Objective: To assess the outcome of 31 patients treated in a day and semi-residential psychotherapy setting.
Method: Patients had moderate to severe personality difficulties and were referred when current therapy was insufficient or because of the severity of their problems. Eighty-one percent had a Cluster C and 19% a Cluster B (Borderline) Personality Disorder diagnosis (DSM-III-R). Therapy was psychodynamically and feminist-informed and included a sociopolitical dimension. Rating scales used were the Symptom Checklist 90, Goal Attainment Scale, Global Assessment Scale and measures of health resource usage, which were completed pre-treatment, post-treatment and at 4-, 12- and 24-month follow-up.
Results: Mean duration of therapy was 4 months (68 therapy days). All clinical rating scales demonstrated marked improvements following treatment (p < 0.0001) which were sustained at 2-year follow-up. There were also improvements of health resource usage.
Conclusions: The results document the clinical efficacy of psychotherapy in this setting, provide support for the philosophy of practice, and suggest that psychotherapy outcome can be evaluated at reasonable financial cost in many settings.
AndrewsG.The changing nature of psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1991; 25:453–459.
2.
AndrewsG.The evaluation of psychotherapy. Current Opinion in Psychiatry1991; 4:379–383.
3.
AndrewsG.The essential psychotherapies. British Journal of Psychiatry1993; 162:447–451.
4.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists.The quality assurance project. Treatment outlines for borderline, narcissistic and histrionic personality disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1991; 25:392–403.
5.
MehlumLFriisSIrionTPersonality disorders 2–5 years after treatment: a prospective follow-up study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1991; 84:72–77.
6.
TuckerLBauerSWagnerSHarlamDSherI.Long-term hospital treatment of borderline patients: a descriptive outcome study. American Journal of Psychiatry1987; 144:1443–1448.
7.
WinstonALaikinMPollackJSamstagLMcCulloughLMuranJ.Short-term psychotherapy of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry1994; 151:190–194.
8.
Munroe-BlumHMarzialiE.A controlled trial of short-term group treatment for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders1995; 9:190–198.
9.
StevensonJMearesR.An outcome study of psychotherapy for patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry1992; 149:358–362.
10.
StruppH.Psychotherapy research and practice: an overview. In: GarfieldSBerginA, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. New York: Wiley, 1978:3–22.
11.
MacfieC.Psychotherapy—a personal view. Modern Medicine of New Zealand1981; December:7–9.
12.
KrawitzRWatsonC.Gender, race and poverty: bringing the sociopolitical into psychotherapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1997; 31:474–479.
13.
EndicottJSpitzerMDFleissJCohenJ.The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry1976; 33:766–771.
14.
DerogatisL.The SCL90. An outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin1974; 9:13–28.
15.
KiresukTShermanR.Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal1968; 4:433–453.
16.
New Zealand Department of Health.Equitable allocations to Area Health Boards, Run 15 Data, Auckland: New Zealand Department of Health, 1990.
17.
AndrewsG.Evaluating treatment effectiveness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1989; 23:181–186.
18.
New Zealand Department of Health.Mental health data 1987. Wellington: National Health Statistics Centre, 1989.
19.
KarterudSVaglumSFriisSIrionTJohnSVaglumP.Day hospital therapeutic community treatment for patients with personality disorders: an empirical evaluation of the containment function. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases1992; 180:238–243.
