Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What kinds of issues does the global crisis of climate change present to aesthetics, and how will they challenge the field to respond? This paper argues that a new research agenda is needed for aesthetics with respect to global climate change (GCC) and outlines a set of foundational issues which are especially pressing: (1) attention to environments that have been neglected by philosophers, for example, the cryosphere and aerosphere; (2) negative aesthetics of environment, in order to grasp aesthetic experiences, meanings, and dis/values in light of the catastrophic effects of GCC; (3) bringing intergenerational thinking into aesthetics through concepts of temporality and ‘future aesthetics’ (4) understanding the relationship between aesthetic and ethical values as they arise in regard to GCC.

Keywords

Climate change aesthetics environment nature future generations ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbey

1988. Desert Solitaire. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

Alcaraz León

M.J.

2010–11. ‘Morally wrong beauty as a source of value’. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 40–41: 37–52. Crossref.

Auer

2019. ‘Environmental aesthetics in the age of climate change’. Sustainability 11 (18), 5001: 1–12. Crossref.

Berleant

1992. Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Berleant

2010. Sensibility and Sense. The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

Bicknell

, Judkins

and Korsmeyer

(eds). 2019. Philosophical Perspectives on Ruins, Monuments, and Memorials. New York: Routledge. Crossref.

Brady

2003. Aesthetics of the Natural Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Brady

2012. ‘The ugly truth: negative aesthetics and environment’. In O'Hea

(ed.), Philosophy and Environment. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, vol. 69. pp. 83–100. Cambridge University Press.

Brady

2013. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.

10.

Brady

2014. ‘Aesthetic value, ethics and climate change’. Environmental Values 23 (5): 551–570. Crossref.

11.

Brady

, Brook

and Prior

. 2018. Between Nature and Culture: The Aesthetics of Modified Environment. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.

12.

Brady

and Prior

. 2020. ‘Environmental aesthetics: a synthetic review’. People and Nature 2 (2): 254–266. Crossref.

13.

Burko

2010. Politics of Snow. Locks Gallery, Philadelphia, PA. See Artist's website: https://www.dianeburko.com/ (accessed 9 December 2020).

14.

Carlson

and Lintott

(eds). 2008. Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty. New York: Columbia University Press.

15.

Carlson

2000. Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art and Architecture. New York: Routledge. Crossref.

16.

Chadwick

2019. ‘Representation and transparency in artistic astronomical photographs’. Contemporary Aesthetics 17 (no page numbers). https://contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=855 (accessed 28 April 2020).

17.

Cohen

and Quigley

(eds). 2019. The Aesthetics of the Undersea. New York: Routledge. Crossref.

18.

Diaconu

2015. ‘Longing for clouds – does beautiful weather have to be fine?’ Contemporary Aesthetics 13 (no page numbers) https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol13/iss1/ (accessed 28 April 2020).

19.

Doran

2015. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. New York: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.

20.

Dow

2019. ‘Climate Change Aesthetics’. (Blog) https://jamesmdow.com/blog/2019/04/19/climate-change-aesthetics/ (accessed 4 May 2020).

21.

Edensor

2010. ‘Aurora landscapes: effective atmospheres of light and dark’. In Benediktsson

and Lund

(eds), Conversations with Landscape. pp. 227–241. Farnham: Ashgate. Crossref.

22.

Eliasson

2014. Ice Watch, details at https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK109190/ice-watch (accessed 10 January 2021).

23.

Fienup-Riordan

and Rearden

. 2010. ‘The ice is always changing: Yup'ik understandings of sea, ice, past and present’. In Krupik

, Aporta

, Gearheard

, Laidler

and Kielsen Holm

(eds), SIKU: Knowing Our Ice: Documenting Inuit Sea-Ice Knowledge and Use, pp. 295–320. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref.

24.

Ghosh

2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Crossref.

25.

Gray

, Krolikowski

and Fretwell

. 2020. ‘Remote sensing reveals Antarctic green snow algae as important terrestrial carbon sink’. Nature Communications 11: 2527. Crossref.

26.

IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio

E.S.

, Settele

, Díaz

, and Ngo

H.T.

(editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. Crossref.

27.

Haught

2017. ‘An impossible peace: the aesthetic disruptiveness of climate change’. In Giesen

, Kersten

and Škof

(eds), The Poesis of Peace: Narratives, Cultures, and Philosophies, pp. 202–220. London and New York: Routledge.

28.

Hepburn

R.W.

1966. ‘Contemporary aesthetics and the neglect of natural beauty’. In Williams

and Montefiore

(eds), British Analytical Philosophy, pp. 285–310. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

29.

Hepburn

2010. ‘Aesthetics of sky and space’. Environmental Values 19 (3): 273–288. Crossref.

30.

Hettinger

2008. ‘Objectivity in environmental aesthetics and protection of the environment’. In Carlson

and Lintott

(eds), Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty, pp. 413–437. New York: Columbia University Press. Crossref.

31.

Korsmeyer

2019. Things: In Touch with the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.

32.

