVID-19?

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive procedure consisting of electrical current application through surface electrodes at select locations, most commonly targeting either the cervical branch of the vagus nerve in the neck or the auricular branch of the vagus nerve [106]. Considering these two techniques (cervical or auricular) of tVNS, the cervical location makes selective transcutaneous stimulation of the vagus nerve fibers difficult, because of the presence of both afferent and efferent fibers [107]. By contrast, the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is an exclusively afferent, sensory nerve that innervates part of the skin of the outer ear [94 –96]. Hence, trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) targets only the afferent arm of the vagus nerve.

The optimal location and electrical stimulation parameters providing the greatest tVNS therapeutic effect can be efficiently assessed with heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring. HRV, a biomarker for efferent vagal activation [108], is easier to assess with taVNS than with cervical tVNS [107]. taVNS is mostly used in pharmaco-resistant epilepsy, depression, hypertension, and other diseases [93, 105–107 , 93, 105–107]. A recent study has validated the use of taVNS to inhibit both peripheral and central inflammation and suggested a link between taVNS suppression of inflammation and effectiveness in reducing depression severity [109]. Closer to COVID-19 symptoms, a prospective randomized study on 100 respiratory distressed patients undergoing lobectomy via thoracotomy showed that taVNS could significantly decrease IL-6 and IL-10 levels, reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia and shorten duration of hospitalization time [110]. Since drugs commonly prescribed to psychiatric patients could protect them from SARS-CoV-2 infection [111], taVNS suppression of neuroinflammation and depression may turn out to be also neuroprotective in the context of COVID-19. So far, however, to the best of our knowledge, only two studies using taVNS (Gammacore®) in COVID-19 patients [112, 113] have been published reporting: 1) a clinical respiratory benefit in two ambulatory COVID-19 patients using cervical tVNS [112]; 2) an ongoing prospective, randomized controlled study on tVNS in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 respiratory symptoms [113]. Based on this emerging awareness, an International Consortium on Neuromodulation for COVID-19 (ICNC) has been created in early 2020, in order to “provide global leadership for the rapid advancement and clinical adoption of neuromodulation technologies to treat emerging infectious diseases” [114].

Experimental animal studies confirmed the benefits of tVNS by using endotoxemic rodent models and shed light on underlying mechanisms [115, 116]. Remarkably, taVNS also reduced cognitive dysfunction in a postoperative model of aged rats [117] and in a murine model of AD [118] via a decrease of neuroinflammation. In human clinics, however, taVNS has not been tested so far in AD [14, 119].

It remains now to test taVNS impact on AD symptoms in human cohorts, as already suggested for COVID-19 [75].

AMBULATORY MONITORING OF AURICULAR VAGAL TONE THROUGH HEART RATE VARIABILITY PROVIDES AN ATTRACTIVE PRE-DIAGNOSIS TOOL IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Clinical trials of COVID-19 therapy [77] would undoubtedly benefit from HRV monitoring. HRV is defined as an irregularity of the length of consecutive heart cycles, which reflects the ability of the cardiovascular system to adapt to different situations in everyday life [120]. HRV is calculated based on the R-R interval of the classical PQRS electrocardiogram wave [121]. In the last decades, HRV analysis has emerged as a new useful tool for assessing the changes in autonomic tone that impact on cardiovascular function. HRV is now both considered as an excellent read-out of taVNS [108] and a physiologic marker that provides better and more accurate early warning signs of disease states [122]. Moreover, HRV monitoring based on real-time measurements is easy to get at the bedside.

The most common way of measuring HRV is either time-domain analysis or frequency domain analysis. Parameters calculated from the measurements are related to the functions of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system [122], which altogether correspond to “autonomic function”. The reduction of the fluctuations of the length of consecutive heart cycles has been shown to be associated with pathological conditions, especially in case of inflammation [123, 124, 123, 124].

As a consequence, measurements of changes in autonomic function is crucial in the clinical follow-up of different diseases as well as of the therapeutic efficacy. Several large epidemiological studies have shown that low HRV is a common risk factor for mortality and morbidity, in particular in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) [125] and sepsis [126 –128].

In line with pioneer observations of Claude-Bernard, Thayer and Lane have proposed that HRV could also be an index of the level to which the brain generates an adaptive peripheral body’s response to environmental changes [129]. A very recent study confirms that HRV analysis provides insight into a “brain-heart-axis” in old patients with mild cognitive impairments, suggesting that this autonomic assessment could help to identify subjects at higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially among AD patients [130].

