The creation of new wetlands along rivers as an instrument to mitigate flood risks in times of climate change seduces us to approach the landscape from a ‘managerial’ perspective and threatens a more place-oriented approach. How to provide ecological restoration with a broad cultural context that can help prevent these new landscapes from becoming non-places, devoid of meaning and with no real connection to our habitable world. In this paper, I discuss three possible alternative interpretations of the meaning of places and place attachment in these ‘new nature’ projects, and show how all three imply a different view on human identity and history.
AugéM.1995. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (translated by HoweJ.). London, New York: Verso.
2.
BosteelsB.2003. ‘Nonplaces. An anecdoted topography of contemporary French theory’. Diacritics33(3/4): 117–139.
3.
BrookI.2006. ‘Restoring landscapes: the authenticity problem’. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31: 1600–1605.
4.
BuijsA. E.. 2004. Gevoelsrendement van natuurontwikkeling langs de rivieren. Alterra Rapport 868. Wageningen: Alterra.
5.
BuijsA.E.2009. ‘Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains’. Journal of Environmental Management, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006.
6.
CaseyE.1993. Getting Back into Place. Towards a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
CertomaC.2009. ‘Environmental politics and place authenticity protection’. Environmental Values18(3): 313–341.
DavenportM.A. and AndersonD.H.. 2005. ‘Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change’. Society and Natural Resources, 18(7): 625–641.
10.
DorsonR.M.1977. American Folklore.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
DrenthenM.2005. ‘Wildness as a critical border concept: Nietzsche and the debate on wilderness restoration’. Environmental Values, 14(3): 317–333.
EverndenN.1993. The Natural Alien. Humankind and the Environment, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
14.
FirthD.2008. ‘Do meaningful relationships with nature contribute to a worthwhile life?’ Environmental Values, 17(2): 145–164.
15.
HelmerW.1996. ‘Waanzinnige oases’, in BarendregtA., AmeszM. and van Mid-delaarJ. (eds.), Natuurontwikkeling: zin of waanzin? (Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht), pp. 81–90.
16.
HelmerW. and OvermarsW.. 1998. ‘Genius of place’. Aarde and Mens2(2): 3–10.
17.
HiggsE.2003. Nature by Design. People, Natural Process, and Ecological Restoration.Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
HowardP.2004: ‘Spatial planning for landscape: mapping the pitfalls’. Landscape Research, 29(4), 423–434.
19.
JanzB.2009. “‘Thinking like a mountain.” Ethics and place as travelling concepts’, in DrenthenM., KeulartzJ. and ProctorJ. (eds.), New Visions of Nature. Complexity and Authenticity (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 181–195.
20.
JordanW.R.III.2003. The Sunflower Forest. Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature.Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
LightA.2003. ‘Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: a pragmatic perspective’, in LightA. and RolstonH.III (eds.), Environmental Ethics (London: Blackwell), pp. 398–411.
22.
LowenthalD.2007. ‘Living with and looking at landscape’. Landscape Research, 32 (5): 635–656.
23.
LowenthalD.2008. ‘Authenticities past and present’. CRM Journal: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship, 5(1): 6–17.
24.
MartinD.G.2003. ‘Place-framing as place-making: constituting a neighbourhood for organizing and activism’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3): 730–750.
PaulyD.1995. ‘Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution10(10): 430.
27.
SnowD.A. and BenfordR.D.. 1988. ‘Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization,’ International Social Movement Research1: 197–219.
28.
SnowD.A. and BenfordR.D.. 1992. ‘Master frames and cycles of protest’. In MorrisA.D. and MuellerC.M. (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 133–155.
29.
SouléM. and LeaseG.. 1995. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction.Washington, DC: Island Press.
30.
StephanovicI.2000. Safeguarding Our Common Future. Rethinking Sustainable Development. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
TilleyC.1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape. Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
32.
Van der BruggeR., RotmansJ. and LoorbachD.2005. ‘The transition in Dutch water management’. Regional Environmental Change, 5: 164–176.
33.
Van der HeijdenH.-A.2005. ‘Ecological restoration, environmentalism and the Dutch politics of “new nature”’. Environmental Values, 14(4): 427–446.
34.
Van ToornW.1988. Een leeg landschap.Amsterdam: Querido.
35.
Van ToornW.1998. Leesbaar landschap.Amsterdam: Querido.
36.
Van ToornW.1999. De rivier.Amsterdam: Querido.
37.
VeraF.2006. ‘The Shifting Baseline Syndrome: the pitfall of language in restoration ecology’. Presentation in Zurich, Switzerland on 10 July 2006 at the conference Restoring or renaturing? The presence of the past in ecological restoration.