Levinson

(ed). 2014. Suffering Art Gladly: The Paradox of Negative Emotion in Art. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

and Ryan

. 2017. ‘Nature, engagement, empathy: Yijing as a Chinese ecological aesthetics’. Environmental Values 26 (3): 343–364. Crossref.

34.

Lindquist

M.A.

2020. ‘Aesthetics at the intersection of the species problem and de-extinction technology’. Environmental Values 29 (5): 605–624. Crossref.

35.

Lippard

2007. Weather Report: Art and Climate Change. Boulder: Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art.

36.

Lopez

1986. Arctic Dreams: Imagination and Desire in a Northern Landscape. London: The Harvill Press.

37.

Matthes

E.H.

2019. ‘Environmental heritage and the ruins of the future’. In Bicknell

, Judkins

and Korsmeyer

(eds), Philosophical Perspectives on Ruins, Monuments, and Memorials, pp. 175–186. New York: Routledge. Crossref.

38.

Meskin

2004. ‘Aesthetic testimony: what can we learn from others about beauty and art?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1): 65–91. Crossref.

39.

Mikkonen

2018. ‘Knowledge, imagination, and stories in the aesthetic experience of forests’. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1): 3–24. Crossref.

40.

Mulgan

2011. Ethics for a Broken World: Reimagining Philosophy after Catastrophe. Durham: Acumen.

41.

Muir

1915. Travels in Alaska. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin. https://vault.sierraclub.org/john_muir_exhibit/writings/travels_in_alaska/ (accessed 28 April 2020). Crossref.

42.

Nomikos

2018. ‘Place matters’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (4): 453–462. Crossref.

43.

Oldroyd

D.R.

and Hamilton

B.M.

. 2002. ‘Themes in the early history of Scottish geology’. In Trewin

N.H.

(ed.), The Geology of Scotland, 4th ed. Bath: The Geological Society.

44.

Parsons

and Zhang

. 2018. ‘Appreciating nature and art: recent Western and Chinese perspectives’. Contemporary Aesthetics 16 (no page numbers). https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol16/iss1/10/ (accessed 28 April 2020).

45.

Powell

2015. ‘What is temporal art? A persistent question revisited’. Contemporary Aesthetics 13 (no page numbers) https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol13/iss1/9/ (accessed 30 June 2020).

46.

Prior

and Brady

2017. ‘Aesthetics and rewilding’. Environmental Values 26 (1): 31–51. Crossref.

47.

Randerson

2018. Weather as Medium: Toward a Meteorological Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

48.

Roeser

, Taebi

and Doorn

. 2019. ‘Geoengineering the climate and ethical challenges: what we can learn from moral emotions and art’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (5): 641–658. Crossref.

49.

Saito

1998. ‘The aesthetics of unscenic nature’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (2): 101–111. Crossref.

50.

Saito

2005. ‘The aesthetics of weather’. In Light

and Smith

J.M.

(eds), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life, pp. 156–176. New York: Columbia University Press.

51.

Saito

2010. ‘Future directions for environmental aesthetics’. Environmental Values 19 (3): 373–391.Crossref.

52.

Saito

2019. Aesthetics of the Familiar: Everyday Life and World-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

53.

Semczyszyn

2013. ‘Public aquariums and marine aesthetics’. Contemporary Aesthetics 11 (no page numbers) https://contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=668 (accessed 28 April 2020).

54.

Shue

2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

55.

Sibley

F.N.

1959. ‘Aesthetic concepts’. Philosophical Review 68 (4): 421–450. Crossref.

56.

Sibley

F.N.

1965. ‘Aesthetic and non-aesthetic’. Philosophical Review 74 (2): 135–159. Crossref.

57.

Sibley

F.N.

2001a. ‘Some notes on ugliness’. In Redfern

, Benson

and Roxbee Cox

(eds), Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.

58.

Sibley

F.N.

2001b. ‘Tastes, smells, and aesthetics’. In Redfern

, Benson

and Roxbee Cox

(eds), Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.

59.

Stecker

2019. Intersections of Value: Art, Nature, and the Everyday. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.

60.

Stewart

D.C.

and Johnson

T.N.

. 2018. ‘Complicating aesthetic environmentalism: four criticisms of aesthetic motivations for environmental action’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (4): 441–451. Crossref.

61.

Summerson

and Bishop

. 2011. ‘Aesthetic value in Antarctica: beautiful or sublime?’ The Polar Journal 1 (2): 225–250. Crossref.

62.

Tuan

1995. ‘Desert and ice: ambivalent aesthetics’. In Kamal

and Gaskell

(eds), Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts, pp. 139–157. London: Routledge. Crossref.

63.

Tynan

2020. The Desert in Modern Literature and Philosophy: Wasteland Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

64.

Welchman

2018. ‘Aesthetics of nature, constitutive goods, and environmental conservation: a defense of moderate formalist aesthetics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (4): 419–428. Crossref.

65.

Whyte

K.P.

2018. ‘Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises’. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (1–2): 224–242. Crossref.

66.

Ziser

and Sze

. 2007. ‘Climate change, environmental aesthetics, and global environmental justice cultural studies’. Discourse 29 (2/3): 384–410.

Global Climate Change and Aesthetics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References