Moreover, in addition to the insight in brain-heart axis, HRV appears useful for early screening of infection, with a significant predictive value since HRV alteration is detectable before clinical diagnosis [120] as well as for its very good sensitivity, though low specificity [131, 132]. It is noteworthy that correlations between HRV drop and the onset of sepsis have been found in neonates up to 4 days prior to clinical diagnosis of systemic inflammatory syndrome [133]. Moreover, in the same clinical trial, after treatment and recovery from sepsis, HRV returned to its baseline value [133]. Remarkably, combining HRV monitoring with artificial intelligence-based analysis allows to efficiently predict the onset of sepsis [134]. Since life-threatening forms of COVID-19 involve a systemic inflammatory surge similar to sepsis, future HRV assessment in a large cohort of COVID-19 and healthy subjects is worth doing. Indeed, HRV monitoring is now possible not only in intensive care units [135], but also at a populational level due to the wide use of smartphones and both iOS and Android HRV applications [136, 137, 136, 137]. Notably, a few years ago, a study suggested that such ambulatory monitoring of heart rate in 43 individuals up to 2 years could allow early sepsis detection with 100% sensitivity [138]. Thus, population-wide longitudinal HRV digital monitoring might enable early screening of SARS-CoV2 infection worldwide.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, the vagus nerve seems to be “a conduit for neuroinvasion” by SARS-COV-2, “a diagnostic tool and a therapeutic pathway” for COVID-19 (Fig. 2). The essential role of the vagus nerve in the autonomic regulation of vital functions and neuro-immune processes provides a rationale for non-invasive and affordable therapeutic innovations, which should be exploited more broadly by public health policies, for AD as well as for COVID-19 and for pandemics that may arise in future [139]. The available experimental and clinical data point to the need for immediate large-scale testing of a bioelectronic medical strategy for severe COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment. In addition, because of the similarities of AD-related dysautonomia with the short term, life-threatening dysautonomia in severe COVID-19, the innovative achievements developed for COVID-19 in this context may turn out to help ameliorate cognitive deficits of AD patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We express our gratitude to Professor Anne DIDIER (University of Lyon, France) for critical review of the manuscript and communication of late discoveries about SARS-CoV-2 infection of the olfactory mucosa.

References

Onder

, Rezza

, Brusaferro

(2020) Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA 323, 1775–1776.

Alzheimer’s Association (2019) 2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 15, 321–387.

Atkins

, Masoli

JAH

, Delgado

, Pilling

, Kuo

, Kuchel

, Melzer

(2020) Preexisting comorbidities predicting COVID-19 and mortality in the UK biobank community cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 75, 2224–2230.

Brown

, Kular

, Rajji

, Pollock

, Mulsant

(2020) Anticipating and mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 7, 712–721.

Kuo

, Pilling

, Atkins

, Masoli

JAH

, Delgado

, Kuchel

, Melzer

(2020) ApoE e4e4 genotype and mortality with COVID-19 in UK Biobank. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 75, 1801–1803.

Perry

(2020) Alzheimer’s disease patients in the crosshairs of COVID-19. J Alzheimers Dis 76, 1.

Tulba

, Cozma

, Popescu

, Davidescu

(2020) Dysautonomia in Alzheimer’s disease. Medicina 56, 337.

Fulop

, Larbi

, Dupuis

, Le Page

, Frost

, Cohen

, Witkowski

, Franceschi

(2018) Immunosenescence and inflamm-aging as two sides of the same coin: Friends or foes?. Front Immunol 8, 1960.

Porzionato

, Macchi

, Morsut

, Parenti

, De Caro

(2005) Microvascular patterns in human medullary tegmentum at the level of the area postrema. J Anat 206, 405–410.

10.

Ellul

, Benjamin

, Singh

, Lant

, Michael

, Easton

, Kneen

, Defres

, Sejvar

, Solomon

(2020) Neurological associations of COVID-19. Lancet Neurol 19, 767–783.

11.

, Xu

, Chen

, Duan

, Hashimoto

, Yang

, Liu

, Yang

(2020) Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behav Immun 87, 18–22.

12.

Fotuhi

, Mian

, Meysami

, Raji

(2020) Neurobiology of COVID-19. J Alzheimers Dis 76, 3–19.

13.

Yamamoto

, Bolanos

, Fiallos

, Strand

, Morris

, Shahrokhinia

, Cushing

, Hopp

, Tiwari

, Hariri

, Sokolov

, Wheeler

, Kaushik

, Elsayegh

, Eliashiv

, Hedrick

, Jafari

, Johnson

, Khorsandi

, Gonzalez

, Balakhani

, Lahiri

, Ghavidel

, Amaya

, Kloor

, Hussain

, Huang

, Cormier

, Ashford

, Wang

, Yaghobian

, Khorrami

, Shamloo

, Moon

, Shadi

, Kateb

(2020) COVID-19: Review of a 21^st century pandemic from etiology to neuro-psychiatric implications. J Alzheimers Dis 77, 459–504.

