Rewilding is an increasingly popular strategy in landscape management, yet it is also controversial, especially when applied in culturally ‘layered’ landscapes. In this paper I examine what is morally at stake in debates between proponents of rewilding and those that see traditional cultural landscapes as worthy of protection. I will argue that rewilding should not only be understood as a conservation practice, but that we also need to understand its hermeneutic aspect. Rewilding implies a radical non-anthropocentric normative reinterpretation of landscape and human history that calls for a critical re-examination of the cultural identities that are based on that history.
AbbeyE.1971. Desert Solitaire. New York: 1st Ballantine Books edition.
2.
BarraudR. and PérigordM.. 2013. ‘Rewilding Europe: A renewal of natural heritage-making?’ L'Espace géographique42 (3): 240–255.
3.
BauerN., WallnerA. and HunzikerM.. 2009. ‘The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland’. Journal of Environmental Management90 (9): 2910–2920. Crossref.
4.
BekoffM.2014. Rewilding Our Hearts: Building Pathways of Compassion and Coexistence. Novato: New World Library.
5.
BlankesteijnH.1997. ‘De mens moet leren verwerken dat natuur fluctueert’. NRC, 25 October 1997.
6.
BuijsA.E.2009. ‘Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains’. Journal of Environmental Management90 (8): 2680–2689. Crossref.
7.
BulkensM., MuzainiH. and MincaC.. 2016. ‘Dutch new nature: (re)landscaping the Millingerwaard’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management59 (5): 808–825. Crossref.
8.
CarverS.2012. ‘(Re)creating Wilderness: Rewilding and habitat restoration’. In HowardP., ThompsonI. and WatertonE. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, pp. 383–394. London: Routledge.
9.
CarverS.2014. ‘Making real space for nature: A continuum approach to UK conservation’. ECOS35 (3/4): 4–14.
10.
Chapron, . 2014. ‘Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes’. Science346: 1517–1519. Crossref.
11.
ClingermanF.2004. ‘Beyond the flowers and the stones: “Emplacement” and the modelling of nature’. Philosophy in the Contemporary World11: 17–24. Crossref.
12.
Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention.Florence.
13.
DeliègeG.2016. ‘Contact! Contact! Nature preservation as the preservation of meaning’. Environmental Values25 (4): 409–425. Crossref.
14.
DrenthenM.2005. ‘Wildness as critical border concept: Nietzsche and the debate on wilderness restoration’. Environmental Values14 (3): 317–337. Crossref.
15.
DrenthenM.2009a. ‘Ecological restoration and place attachment: Emplacing non-place?’ Environmental Values18 (3): 285–312. Crossref.
DrenthenM.2011. ‘Reading ourselves through the land: Landscape hermeneutics and ethics of place’. In ClingermanF. and DixonM. (eds), Placing Nature on the Borders of Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics, pp. 123–38. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
18.
DrenthenM.2013. ‘New nature narratives. Landscape hermeneutics and environmental ethics’. In ClingermanF., DrenthenM., TreanorB. and UtslerD. (eds), Interpreting Nature, pp. 225–41. New York: Fordham University Press. Crossref.
19.
DrenthenM. and KeulartzJ.. 2014. ‘Introduction’. In DrenthenM. and KeulartzJ. (eds), Old World and New World Perspectives in Environmental Philosophy, pp. 1–14. Cham: Springer.
20.
DrenthenM.2015. ‘Layered landscapes, conflicting narratives and environmental art. Painful memories, embarrassing histories of place?’ In HavlickD. and HourdequinM. (eds), Restoring Layered Landscapes, pp. 239–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref.
21.
DrenthenM. and DeliègeG.. 2014. ‘Nature restoration: Avoiding technological fixes, dealing with moral conflicts’. Ethical Perspectives21 (1): 101–32.
22.
GadamerH.-G.2006. Truth and Method. London: Continuum.
23.
GammonA.2018. ‘The many meanings of rewilding: An introduction and the case for a broad conceptualisation’. Environmental Values27: 331–350. Crossref.
24.
GobsterP.2012. ‘Alternative approaches to urban natural areas restoration: Integrating social and ecological goals’. In StanturfJ. (eds), Forest Landscape Restoration: Integrating Natural and Social Sciences, pp. 155–176. World Forests 15. Dordrecht: Springer. Crossref.
25.
Green Anarchy/Wildroots Collective. 2004. Back to Basics, Volume Three: A Primer for a Balanced Existence Amid the Ruins of Civilization. (Green Anarchy #16/ Spring 2004). Archived on http://docslide.us/documents/green-anarchy-rewilding.html Accessed 2 July 2017.
