Justice entitles everyone in the world, including future generations, to an equitable share of the benefits of the world's natural resources. I argue that even though both Rawls and his libertarian critics seem hostile to it, this resource equity principle, suitably clarified, is a major part of an adequate strict compliance theory of global justice whether or not we take a libertarian or a Rawlsian approach. I offer a defence of the resource equity principle from both points of view.
BarryB.1973The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
2.
BarryB.1977 “Justice Between generations”, in Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of H.L.A. Hart, edited by HackerP.M.S. and RazJ.. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
3.
BaylesMichael1978 “Famine or Food: Sacrificing for Future or Present Generations”, in Ethics, Free Enterprise and Public Policy: Original Essays on Moral Issues in Business, edited by DeGeorgeR. and PichlerJ.. Oxford University Press.
4.
BeitzC.1979Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton University Press.
5.
CallahanD.1971 “What Obligations do we have to Future Generations?” American Ecclesiastical Review164: 273–5.
6.
CoaleA.J.1987 “Recent Trends in Fertility in the Less Developed Countries”, Science221: 828–32.
7.
HospersJohn1974 “The Libertarian Manifesto”, in The Libertarian Alternative, edited by MachanTibor. Chicago, Nelson-Hall, Inc.
8.
International Task Force1985Tropical Forests: A Call for Action, Part I, p. 12. World Resources Institute.
9.
MaresMichael1986 “Conservation in South America: Problems, Consequences and Solutions”, Science233: 734–9.
10.
NagelThomas1986The View From Nowhere.Oxford University Press.
11.
O'NeillOnora1988 “Hunger, Needs and Rights”, in Problems of International Justice edited by Luper-FoySteven, 67–84. Boulder, Westview Press.
12.
ParfitDerek1984Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.
13.
RawlsJohn1971A Theory of Justice. Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.
14.
RawlsJohn1985 “Justice as fairness”, Philosophy and public Affairs14: 231–2.
15.
ScanlonThomas1973 “Rawls’ Theory of Justice”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review121.
16.
SchefflerSamuel1982The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
17.
SmartJ.J.C. and BernardWilliams1973Utilitarianism For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
18.
WilliamsBernard1973Problems of the Self.Cambridge University Press.
