Abstract
Carbon materials have been regarded as promising agents for hydrogen storage because of properties such as their light weight, acceptable affinity of carbon for hydrogen and high specific surface area. We can identify many different carbon materials which have been studied extensively such as activated carbons (AC) graphene sheets (GS), carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and other derivative carbon materials derived from theoretical and experimental methods such as g-C3N4, graphyne and carbon nanolayer. These materials can be modified by additional ingredients like free metals, metal oxides, and alloys to improve their hydrogen storage capacity. In this short review article, we attempt to introduce new, reliable, complete and categorised data for researchers concentrating on articles from the last five years (2013–2017) relating to hydrogen storage.
References
1.
Abid H.R.
,
Rada Z.H.
,
Shang J.
2016 ) Polyhedron , 120 , 103 –111 .
2.
Jabbari V.
,
Veleta J.M.
,
Zarei-Chaleshtori M.
2016 ) Chem. Eng. J. , 304 , 774 –783 .
3.
Lotfi R.
, and
Saboohi Y.
(2014 ) Comput. Theor. Commun. , 1044 , 36 –43 .
4.
Yang L.-T.
,
Qiu L.-G.
,
Hu S.-M.
2013 ) Inorg. Chem. Commun. , 35 , 265 –267 .
5.
Latroche M.
,
Surblé S.
,
Serre C.
2006 ) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , 45 , 8227 –8231 .
6.
Langmi H.W.
,
Ren J.
,
North B.
2014 ) Electrochim. Acta , 128 , 368 –392 .
7.
Laredo G.C.
,
Vega-Merino P.M.
,
Ascención Montoya-de la Fuente J.
2016 ) Fuel , 180 , 284 –291 .
8.
Li J.-R.
,
Ma Y.
,
McCarthy M.C.
2011 ) Coord. Chem. Rev. , 255 , 1791 –1823 .
9.
Shiraz H.G.
, and
Shiraz M.G.
(2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen. Energ. , 42 , 11528 –11533 .
10.
Ismail M.
,
Juahir N.
, and
Mustafa N.S.
(2014 ) J. Phy. Chem. C , 118 , 18878 –18883 .
11.
Rather S.-U.
, and
Nahm K.S.
(2014 ) Mat. Res. Bull. , 49 , 525 –530 .
12.
Li D.
,
Luo H.
,
Cai J.
2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 403 , 645 –651 .
13.
Du Y.
,
Xue Q.
,
Zhang Z.
2015 ) AIP Adv. , 5 , 027136 .
14.
Dündar-Tekkaya E.
, and
Karatepe N.
(2015 ) Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. , 23 , 535 –541 .
15.
Seenithurai S.
,
Pandyan R.K.
,
Kumar S.V.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 11990 –11998 .
16.
Jalili S.
, and
Majidi R.
(2007 ) J. Iran. Chem. Soc. , 4 , 431 –437 .
17.
Imran Din M.
,
Ashraf S.
, and
Initsar A.
(2017 ) Sci. Prog. , 100 , 299 –312 .
18.
Kostoglou N.
,
Tzitzios V.
,
Kontos A.G.
2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 6844 –6852 .
19.
Tayyebi A.
,
Outokesh M.
,
Moradi S.
2015 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 353 , 350 –362 .
20.
Granja-DelRío A.
,
Alonso J.A.
, and
López M.J.
(2017 ) Comput. Theor. Commun. , 1107 , 23 –29 .
21.
Enriquez J.I.G.
, and
Villagracia A.R.C.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 12157 –12166 .
22.
Choudhary A.
,
Malakkal L.
,
Siripurapu R.K.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 17652 –17656 .
23.
Zhou Y.
,
Chu W.
,
Jing F.
2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 410 , 166 –176 .
24.
Gu D.
, and
Fein J.B.
(2015 ) Colloid. Surface. A , 481 , 319 –327 .
25.
Pavel O.
,
Krasnov G.S.S.
,
Kuzubov A.A.
, and
Kovaleva E.A.
(2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 416 , 766 –771 .
26.
Seifi H.
, and
Masoum S.
(2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 30145 –30155 .
27.
Guo J.-H.
,
Liu D.-D.
,
Li X.-D.
2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 43 , 2247 –2255 .
28.
Zubizarreta L.
,
Arenillas A.
, and
Pis J.J.
(2009 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 34 , 4575 –4581 .
29.
Khoshnevisan B.
,
Yazdani Kachoei M.
, and
Mohammadi M.
(2013 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 38 , 4618 –4621 .
30.
Zhu B.
,
Xia P.
,
Ho W.
2015 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 344 , 188 –195 .
31.
Dündar-Tekkaya E.
, and
Karatepe N.
(2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 7665 –7670 .
32.
Banerjee S.
,
Dasgupta K.
,
Kumar A.
2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 3268 –3276 .
33.
Rather S.U.
, and
Hwang S.-W.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 18114 –18120 .
34.
Yuan J.
,
Zhu Y.
,
Li Y.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 10184 –10194 .
35.
Rather S.U.
(2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 11553 –11559 .
36.
Wu T.
,
Xue X.
,
Zhang T.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 4168 –4176 .
37.
Barghi S.H.
,
Tsotsis T.T.
, and
Sahimi M.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 369 –374 .
38.
Barghi S.H.
,
Tsotsis T.T.
, and
Sahimi M.
(2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 21107 –21115 .
39.
Popilevsky L.
,
Skripnyuk V.M.
,
Beregovsky M.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 14461 –14474 .
40.
Seenithurai S.
,
Kodi Pandyan R.
,
Vinodh Kumar S.
2013 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 38 , 7376 –7381 .
41.
Tian Z.
, and
Dong S.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 1053 –1059 .
42.
Zhang Z.-Y.
,
Liu X.-H.
, and
Li H.
(2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 4252 –4258 .
43.
Lavanya R.
,
Surya V.J.
,
Lakshmi I.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 4973 –4980 .
44.
Shadman M.
,
Yeganegi S.
, and
Galugahi M.R.
(2016 ) J. Iran. Chem. Soc. , 13 , 207 –220 .
45.
Han Y.-J.
, and
Park S.-J.
(2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 415 , 85 –89 .
46.
Kaneko T.
,
Watanuki Y.
,
Toyama T.
2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 16323 –16329 .
47.
Gao J.
,
Ngene P.
,
Herrich M.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 10175 –10183 .
48.
Liu W.
, and
Aguey-Zinsou K.-F.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 14429 –14436 .
49.
Du J.
,
Sun X.
,
Jiang G.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 11301 –11307 .
50.
Schaefer S.
,
Fierro V.
,
Szczurek A.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 17442 –17452 .
51.
Li K.
,
Tao S.
,
Li J.
2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 4733 –4740 .
52.
Pyle D.S.
,
Gray E.M.
, and
Webb C.J.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 19098 –19113 .
53.
López-Corral I.
,
de Celis J.
,
Juan A.
, and
Irigoyen B.
(2012 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 37 , 10156 –10164 .
54.
Zhang H-P.
,
Luo X-G.
,
Lin X-Y.
,
Lu X.
, and
Leng Y.
(2013 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 38 , 14269 –14275 .
55.
Xia K.
,
Hu J.
, and
Jiang J.
(2014 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 315 , 261 –267 .
56.
Das T.K.
,
Banerjee S.
,
Pandey M.
2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 8032 –8041 .
57.
Wróbel-Iwaniec I.
,
Díez N.
, and
Gryglewicz G.
(2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 5788 –5796 .
58.
Geng Z.
,
Wang D.
,
Zhang C.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 13643 –13649 .
59.
Xiao Y.
,
Dong H.
,
Long C.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 11661 –11667 .
60.
Lu J.
,
Guo Y.
,
Zhang Y.
2015 ) J. Solid State Chem. , 231 , 53 –57 .
61.
Gohari Bajestani Z.
,
Yürüm A.
, and
Yürüm Y.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 9810 –9818 .
62.
Ganji M.D.
,
Emami S.N.
,
Khosravi A.
2015 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 332 , 105 –111 .
63.
Liu W.
,
Liu Y.
, and
Wang R.
(2014 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 296 , 204 –208 .
64.
Seenithurai S.
,
Pandyan R.K.
,
Kumar S.V.
2014 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 39 , 11016 –11026 .
65.
Zhang Q.
,
Xu Y.
,
Wang Y.
2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 17000 –17007 .
66.
Luo H.
,
Li H.
, and
Fu Q.
(2017 ) Chem. Phys. Lett. , 669 , 238 –244 .
67.
Faye O.
,
Eduok U.
,
Szpunar J.
2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 4233 –4243 .
68.
Tachikawa H.
(2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 396 , 1335 –1342 .
69.
Spyrou K.
,
Gournis D.
, and
Rudolf P.
(2013 ) ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. , 2 , M3160 –M3169 .
70.
Tang C.
,
Chen S.
,
Zhu W.
2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 16271 –16277 .
71.
Wang J.
,
Du Y.
, and
Sun L.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 5276 –5283 .
72.
Tang C.
, and
Zhang X.
(2016 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 41 , 16992 –16999 .
73.
Nair A.A.S.
,
Sundara R.
, and
Anitha N.
(2015 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 40 , 3259 –3267 .
74.
Zhang W.
,
Zhang Z.
,
Zhang F.
2016 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 386 , 247 –254 .
75.
Dong B.-X.
,
Zhang Y.-R.
,
Chen L.-T.
2017 ) Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. , 42 , 987 –995 .
76.
Beheshtian J.
, and
Ravaei I.
(2016 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 368 , 76 –81 .
77.
Pukazhselvan D.
,
Nasani N.
,
Sandhya K.S.
2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 420 , 740 –745 .
78.
Wang L.
,
Chen X.
,
Du H.
2018 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 427 , 1030 –1037 .
79.
Puszkiel J.
,
Gennari F.C.
,
Arneodo Larochette P.
2014 ) J. Pow. Sour. , 267 , 799 –811 .
80.
Fellah M.F.
(2017 ) Appl. Surf. Sci. , 394 , 9 –15 .
81.
Gajewicz A.
,
Rasulev B.
,
Dinadayalane T.C.
2012 ) Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. , 64 , 1663 –1693 .