14.

Broncel

, Bocian

, Klos-Wjtczak

, Kulbat-Warycha

, Konopacki

(2020) Vagal nerve stimulation as a promising tool in the improvement of cognitive disorders. Brain Res Bull 155, 37–47.

15.

Berthoud

, Neuhuber

(2000) Functional and chemical anatomy of the afferent vagal system. Auton Neurosci 85, 1–17.

16.

Powley

, Jaffey

, McAdams

, Baronowsky

, Black

, Chesney

, Evans

, Phillips

(2019) Vagal innervation of the stomach reassessed: Brain-gut connectome uses smart terminals. Ann NY Acad Sci 145, 14–30.

17.

Hachem

, Wong

, Ibrahim

(2018) The vagus afferent network: Emerging role in translational connectomics. Neurosurg Focus 45(3), E2.

18.

Siddiqi

, Mehra

(2020) COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical-therapeutical staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant 39, 405–407.

19.

Hui

KPY

, Cheung

, Perera

RAPM

, Ng

, Bui

CHT

, Ho

JCW

, Ng

MMT

, Kuok

DIT

, Shih

, Tsao

, Poon

LLM

, Peiris

, Nicholls

, Chan

MCW

(2020) Tropism, replication competence, and innate immune responses of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in human respiratory tract and conjunctiva: An analysis in ex-vivo and in-vitro cultures. Lancet Respir Med 8, 687–695.

20.

, Verma

(2020) Happy Hypoxemia in COVID-19 - A neural hypothesis. ACS Chem Neurosci 11, 1865–1867.

21.

, McGoogan

(2020) Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA 323, 1239–1242.

22.

Connors

, Levy

(2020) COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood 135, 2033–2040.

23.

Manganelli

, Vargas

, Iovino

, Iacovazzo

, Santoro

, Servillo

(2020) Brainstem involvement and respiratory failure in COVID-19. Neurol Sci 41, 1663–1665.

24.

Zhuang

, Zang

, Ye

, Xu

(2019) Lethal avian influenza A (H5N1) virus replicates in pontomedullary chemosensitive neurons and depresses hypercapnic ventilatory response in mice. Am J Physiol Lung 316, 1525–1536.

25.

Tisoncik

, Korth

, Simmons

, Farrar

, Martin

, Katze

(2012) Into the eye of the cytokine storm. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76, 16–32.

26.

, Verma

(2020) Cytokine storm in COVID19: A neural hypothesis. ACS Chem Neurosci 11, 1868–1870.

27.

Tracey

(2002) The inflammatory reflex. Nature 420, 853–859.

28.

Hoffmann

, Kleine-Weber

, Schroeder

, Kruger

, Herrler

, Erichsen

, Schiergens

, Herrler

, Wu

, Nitsche

, Müller

, Drosten

, Pöhlmann

(2020) SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibito. Cell 181, 271–280.e8.

29.

Zhang

, Rostami

, Leopold

, Mezey

, O’Beirne

, Strulovici-Barel

, Crystal

(2020) Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 ACE2 receptor in the human airway epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 202, 219–229.

30.

Inde

, Yapp

, Joshi

, Spetz

, Fraser

, Deskin

, Ghelfi

, Sodhi

, Hackam

, Kobzik

, Croker

, Brownfield

, Jia

, Sarosiek

(2020) Age-dependent regulation of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry genes and cell death programs correlates with COVID-19 disease severity. bioRxiv 2020.09.13.276923; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.13.276923.

31.

Jiang

, Liu

, Chen

, Shan

, Zhou

, Shen

, Li

, Zhang

, Zhu

, Si

, Wang

, Min

, Wang

, Li

, Zhang

, Baric

, Zhou

, Yang

, Shi

(2020) Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 182, 50–58.

32.

Chen

, Shen

, Rowan

, Kulaga

, Hillel

, Ramanathan

Jr , Lane

(2020) Elevated ACE-2 expression in the olfactory neuroepithelium: Implications for anosmia and upper respiratory SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. Eur Respir J 56, 2001948.

33.

Brann

, Tsukahara

, Weinreb

, Lipovsek

, Ven den Berge

, Gong

, Chance

, Macaulay

, Chou

, Fletcher

, Das

, Street

, Roux de Bezieux

, Choi

, Risso

, Dudoit

, Purdom

, Mill

, Hachem

, Matsunami

, Logan

, Goldstein

, Grubb

, Ngai

, Datta

(2020) Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia. Sci Adv 6, eabc5801.

34.

Hikmet

, Méar

, Edvinsson

, Micke

, Uhlén

, Lindskog

(2020) The protein expression profile of ACE2 in human tissues. Mol Syst Biol 16, e9610.

35.

Wang

, Wang

, Luo

, Huang

, Xiao

, Li

, Qin

, Song

, Wu

, Zeng

, Jin

, Wang

(2020) A comprehensive investigation of the mRNA and protein level of ACE2, the putative receptor of SARS-CoV-2, in human tissues and blood cells. Int J Med Sci 17, 1522–1531.

36.

, Li

, Zhang

, Wang

(2020) Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor gene ACE2 in a wide variety of human tissues. Infect Dis Pov 9, 45.

37.

Verdecchia

, Cavallini

, Spanevello

, Angeli

(2020) The pivotal link between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Int Med 76, 14–20.

38.

South

, Diz

, Chappell

(2020) COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardio-vascular consequences. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 318, H1084–H1900.

39.

Lin

, Chen

, Zhang

, Chen

, Lin

, Morris

(2008) RNA interference shows interactions between mouse brainstem angiotensin AT1 receptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Exp Physiol 93, 676–684.

40.

Mendelsohn

, Allen

, Chai

, McKinley

, Oldfield

, Paxinos

(1990) The brain angiotensin system: Insights from mapping its components. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1, 189–198.

41.

Gourine

, Machhada

, Trapp

, Spyer

(2016) Cardiac vagal preganglionic neurons: An update. Auton Neurosci 199, 24–28.

42.

Moyse

, Bauer

, Charrier

, Coronas

, Krantic

, Jean

(2006) Neurogenesis and neural stem cells in the dorsal vagal complex of adult rat brain: New vistas about autonomic regulations – a review Auton Neurosci 126-127, 50–58 Neurogenesis and neural stem cells in the dorsal vagal complex of adult rat bra, New vistas about autonomic regulations –a review.

43.

Doobay

, Talman

, Obr

, Tuan

, Davisson

, Lazartigues

(2007) Differential expression of neuronal ACE2 in transgenic mice with overexpression of the brain renin-angiotensin system. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292, R373–R381.

44.

Adriaensen

, Timmermans

, Brouns

, Berthoud

, Neuhuber

, Scheuermann

(1998) Pulmonary intraepithelial vagal nodose afferent nerve terminals are confined to neuroepithelial bodies: An anterograde tracing and confocal microscopy study in adult rats. Cell Tissue Res 293, 395–405.

45.

Chen

, Haam

, Walker

, Scappini

, Naughton

, Martin

(2019) Overview: Recombinant viral vectors as neuroscience tools. Curr Protoc Neurosci 87, e67.

46.

Netland

, Meyerholz

, Moore

, Cassell

, Perlman

(2008) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J Virol 82, 7264–7275.

47.

, Bai

, Hashikawa

(2020) The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol 92, 552–555.

48.

Jacob

, Pather

, Huang

, Zhang

, Wong

SZH

, Zhou

, Cubitt

, Fan

, Chen

, Xu

, Pradhan

, Zhang

, Zheng

, Bang

, Song

, de A Torre

, Ming

(2020) Human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells and brain organoids reveal SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism predominates in choroid plexus epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 27, 937–950.e9.

49.

Engelhardt

, Laks

(2008) Alzheimer disease neuropathology: Understanding autonomic dysfunction. Dement Neuropsychol 2, 183–191.

50.

Chigr

, Merzouki

, Najimi

(2020) Autonomic brain centers and pathophysiology of COVID-19. ACS Chem Neurosci 11, 1520–1522.

51.

Tassorelli

, Mojoli

, Baldanti

, Bruno

, Benazzo

(2020) COVID-19: What if the brain had a role in causing the deaths? Eur J Neurol 27, e41–e42.

52.

Gourine

, Ackland

(2019) Cardiac vagus and exercise. Physiology 34, 71–80.

53.

Yasuma

, Hayano

(2004) Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Why does the heartbeat synchronize with respiratory rhythm? Chest 125, 683–690.

54.

Ghali

MGZ

(2019) Respiratory rhythm generation and pattern formation: Oscillators and network mechanisms. J Integr Neurosci 18, 481–517.

55.

Farmer

DGS

, Dutschmann

, Paton

JFR

, Pickering

, McAllen

(2016) Brainstem sources of cardiac vagal tone and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. J Physiol 594, 7249–7265.

56.

Machhada

, Trapp

, Marina

, Stephens

RCM

, Whittle

, Lythgoe

, Kasparov

, Ackland

, Gourine

(2017) Vagal determinants of exercise capacity. Nat Commun 18, 15097.

57.

Allen

, McKinley

, Oldfield

, Dampney

, Mendelsohn

(1988) Angiotensin II binding and the baroreflex pathway. Clin Exp Hyperten A 10(Suppl 1), 63–78.

58.

Arnold

, Gallagher

, Diz

(2013) Brain renin-angiotensin system in the nexus of hypertension and aging. Hypertens Res 36, 5–13.

59.

Lenkei

, Palkovits

, Corvol

, Llorens-Cortes

(1998) Distribution of angiotensin type-1 receptor messenger RNA expression in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience 82, 827–841.

60.

De Kloet

, Wang

, Ludin

, Smith

, Pioquinto

, Hiller

, Steckelings

, Scheuer

, Sumners

, Krause

(2016) Reporter mouse strain provides a novel look at angiotensin type-2 receptor distribution in the central nervous system. Brain Struct Funct 221, 891–912.

61.

Becker

, Etelvino

, Walther

, Santos

RAS

, Campagnole-Santos

(2007) Immunofluorescence localization of the receptor Mas in cardiovascular-related areas of the rat brain. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293, H141–H124.

62.

Paton

, Kasparov

(1999) Differential effects of angiotensin II on cardiorespiratory reflexes mediated by nucleus tractus solitarii –a microinjection study in the rat. J Physiol 521, 213–225.

63.

Ruchaya

, Speretta

, Blanch

, Li

, Sumners

, Menani

, Colombari

DSA

(2016) Overexpression of AT2R in the solitary-vagal complex improves baroreflex in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Neuropeptides 60, 29–36.

64.

Tracey

(2007) Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest 117, 289–296.

65.

Borovikova

, Ivanova

, Zhang

, Yang

, Botchkina

, Watkins

, Wang

, Abumrad

, Eaton

, Tracey

(2000) Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature 405, 458–462.

66.

Wang

, Yu

, Ochani

, Amella

, Tanovic

, Susarla

, Li

, Wang

, Yang

, Ulloa

, Al-Abed

, Czura

, Tracey

(2003) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α7 subunit is an essential regulator of inflammation. Nature 421, 384–388.

67.

Rosas-Ballinas

, Olofsson

, Ochani

, Valdes-Ferrer

, Levine

, Reardon

, Tusche

, Pavlov

, Andersson

, Chavan

, Mak

, Tracey

(2011) Acetylcholine-synthetizing T cells relay neural signals in a vagus nerve circuit. Science 334, 98–101.

68.

Ulloa

(2005) The vagus nerve and the nicotinic anti-inflammatory pathway. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4, 673–684.

69.

Zanos

, Silverman

, Levy

, Tsaava

, Battinelli

, Lorraine

, Ashe

, Chavan

, Tracey

, Bouton

(2018) Identification of cytokine-specific sensory neural signals by decoding murine vagus nerve activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E4843–E4852.

70.

Zanos

(2019) Recording and decoding of vagal neural signals related to changes in physiological parameters and biomarkers of disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 9, a034157.

71.

Yamazato

, Ferreira

, Yamazato

, Diez-Freire

, Yuan

, Gillies

, Raizada

(2011) Gene transfer of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in the nucleus tractus solitarius improves baroreceptor heart rate reflex in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 12, 456–461.

72.

Zheng

, Ma

, Zhang

, Xie

(2020) COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 17, 259–260.

73.

Kang

, Chen

, Mui

, Ferrari

, Jagasia

, Scherrer-Cosbie

, Chen

, Han

(2020) Cardiovascular manifestations and treatment considerations in covid-19. Heart 106, 1132–1141.

74.

Baig

(2020) Computing the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on respiration regulatory mechanisms in COVID-19. ACS Chem Neurosci 11, 2416–2421.

75.

Fudim

, Qadri

, Ghadimi

, MacLeod

, Molinger

, Piccini

, Whittle

, Wischmeyer

, Patel

, Ulloa

(2020) Implications for neuromodulation therapy to control inflammation and related organ dysfunction in COVID-19. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 26, 1–6.

76.

Farsalinos

, Niaura

, Le Houezec

, Barbouni

, Tsatsakis

, Kouretas

, Vantarakis

, Poulas

(2020) Nicotine and SARS-CoV-2: COVID-19 may be a disease of the nicotinic cholinergic system. Toxicol Rep 7, 658–663.

77.

Bonaz

, Sinniger

, Pellissier

(2020) Targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway with vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Covid-19? Bioelectron Med 6, 15.