26.
HallM.2005. Earth Repair: A Transatlantic History of Environmental Restoration, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
27.
HallM. (ed.). 2010. Restoration and History. The Search for a Usable Environmental Past. New York: Routledge.
28.
HallM.2014. ‘Extracting culture or injecting nature? Rewilding in transatlantic perspective’. In DrenthenM. and KeulartzJ. (eds), Old World and New World Perspectives in Environmental Philosophy, pp. 17–35. Cham: Springer.
29.
HelmerW.1996. ‘Waanzinnige oases’. In BarendregtA., AmeszM. and van MiddelaarJ. (eds), Natuurontwikkeling: zin of waanzin?, pp. 81–90. Utrecht: Department of Environmental Studies Utrecht University.
30.
HourdequinM. and HavlickD. (eds). 2016. Restoring Layered Landscapes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
HowleyP.2011. ‘Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes’. Ecological Economics72: 161–169. Crossref.
32.
HughesF., StrohP., AdamsW., KirbyK., MountfordJ. and WarringtonS.. 2011. ‘Monitoring and evaluating large-scale, “open-ended” habitat creation projects: A journey rather than a destination’. Journal for Nature Conservation19 (4): 245–53. Crossref.
33.
JamesS.2013. ‘Finding – and failing to find – meaning in Nature’. Environmental Values22 (5): 609–625. Crossref.
KeulartzJ.1998. Struggle for Nature. New York: Routledge.
36.
KolenJ. and RenesJ. (eds). 2015. Landscape Biographies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
37.
LongstrethR. (ed.) 2008. Cultural Landscapes: Balancing Nature and Heritage in Conservation Practice.Minneapolis; University of Minnesota Press.
38.
LorimerJ. and DriessenC.. 2014. ‘Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen. Rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39 (2): 169–181. Crossref.
39.
MacfarlaneR.2007. The Wild Places. London: Granta Books.
40.
McMorranR., PriceM.F. and McVittieA.. 2006. A Review of the Benefits and Opportunities Attributed to Scotland's Landscapes of Wild Character. Inverness: Scottish Natural Heritage.
41.
MonbiotG.2013. Feral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
MonbiotG.2017. ‘The Lake District's world heritage site status is a betrayal of the living world’. The Guardian, 11 July 2017.
43.
O'NeillJ., HollandA. and LightA. (eds). 2008. Environmental Values. New York: Routledge.
44.
PriorJ. and WardK.. 2016. ‘Rethinking Rewilding: A response to Jørgensen’. Geoforum69: 132–135. Crossref.
45.
RebanksJ.2015. The Shepherd's Life: A Tale of the Lake District. London: Penguin.
46.
RicoeurP.1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Ed. and trans. by ThompsonJohn B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
47.
RicoeurP.1992. Oneself as Another. Trans. by BlameyKathleen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
RoymansN., GerritsenF., Van der HeijdenC., BosmaK. and KolenJ.. 2009. ‘Landscape biography as research strategy: The case of the South Netherlands Project’. Landscape Research34 (3): 337–359.
49.
SchepersF. and JepsonP.. 2016. ‘Rewilding in a European context’. International Journal of Wilderness22: 25–30.
50.
TallisH. and LubchencoJ.. 2014. ‘Working together: A call for inclusive conservation’. Nature515: 27–28. Crossref.
51.
TokarskiM. and GammonA.. 2016. ‘Cultivating a Dialogue: Rewilding, Heritage Landscapes, and Belonging’. The Trumpeter32 (2): 146–154.
52.
TonnaerA.2014. ‘Envisioning the Dutch Serengeti: An exploration of touristic imaginings of the wild in the Netherlands’. In SalazarN. and GraburnN. (eds), Tourism Imaginaries: Anthropological Approaches, pp. 242–259. New York: Berghahn Books.
53.
Van den BergA. and KooleS.. 2006. ‘New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes’. Landscape and Urban Planning78: 362–372. Crossref.
54.
Van LieshoutM. and JansenC.. 2008. ‘Ecologische Hoofdstructuur in de verdruk-king’. De Volkskrant, 8 July 2008.
55.
VeraF.2010. ‘The shifting baseline syndrome in restoration ecology’. In HallM., (ed.) Restoration and History, pp. 98–110. New York: Routledge.
56.
WeilacherU.2008. Syntax of Landscape. The Landscape Architecture of Peter Latz and Partners. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.
57.
WesthoffV.1970. ‘New criteria for nature reserves’. New Scientist46: 108–113.
