Objective: To survey the social outcome of patients with schizophrenia attending State mental health facilities in southern Tasmania.
Method: Using the Statewide Mental Health Register, patients using inpatient and outpatient facilities who received a diagnosis of schizophrenia between 1981 and 1988 were identified (n = 771), and demographic and illness measures, and admissions and length of inpatient stay were compiled. The Life Skills Profile (LSP) was completed by mental health personnel for the 247 who were regular attenders or inpatients in 1991.
Results: Social morbidity as indexed by the LSP was highest in psychiatric hospital inpatients and patients in long-term rehabilitation programs, and lower in patients attending community centres. The majority of patients in suburban settings and attending community centres lived with their families, whereas patients in the inner city or in the rehabilitation service were mainly in hostel accommodation or living alone. Patients with schizophrenia attending State services were of a similar age range but had a longer duration of illness and more admissions, and had spent more days in hospital than patients who were not in regular contact with the service.
Conclusions: The distribution of social morbidity in schizophrenia confirms that the public health system is supporting a group with high social morbidity. Patients with the highest morbidity are receiving the highest levels of care and intervention.
Munk-JørgensenPMortensenPB.Schizophrneia: a 13 year follow-up. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1989; 79:391–399.
2.
RosenAHadzi-PavlovicDParkerG.The Life Skills Profile: a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin1989; 15:325–337.
3.
ParkerGRosenAEmdurNHadzi-PavlovicD.The Life Skills Profile: psychometric properties of a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1991; 83:145–152.
4.
WykesTSturtD.The measurement of social behaviours in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry1986; 148:1–11.
5.
TrauerTDuckmantonRChiuE.Evaluation of psychiatric services using level of functioning criteria. Public Health Research Project No. 90–0596. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, 1994.
6.
TrauerTDuckmantonRAChiuE.The Life Skills Profile: a study of its psychometric properties. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1995; 29:492–499.
7.
SandersonKIssakidisCJohnstonSTeessonMSalkeldGBuhrichN.Cost-effectiveness of intensive case management for people with serious mental illness. Mental Health Program. Community Health Services and Programs. Sydney: South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service, 1996.
8.
ParkerGHadzi-PavlovicD.The capacity of a measure of disability (the LSP) to predict hospital readmission in those with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine1995; 25:157–163.
9.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.1991census of local government areas: Tasmania (Cat. No. 2790.6). Hobart: Australian Government Printing Service, 1992.
