Objective: This research investigated the effects of a structured psychological intervention, delivered during hospital rehabilitation, on the perceptions of control in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Method: A longitudinal study was designed to assess perceptions of control (using an objective measure of locus of control) in SCI persons who participated in specialised group cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) during hospital rehabilitation. The treatment SCI group's responses on locus of control were compared with a control group of SCI persons who only received traditional rehabilitation services during their hospitalisation.
Results and Conclusions: Mean locus of control scores were not high (i.e. external) for both groups and there were no overall group differences on locus of control responses across time in comparison to the control group. However, subjects in both groups who initially perceived life as externally controlled were extracted to form subgroups. The members of the subgroup who received CBT were significantly more likely to feel in control of themselves 2 years post injury compared to similar persons in the control group. Furthermore, an external locus of control was significantly but mildly associated with depressive mood 2 years after the injury. This research suggests that the provision of a structured psychological program in the rehabilitation stage will be beneficial for many SCI persons who feel that they have little control over their lives.
MilgromJWalterPGreenS.Cost savings following psychological intervention in a hospital setting: the need for Australian-based research. Australian Psychologist1994; 29:194–200.
2.
JohnsonRLBrooksCAWhiteneckGGCost of traumatic spinal cord injury in a population-based registry. Spinal Cord1996; 34:470–480.
3.
AnkeAGWStenehjemAEStanghelleJKPain and life quality within 2 years of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia1995; 33:555–559.
4.
CraigARHancockKMDicksonHGChangE.Long-term psychological outcomes in spinal cord injured persons: results of a controlled trial using cognitive behavior therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation1997; 78:33–38.
5.
CraigAFranklinJAndrewsG.A scale to measure locus of control of behaviour. British Journal of Medical Psychology1984; 57:173–180.
6.
AbramsonLYSeligmanMEPTeasdaleJDLearned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology1978; 87:49–74.
7.
FrankRUmlaufRWonderlichSAskanasiGBuckelewSElliottT.Differences in coping styles among persons with spinal cord injury: a cluster-analytic approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology1987; 55:727–731.
8.
DinardoD.Psychological adjustment to spinal cord injury. Dissertation Abstracts International1972; 32:4206B–4207B.
9.
CrispR.The long-term adjustment of 60 persons with spinal cord injury. Australian Psychologist1992; 27:43–47.
10.
FrankRElliottT.Spinal cord injury and health locus of control beliefs. Paraplegia1989; 27:250–256.
11.
HancockKCraigATennantCChangE.The influence of spinal cord injury on coping styles and self-perceptions: a controlled study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1993; 27:450–456.
12.
CraigARHancockKChangE.The influence of spinal cord injury on coping styles and self-perceptions two years after the event. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1994; 28:307–312.
13.
CraigARHancockKMDicksonHGSpinal cord injury: a search for determinants of depression two years after the event. British Journal of Clinical Psychology1994; 33:221–230.
14.
TrieschmannRBAging with a disability. New York: Demos Publications, 1987.
15.
MooreADPattersonDRPsychological intervention with spinal cord injured patients: promoting control out of dependence. SCI Psychosocial Process1993; 6:2–8.
16.
SummersJDRapoffMAVargheseGPorterKPalmerREPsychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury. Pain1991; 47:183–189.
