Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article discusses estimation of multilevel/hierarchical linear models that include cluster-level random intercepts and random slopes. Viewing the models as structural, the random intercepts and slopes represent the effects of omitted cluster-level covariates that may be correlated with included covariates. The resulting correlations between random effects (intercepts and slopes) and included covariates, which we refer to as “cluster-level endogeneity,” lead to bias when using standard random effects (RE) estimators such as (restricted) maximum likelihood. While the problem of correlations between unit-level covariates and random intercepts is well known and can be handled by fixed-effects (FE) estimators, the problem of correlations between unit-level covariates and random slopes is rarely considered. When applied to models with random slopes, the standard FE estimator does not rely on standard cluster-level exogeneity assumptions, but requires an “uncorrelated variance assumption” that the variances of unit-level covariates are uncorrelated with their random slopes. We propose a “per-cluster regression” (PC) estimator that is straightforward to implement in standard software, and we show analytically that it is unbiased for all regression coefficients under cluster-level endogeneity and violation of the uncorrelated variance assumption. The PC, RE, and an augmented FE estimator are applied to a real data set and evaluated in a simulation study that demonstrates that our PC estimator performs well in practice.

Keywords

endogeneity hierarchical linear model multilevel model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

Bollen

K. A.

(1997). Change score, fixed effects, and random component models: A structural equation approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.

Ballou

Sanders

Wright

(2004). Controlling for student background variables in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 37–65.

Berkey

C. S.

Hoaglin

D. C.

Antczak-Bouckoms

Mosteller

Golditz

G. A.

(1998). Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2537–2550.

Borjas

G. J.

Sueyoshi

G. T.

(1994). A two-stage estimator for probit models with structural group effects. Journal of Econometrics, 64, 165–182.

Burstein

Linn

R. L.

Capell

F. J.

(1978). Analyzing multilevel data in the presence of heterogeneous within-class regressions. Journal of Educational Statistics, 3, 347–383.

Castellano

K. E.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2014). Composition, context, and endogeneity in school and teacher comparisons. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 333–367.

Chou

C.-P.

Bentler

P. M.

Pentz

M. A.

(2000). Two-stage approach to multilevel structural equation models: Application to longitudinal data. In Little

T. D.

Schnabel

K. U.

Baumert

(Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 33–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chung

Gelman

Rabe-Hesketh

Liu

Dorie

(In press). Weakly informative prior for point estimation of covariance matrices in hierarchical models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.

Don

Magnus

(1980). On the unbiasedness of iterated GLS estimators. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 9, 519–527.

10.

Frees

E. W.

(2004). Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications for the social sciences. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Hausman

J. A.

Taylor

W. E.

(1981). Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49, 1377–1398.

12.

Kakwani

N. C.

(1967). The unbiasedness of Zellner’s seemingly unrelated regression equations estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 141–142.

13.

Kim

J. S.

Frees

E. W.

(2007). Multilevel modeling with correlated effects. Psychometrika, 72, 505–533.

14.

Korn

E. L.

Whittemore

A. S.

(1979). Methods for analyzing panel studies of acute health effects of air pollution. Biometrics, 35, 795–802.

15.

Mundlak

(1978). On the pooling of time series and cross-sectional data. Econometrica, 46, 69–86.

16.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Willms

J. D.

(1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307–335.

18.

Spanos

(2006). Where do statistical models come from? Revisiting the problem of specification. IMS Lecture Notes—Monograph Series 2nd Lehmann Symposium—Optimality, 49, 98–119.

19.

StataCorp. (2013). Stata: Statistics/data analysis [computer software]. College Station, TX: Author.

20.

Teachman

Duncan

G. J.

Yeung

W. J.

Levy

(2001). Covariance structure models for fixed and random effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 30, 271–288.

21.

Verbeke

Spiessens

Lesaffre

(2001). Conditional linear mixed models. American Statistician, 55, 25–34.

22.

Wiley

D. E.

(1975). Another hour, another day: Quantity for schooling, a potent path for policy. In Hauser

R. M.

Sewell

W. H.

Alwin

(Eds.), Schooling and achievement in American Society (pp. 225–265). New York, NY: Academic Press.

23.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2005). Fixed-effects and related estimators for correlated random-coefficient and treatment-effect panel data models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 385–390.

24.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB