Beginning with Version 11, SPSS implemented the MIXED procedure, which is capable of performing many common hierarchical linear model analyses. The purpose of this article was to provide a tutorial for performing cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses using this popular software platform. In doing so, the authors borrowed heavily from Singer’s overview of SAS PROC MIXED, duplicating her analyses using the SPSS MIXED procedure.
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267-288). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2.
Farmer, G. L. (2000). Use of multilevel covariance structure analysis to evaluate the multilevel nature of theoretical constructs. Social Work Research, 24, 180-191.
3.
Ferron, J. (1997). Moving between hierarchical model notations. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 119-123.
4.
Ferron, J., Dailey, R., & Yi, Q. (2002). Effects of misspecifying the first-level error structure in two-level models of change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 379-403.
5.
Goldstein, H., Healy, M. J. R., & Rasbash, J. (1994). Multilevel time series models with applications to repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1643-1655.
6.
Hox, J. J., & Kreft, I. G. G. (Eds.). (1994). Multilevel analysis methods [Special issue]. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3).
7.
Kreft, I. G. G. (Ed.). (1995). Hierarchical linear models: Problems and prospects [Special issue]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(2).
8.
Kreft, I. G. G., de Leew, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
9.
Kreft, I. G. G., de Leew, J., & van der Leeden, R. (1994). Review of five multilevel analysis programs: BMDP-5V, GENMOD, HLM, ML3, VARCL. American Statistician, 48, 324-335.
10.
Lesaffre, E., Todem, D., Verbeke, G., & Kenward, M. (2000). Flexible modeling of the covariance matrix in a linear random effects model. Biometrical Journal, 42, 807-822.
11.
O’Connor, B. P. (1999). Simple and flexible SAS and SPSS programs for analyzing lag sequential categorical data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments& Computers, 31, 718-726.
12.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
14.
Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
15.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Van Leeuwen, D. M. (1997). A note on the covariance structure in a linear model. American Statistician, 51, 140-144.
17.
Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (1988-1989). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18.
Wolfinger, R. D. (1993). Covariance structure selection in general mixed models. Communications in Statistics-Simulations, 22, 1079-1106.
19.
Zhou, X. H., Perkins, A. J., & Hui, S. L. (1999). Comparisons of software packages for generalized linear multilevel models. American Statistician, 53, 282-290.
