Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the adequacy of a general interview schedule for the purpose of assessing bulimia net vosa.
Method: In two waves of data collection 18–24 months apart, 250 women were assessed for disordered eating. The first interview was typical of that included in many psychiatric interview schedules and was used to screen women for selection in a subsequent interview. This latter interview, using the Eating Disorder Examination, represents the ‘gold standard’ for the assessment of disordered eating.
Results: While the psychiatric interview satisfactorily assessed disturbed eating in general, it seemed less capable of accurately assessing cases of bulimia nervosa in particular, the major weakness being the overestimation of binge-eating.
Conclusions: Structured psychiatric interviews are suitable for screening purposes to identify women with disordered eating, but identification of bulimia nervosa requires further assessment with a suitable instrument.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed., revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
2.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
3.
CooperPJFairburnCGConfusion over the core psychopathology of bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders1993; 13:385–389.
4.
BeglinSJFairburnCGWhat is meant by the term ‘binge'?American Journal of Psychiatry1992; 149:123–124.
5.
FairburnCGBeglinSJAssessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?International Journal of Eating Disorders1994; 16:363–370.
6.
FairburnCGCooperZ.The Eating Disorder Examination. In: FairburnCGWilsonGT, eds. Binge eating: nature, assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
7.
RosenJCVaraLWendtSLeitenbergH.Validity studies of the Eating Disorder Examination. International Journal of Eating Disorders1990; 9:519–528.
8.
WilsonGTSmithD.Assessment of bulimia nervosa and the evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE). International Journal of Eating Disorders1989; 8:173–180.
9.
WilsonGTAssessment of binge eating. In: FairburnCGWilsonGT, eds. Binge eating: nature, assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
10.
LoebKLPikeKMWalshBTWilsonGTAssessment of diagnostic features of bulimia nervosa: interview versus self-report format. International Journal of Eating Disorders1994; 16:75–81.
11.
BushnellJAWellsEHornblowAROakley-BrowneMAJoyceP.Prevalence of three bulimia syndromes in the general population. Psychological Medicine1990; 20:671–680.
12.
WaltersEEKendlerKSAnorexia nervosa and anorexiclike syndromes in a population-based female twin sample. American Journal of Psychiatry1995; 152:64–71.
13.
KendlerKSMacLeanCNealeMKesslerRHeathAEavesL.The genetic epidemiology of bulimia nervosa. American Journal of Psychiatry1991; 148:1627–1637.
14.
BucholzKCadoretRCloningerCRA new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. Journal of Studies on Alcohol1994; 55:149–158.
15.
WoodsideDBGarfinkelPEAge of onset in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders1992; 12:31–36.
16.
ChitkaraBMacdonaldAReveleyAMTwin birth and adult psychiatric disorder: an examination of the case records of the Maudsley Hospital. British Journal of Psychiatry1988; 152:391–398.
17.
PottsMKDanielsMBurnamMAWeissKBA structured interview version of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: evidence of reliability and versatility of administration. Journal of Psychiatric Research1990; 24:335–350.
18.
SobinCWeissmanMMGoldsteinRBAdamsP.Diagnostic interviewing for family studies: comparing telephone and face-to-face methods for the diagnosis of lifetime psychiatric interviews. Psychiatric Genetics1993; 3:227–233.
19.
FenigSLevavIKohnRYelinN.Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey. American Journal of Public Health1993; 83:896–898.
20.
FournierLKovessV.A comparison of mail and telephone interview strategies for mental health surveys. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1993; 38:525–533.
21.
WadeTHeathACAbrahamSTreloarSAMartinNGTiggemannM.Assessing the prevalence of eating disorders in an Australian twin population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1996; 30:845–851.
22.
World Health Organization.The Composite International Diagnostic Interview 1–1–Interviewer manual. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1993.
23.
WitchenHURobinsLNCottierLBCross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). British Journal of Psychiatry1991; 159:645–653.
24.
GarfinkelPELinEGoeringPBulimia nervosa in a Canadian community sample: prevalence and comparison of subgroups. American Journal of Psychiatry1995; 152:1052–1058.
25.
DuttweilerPCThe Internal Control Index: a newly developed measure of locus of control. Educational and Psychological Measurement1984; 44:209–221.
26.
RosenbergM.Society and adolescent self image. Revised ed.Connecticut: Princeton University Press, 1989.
27.
BushnellJAWellsEHornblowAROakley-BrowneMAJoyceP.Prevalence of three bulimia syndromes in the general population. Psychological Medicine1990; 20:671–680.