78.

Femminella

, Rengo

, Komici

, Iacotucci

, Petraglia

, Pagano

, de Lucia

, Canonico

, Bonaduce

, Leosco

, Ferrara

(2014) Autonomic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease: Tools for assessment and review of the literature. J Alzheimers Dis 42, 369–377.

79.

Santos

, Machan

, Wu

, Snyder

(2017) Autonomic cardiac function in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 59, 1057–1065.

80.

Lattanzi

, Luzzi

, Provinciali

, Silvestrini

(2014) Blood pressure variability predicts cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s Disease patients. Neurobiol Aging 35, 2282–2287.

81.

Meel van den Abeelen

ASS

, Lagro

, Gommer

, Reulen

JPH

, Claassen

JAHR

(2013) Baroreflex function is reduced in Alzheimer’s Disease: A candidate biomarker? Neurobiol Aging 4, 1170–1176.

82.

Manabe

, Mizukami

, Akatsu

, Hashizume

, Ohkubo

, Kudo

, Hizawa

(2017) Factors associated with pneumonia-caused death in older adults with autopsy-confirmed dementia. Intern Med 56, 907–914.

83.

Collins

, Dillon

, Finucane

, Lawlor

, Kenny

(2012) Parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction is common in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 33, 2324–2333.

84.

Beach

, Huck

, Zhu

, Bozoki

(2017) Altered behavioral and autonomic pain responses in Alzheimer’s disease are associated with dysfunctional affective, self-reflective and salience network resting connectivity. Front Aging Neurosci 9, 297.

85.

Nonogaki

, Umegaki

, Makino

, Suzuki

, Kuzuya

(2017) Relationship between cardiac autonomic function and cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int 1, 92–98.

86.

Braak

, Alafuzoff

, Arzberger

, Kretzschmar

, Del Tredici

(2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol 112, 389–404.

87.

Parvizi

, Van Hoesen

, Damasio

(2001) The selective vulnerability of brainstem nuclei to Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 49, 53–66.

88.

Attems

, Thomas

, Jellinger

(2012) Correlations between cortical and subcortical tau pathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 38, 582–590.

89.

Kaye

, Esler

(2008) Autonomic control of the aging heart. Neuromolecular Med 10, 179–186.

90.

De Meersman

, Stein

(2007) Vagal modulation and aging. Biol Psychol 74, 165–173.

91.

Franceschi

, Bonafé

, Valensin

, Olivieri

, De Luca

, Ottaviani

, Benedictis

(2000) Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective in immunosenescence. Ann NY Acad Sci 908, 244–254.

92.

Benfante

, Di Lascio

, Cardani

, Fornasari

(2019) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors targeting the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway: A new therapeutic perspective in aging-related disorders. Aging Clin Exp Res, doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01359-4.

93.

Mercante

, Deriu

, Rangon

(2018) Auricular neuromodulation: The emerging concept beyond the stimulation of vagus and trigeminal nerves. Medicines (Basel) 5, 10.

94.

Murray

, Atkinson

, Mahadi

, Deuchars

(2016) The strange case of the ear and the heart: The auricular vagus nerve and its influence on cardiac control. Auton Neurosci 199, 48–53.

95.

Peuker

, Filler

(2002) The nerve supply of the human auricle. Clin Anat 15, 35–37.

96.

Butt

, Albusoda

, Farmer

, Aziz

(2020) The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. J Anat 236, 588–611.

97.

Koopman

, Chavan

, Miljko

, Grazio

, Sokolovic

, Schuurman

, Mehta

, Levine

, Faltys

, Zitnik

, Tracey

, Tak

(2016) Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 8284–8289.

98.

Johnson

, Wilson

(2018) A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. J Inflamm Res 11, 203–213.

99.

Sjogren

, Hellstrom

, Jonsson

, Runnerstam

, Silander

, Ben Menachem

(2002) Cognition-enhancing effect of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 63, 972–980.

100.

Merrill

, Jonsson

, Minthon

, Ejnell

, C-son Silander

, Blennow

, Karlsson

, Nordlund

, Rolstad

, Warkentin

, Ben-Menachem

, Sjögren

(2006) Vagus nerve stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Additional follow-up results of a pilot study through one year. J Clin Psychiatry 67, 1171–1178.

101.

Saku

, Kishi

, Sakamoto

, Hosokawa

, Sakamoto

, Murayama

, Kakino

, Ikeda

, Ide

, Sunagawa

(2014) Afferent vagal nerve stimulation resets baroreflex neural arc and inhibits sympathetic nerve activity. Physiol Rep 2, e12136.

102.

