In a recent paper, Allen Carlson moves away from a purely scientific–cognitive framework for environmental aesthetics towards a ‘combination position’ based on the ecoaesthetics theorised by Xiangzhan Cheng. Carlson argues that only an aesthetics informed by ecological knowledge can offer the correct foundations for the continued relevance of environmental aesthetics to environmental ethics. However, closer analysis of Cheng's theory of ecoaesthetics reveals a number of problems related to questions of anthropocentrism and in particular, the issue of an ethic based on love. In this paper, I offer an alternative approach for the future of environmental aesthetics in the form of an intergenerational aesthetics based on Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK).
AaltolaE.2018. ‘Love and animals: Simone Weil, Iris Murdoch and attention as love’. In MartinA.M. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy, pp. 193–204. New York: Routledge. Crossref
2.
AdgerW.N., LorenzoniI. and O'BrienK.L.2009. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BerkesF.2012. Sacred Ecology. Third edn.New York: Routledge. Crossref
4.
BerleantA.1991. Art and Engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
5.
BerleantA.1992. The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
6.
BradyE.2003. Aesthetics of the Natural Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7.
BradyE.2010. ‘Ugliness and nature’. Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia45 (July): 27–42. Crossref
8.
BradyE.2017. ‘Climate change and future aesthetics’. In ElliottA., CullisJ. and DamodaranV (eds), Climate Change and the Humanities: Historical, Philosophical and Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Contemporary Environmental Crisis, pp. 201–220. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref
9.
BradyE. and PriorJ.2020. ‘Environmental aesthetics: A synthetic review’. People and Nature2 (2): 254–266. Crossref
10.
CallicottJ.B.1982. ‘Traditional American Indian and Western European attitudes toward nature: An overview’. Environmental Ethics4 (4): 293–318. Crossref
11.
CarlsonA.1979. ‘Appreciation and the natural environment’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism37 (3): 267–76. Crossref
12.
CarlsonA.1981. ‘Nature, aesthetic judgment, and objectivity’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism40(1): 15–27. Crossref
13.
CarlsonA.1984. ‘Nature and positive aesthetics’. Environmental Ethics6 (1): 5–34. Crossref
14.
CarlsonA.2008. Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
CarlsonA.2010. ‘Contemporary environmental aesthetics and the requirements of en-vironmentalism’. Environmental Values19(3): 289–314. Crossref
16.
CarlsonA.2018. ‘Environmental aesthetics, ethics, and ecoaesthetics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76 (4): 399–410. Crossref
17.
CarrollN.1993. ‘On being moved by nature: Between religion and natural history’. In KemalS. and GaskellI (eds), Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts, pp. 244–266. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref
18.
ChengX.2013. ‘On the four keystones of ecological aesthetic appreciation’. In EstokS.C. and KimW.-C. (eds), East Asian Ecocriticisms: A Critical Reader, pp. 221–236. Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
EgertonF.N.1973. ‘Changing concepts of the balance of nature’. The Quarterly Review of Biology48 (2): 322–350. Crossref
21.
EverndenN.1993. The Natural Alien: Humankind and Environment. Second edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
22.
GheausA.2012. ‘The role of love in animal ethics’. Hypatia27 (3): 583–600.
23.
GodlovitchS.1994. ‘Icebreakers: Environmentalism and natural aesthetics’. Journal of Applied Philosophy11 (1): 15–30. Crossref
24.
HarawayD.1988. ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’. Feminist Studies14 (3): 575–599. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066
25.
HargroveE.C.1984. Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
HepburnR.W.1996. ‘Landscape and the metaphysical imagination’. Environmental Values5 (3): 191–204. Crossref
27.
HettingerN.2008. ‘Objectivity in environmental aesthetics and protection of the environment’. In CarlsonA. and LintottS (eds), Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty, pp. 413–437. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
HeydT.2001. ‘Aesthetic appreciation and the many stories about nature’. British Journal of Aesthetics41 (2): 125–137. Crossref
29.
HollingC.S.1973. ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4 (1): 1–23. Crossref
30.
JørgensenS.E., BastianoniS., MüllerF.. 2007. ‘Ecosystems have complex dynamics – disturbance and decay’. In S.E. Jørgensen, BastianoniS., MüllerF.. (eds), A New Ecology, pp. 143–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Crossref
31.
KantI.1790 [2000]. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by GuyerP. Translated by GuyerP. and MatthewsE.The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref
32.
KawharuM.2000. ‘Kaitiakitanga: A Māori anthropological perspective of the Māori socio-environmental ethic of resource management’. The Journal of the Polynesian Society109 (4): 349–370.
33.
LamD.P.M., HinzE., LangD.. 2020. ‘Indigenous and local knowledge in sustain-ability transformations research: A literature review’. Ecology and Society25(1). Crossref
34.
MikkonenJ.2018. ‘Knowledge, imagination, and stories in the aesthetic experience of forests’. Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics55 (1): 3–24. Crossref
35.
NaustdalslidJ.2011. ‘Climate change – the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action’. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology18 (3): 243–252.
36.
NussbaumM.C.1995. ‘Objectification’. Philosophy and Public Affairs24 (4): 249–291.
37.
NussbaumM.C.1995. ‘Objectification’. Philosophy and Public Affairs24 (4): 249–291. Crossref
38.
PadenR., HarmonL.K. and MillingC.R.2012. ‘Ecology, evolution, and aesthetics: Towards an evolutionary aesthetics of nature’. The British Journal of Aesthetics52 (2): 123–139. Crossref
39.
ParsonsG.2006. ‘Theory, observation, and the role of scientific understanding in the aesthetic appreciation of nature’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy36 (2): 165–186. Crossref
40.
RolstonH.III1979. ‘Can and ought we follow nature?’Environmental Ethics1 (1): 7–30. Crossref
41.
RolstonH.III1988. Environmental Ethics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
42.
RolstonH.III2002. ‘From beauty to duty: Aesthetics of nature and environmental ethics’. In BerleantA. (ed.), Environment and the Arts: Perspectives on Environmental Aesthetics, pp. 127–141. Aldershot: Ashgate.
43.
RoseD.B.1996. Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.
44.
SaitoY.1998. ‘The aesthetics of unscenic nature’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism56 (2): 101–111. Crossref
ThompsonJ.1995. ‘Aesthetics and the value of nature’. Environmental Ethics17 (3): 291–305.
51.
ToadvineTed2010. ‘Ecological aesthetics’. In H.R. Sepp and EmbreeL (eds), Handbook of Phenomenological Aesthetics, pp. 85–91. Contributions to Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Crossref
52.
TrosperR.L.1995. ‘Traditional American Indian economic policy’. American Indian Culture and Research Journal19 (1): 65–95. Crossref
53.
Tuhiwai SmithL.2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