Kawada

, Li

, Zheng

, Shimizu

, Uemura

, Turner

, Yamamoto

, Sugimachi

(1985) Chronic vagal nerve stimulation improves baroreflex neural arc function in heart failure rats. J Appl Physiol 116, 1308–1314.

103.

Clancy

, Mary

, Witte

, Greenwood

, Deuchars

(2014) Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimul 7, 871–877.

104.

Van Westerloo

, Giebelen

, Meijers

, Daalhuisen

, de Vos

, Levi

, van der Poll

(2006) Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis during endotoxemia in rats. J Thromb Haemost 4, 1997–2002.

105.

Kohoutova

, Horak

, Jarkovska

, Martinkova

, Tegl

, Nalos

, Vistejnova

, Benes

, Sviglerova

, Kuncova

, Matejovic

, Stengl

(2019) Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates multiple organ dysfunction in resuscitated porcine progressive sepsis. Crit Care Med 47, e461–e469.

106.

Yap

JYY

, Keatch

, Lambert

, Woods

, Stoddart

, Kameneva

(2020) Critical review of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: Challenges for translation to clinical practice. Front Neurosci 14, 284.

107.

Yuan

, Silberstein

(2016) Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: Part II. Headache 56, 259–266.

108.

Burger

, D’Agostini

, Verkuil

, Van Diest

(2020) Moving beyond belief: A narrative review of potential biomarkers for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Psychophysiology 57, e13571.

109.

Liu

, Yang

, Zhang

, Wang

, Li

, Woelfer

, Walter

, Wang

(2020) Neural networks and the anti-inflammatory effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in depression. J Neuroinflammation 17, 54.

110.

Salama

, Akan

, Mueller

(2020) Transcutaneous stimulation of auricular branch of the vagus nerve attenuates the acute inflammatory response after lung lobectomy. World J Surg 44, 3167–3174.

111.

Villoutreix

, Beaune

, Tamouza

, Krishnamoorthy

, Leboyer

(2020) Prevention of COVID-19 by drug repurposing: Rationale from drugs prescribed for mental disorders. Drug Discov Today 25, 1287–1290.

112.

Staats

, Giannakopoulos

, Blake

, Liebler

, Levy

(2020) The use of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation to treat respiratory symptoms associated with COVID-19: A theoretical hypothesis and early clinical experience. Neuromodulation 23, 784–788.

113.

Tornero

, Vallejo

, Cedeño

, Orduna

, Pastor

, Belaouchi

, Escamilla

, Laredo

, Garzando

MDM

(2020) A prospective, randomized, controlled study assessing vagus nerve stimulation using the gammaCore®-Sapphire device for patients with moderate to severe CoViD-19 respiratory symptoms (SAVIOR): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial”. Trials 21, 576.

114.

International Consortium on Neuromodulation for COVID-19. Neuromodulation has the capacity to address acute and chronic effects of COVID-19. http://www.covidneuromod.org, Accessed 25 July 2020.

115.

Zhao

, He

, Jing

, Liu

, Rong

, Ben

, Liu

, Zhu

(2012) Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation protects endotoxemic rat from lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012, 627023.

116.

Hong

, Zillekens

, Schneiker

, Pantelis

, de Jonge

, Schaefer

, Kalff

, Wehner

(2019) Non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation prevents postoperative ileus and endotoxemia in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 31, e13501.

117.

Cai

, Lu

, Chen

, Huang

, Zhang

(2019) Auricular vagus nerve stimulation protects against postoperative cognitive dysfunction by attenuating neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in aged rats. Neurosci Lett 703, 104–110.

118.

Kaczmarczyk

, Tejera

, Simon

, Heneka

(2018) Microglia modulation through external vagus nerve stimulation in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 146, 76–85.

119.

Chang

, Lane

, Lin

(2018) Brain stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Psychiatry 9, 201.

120.

Ahmad

, Tejuja

, Newman

, Zarychanski

, Seely

AJE

(2009) Clinical review: A review and analysis of heart rate variability and the diagnosis and prognosis of infection. Crit Care 13, 232.

121.

Shaffer

, Ginsberg

(2017) An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health 5, 258.

122.

Griffin

(2005) Heart rate characteristics: Novel physiomarkers to predict neonatal infection and death. Pediatrics 116, 1070–1074.

123.

Sloan

, McCreath

, Tracey

, Sidney

, Liu

, Seeman

(2007) RR interval variability is inversely related to inflammatory markers: The CARDIA study. Mol Med 13, 178–184.

124.

Williams

, Koenig

, Carnaveli

, Sgoifo

, Jarczok

, Sternberg

, Thayer

(2019) Heart rate variability and inflammation: A meta-analysis of human studies. Brain Behav Immun 80, 219–226.

125.

Chen

, Kor

, Lin

, Kuo

, Tsai

, Ko

, Kuo

(2018) High-frequency power of heart rate variability can predict the outcome of thoracic surgical patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome on admission to the intensive care unit: A prospective, single-centric, case-controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 18, 34.

126.

Barnaby

, Fernando

, Herry

, Scales

, Gallagher

, Seely

AJE

(2019) Heart rate variability, clinical and laboratory measures to predict future deterioration in patients presenting with sepsis. Shock 51, 416–422.

127.

de Castilho

, Ribeiro

ALP

, da Silva

JLP

, Nobre

, de Sousa

(2017) Heart rate variability as predictor of mortality in sepsis: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 12, e0180060.

128.

de Castilho

, Ribeiro

ALP

, Nobre

, Barros

, de Sousa

(2018) Heart rate variability as predictor of mortality in sepsis: A systematic review. PLoS One 13, e0203487.

129.

Thayer

, Lane

(2009) Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33, 81–88.

130.

Nicolini

, Mari

, Abbate

, Inglese

, Bertagnoli

, Tomasini

, Rossi

, Lombardi

(2020) Autonomic function in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Spectral heart rate variability analysis provides evidence for a brain-heart axis. Sci Rep 10, 11661.

131.

Hsu

, Tai

HCH

, Chung

, Chen

(2020) Depressed sympathovagal modulation indicates sepsis in patients with suspected infection. Medicine (Baltimore) 99, e18961.

132.

Chiew

, Liu

, Tagami

, Wong

, Koh

, Ong

MEH

(2019) Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department. Medicine (Baltimore) 98, e14197.

133.

Kovatchev

, Farhy

, Cao

, Griffin

, Lake

, Moorman

(2003) Sample asymmetry analysis of heart rate characteristics with application to neonatal sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Pediatr Res 54, 892–898.

134.

Kamaleswaran

, Akbilgic

, Hallman

, West

, Davis

, Shah

(2018) Applying artificial intelligence to identify physiomarkers predicting severe sepsis in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med 19, e495–e503.

135.

Johnston

, Barrett-Jolley

, Krige

, Welters

(2020) Heart rate variability: Measurement and emerging use in critical care medicine. J Intensive Care Soc 21, 148–157.

136.

Liu

, Ni

, Peng

(2020) Enhancing the robustness of smartphone photoplethysmography: A signal quality index approach. Sensors (Basel) 20, 1923.

137.

MacKinnon

, Brittain

(2020) Mobile health technologies in cardiopulmonary disease. Chest 157, 654–664.

138.

, Dunn

, Salins

, Zhou

, Schüssler-Fiorenza-Rose

, Perelman

, Colbert

, Runge

, Rego

, Sonecha

, Datta

, McLaughlin

, Snyder

(2017) Digital health: Tracking physiomes and activity using wearable biosensors reveals useful health-related information. PLoS Biol 15, e2001402.

139.

Serrano-Castro

, Estivill-Torrús

, Cabezudo-García

, Reyes-Bueno

, Petersen

, Aguilar-Castillo

, Suarez-Perez

, Jimenez-Hernandez

, Moya-Molina

, Oliver-Martos

, Arrabal-Gomez

, de Fonsecca

(2020) Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases: A delayed pandemic? Neurologia 35, 245–251.

The Vagal Autonomic Pathway of COVID-19 at the Crossroad of Alzheimer’s Disease and Aging: A Review of Knowledge

Abstract

Keywords

THE VAGUS NERVE AS A ROUTE OF SARS-COV-2 INVASION OF THE BRAINSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR CARDIO-RESPIRATORY FAILURE AND UNCONTROLLED INFLAMMATION

The pathophysiology of COVID-19

Beyond the lung, SARS-Cov-2 displays tropism for the vagus nerve and its centers

THE NEUROGENIC DYSAUTONOMIA OF COVID-19: SIMILARITIES WITH AD AND AGING

General considerations: the central autonomic network

Dysautonomia in COVID-19

Dysautonomia in Alzheimer’s disease

Dysautonomia in aging without dementia

AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION AS AN INNOVATIVE THERAPEUTIC TOOL IN COVID-19

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a polyvalent tool in human clinics

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation as a novel therapeutic approach for COVID-19?

AMBULATORY MONITORING OF AURICULAR VAGAL TONE THROUGH HEART RATE VARIABILITY PROVIDES AN ATTRACTIVE PRE-DIAGNOSIS TOOL IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC

CONCLUSION

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

References