Generally, need-based financial aid improves students’ academic outcomes. However, the largest source of need-based grant aid in the United States, the Federal Pell Grant Program, has a mixed evaluation record. We assess the minimum Pell Grant in a regression discontinuity framework, using Kentucky administrative data. We focus on whether and how year-to-year changes in aid eligibility and interactions with other aid sources attenuate Pell’s estimated effects on post-secondary outcomes for marginally Pell-eligible students. This evaluation complements past work by assessing explanations for null, negative, or muted impacts found in our analysis and other Pell evaluations. We also discuss the limitations of using regression discontinuity methods to evaluate Pell—or other interventions with dynamic eligibility criteria—with respect to generalizability and construct validity.
AndersonD. M.MonaghanD. B.RichardsonJ. (2023). Can the promise of “free” raise college attainment? Lessons from the Milwaukee Area Technical College Promise (EdWorkingPaper 22-614). https://doi.org/10.26300/jdwn-6m65
2.
BarrA.BirdK. A.CastlemanB. L. (2021). The effect of reduced student loan borrowing on academic performance and default: Evidence from a loan counseling experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 202, 104493.
3.
BaumS.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Redesigning the Pell Grant Program for the twenty-first century (Discussion Paper 2013-05). The Hamilton Project.
4.
BettingerE. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207–238). University of Chicago Press.
5.
BettingerE.LongB.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242.
6.
BirdK.CastlemanB. L. (2016). Here today, gone tomorrow? Investigating rates and patterns of financial aid renewal among college freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 57, 395–422.
7.
BlackS. E.DenningJ. T.DettlingL. J.GoodmanS.TurnerL. J. (2023). Taking it to the limit: Effects of increased student loan availability on attainment, earnings, and financial well-being. American Economic Review, 113(12), 3357–3400.
8.
BoatmanA.EvansB. J.SolizA. (2017). Understanding loan aversion in education: Evidence from High School Seniors, Community College Students, and Adults. AERA Open, 3(1), 233285841668364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416683649
9.
BurlandE.DynarskiS.MichelmoreK.OwenS.RaghuramanS. (2022). The power of certainty: Experimental evidence on the effective design of free tuition programs (Working Paper No. 29864). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29864
10.
CalonicoS.CattaneoM. D.FarrellM. H.TitiunikR. (2017). Rdrobust: Software for regression-discontinuity designs. The Stata Journal, 17(2), 372–404.
CarruthersC. K.WelchJ. G. (2019). Not whether, but where? Pell Grants and college choices. Journal of Public Economics, 172, 1–19.
13.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4), 1023–1073. https://doi.org/10.1086/686643
14.
CelliniS. R.FerreiraF.RothsteinJ. (2010). The value of school facility investments: Evidence from a dynamic regression discontinuity design. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 215–261. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215
15.
ChanM.KwonJ.NguyenD. J.SaundersK. M.ShahN.SmithK. N. (2019). Indebted over time: Racial differences in student borrowing. Educational Researcher, 48(8), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19864969
16.
ChenR.SmithK. (2023). Gender and loans: Understanding differences in student debt burden. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 52(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1812
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2010). College aid. In LevineP. B.ZimmermanD. J. (Eds.), Targeting investments in children: Fighting poverty when resources are limited (pp. 283–302). University of Chicago Press.
19.
DenningJ. T.MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2019). ProPelled: The effects of grants on graduation, earnings, and welfare. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(3), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180100
20.
DynarskiS. M.LibassiC. J.MichelmoreK.OwenS. (2021). Closing the gap: The effect of reducing complexity and uncertainty in college pricing on the choices of low-income students. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1721–1756.
21.
DynarskiS. M.PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2022). College costs, financial aid, and student decisions (Working Paper No. 30275). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30275
22.
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal, 59(2), 319–356.
23.
EngA.MatsudairaJ. (2021). Pell Grants and student success: Evidence from the Universe of Federal Aid Recipients. Journal of Labor Economics, 39(Suppl 2), S413–S454. https://doi.org/10.1086/712556
24.
EvansB. J.BoatmanA.SolizA. (2019). Framing and labeling effects in preferences for borrowing for college: An experimental analysis. Research in Higher Education, 60, 438–457.
FurquimF.DeaneK.McCallB. P.DesJardinsS. L. (2022). Like any other trap: The circuitous path of student loan repayment. AERA Open, 8, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221093325
27.
Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the Impact of Financial Aid on College Completion 1. American Journal of Sociology, 121(6), 1762–1817. https://doi.org/10.1086/685442
28.
GurantzO.TsaiY. Y. (2023). The impact of federal administrative burdens on college enrollment. Economics of Education Review, 97, 102461.
29.
KlineP.WaltersC. R. (2016). Evaluating public programs with close substitutes: The case of head start. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1795–1848. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw027
30.
Kramer IID. A.LambC.PageL. C. (2021). The effects of default choice on student loan borrowing: Experimental evidence from a public research university. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 189, 470-489.
31.
LeeJ. C.DellM.González CanchéM. S.MondayA.KlafehnA. (2021). The hidden costs of corroboration: Estimating the effects of financial aid verification on college enrollment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(2), 233–252.
32.
LiuV. Y. T. (2020). Is school out for the summer? The impact of year-round Pell Grants on academic and employment outcomes of community college students. Education Finance and Policy, 15(2), 241-269.
MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2018). Borrowing trouble? Human capital investment with opt-in costs and implications for the effectiveness of grant aid. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 163–201. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160127
36.
MarxB. M.TurnerL. J. (2019). Student loan nudges: Experimental evidence on borrowing and educational attainment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(2), 108–141.
37.
MillerK. (2017). Deeper in debt: Women and student loans. American Association of University Women.
38.
NguyenT. D.KramerJ. W.EvansB. J. (2019). The effects of grant aid on student persistence and degree attainment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 831–874. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877156
39.
NordC.RoeyS.PerkinsR.LyonsM.LemanskiN.BrownJ.SchuknechtJ. (2011). The Nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates (NCES 2011-462). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
OsterM.WiederspanM.DesJardinsS. (2020). A stumbling block on the road to college: How FAFSA verification hinders low-income students. NASFAA.
41.
PageL. C.CastlemanB. L.MeyerK. (2020). Customized nudging to improve FAFSA completion and income verification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 3–21.
42.
PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.009
43.
ParkR. S. E.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2018). The impact of Pell Grant Eligibility on community college students’ financial aid packages, labor supply, and academic outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 557–585. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718783868
44.
PernaL. W.LeighE. W. (2018). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155–180.
45.
RosingerK.MeyerK.WangJ. (2021). Leveraging insights from behavioral science and administrative burden in free college program design: A typology. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.42.197
46.
RothsteinJ.RouseC. E. (2011). Constrained after college: Student loans and early-career occupational choices. Journal of Public Economics, 95(1–2), 149–163.
47.
RubinR. B. (2011). The pell and the poor: A regression-discontinuity analysis of on-time college enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 52(7), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9215-6
48.
SchuddeL.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Pell Grants as performance-based scholarships? An examination of satisfactory academic progress requirements in the Nation’s Largest Need-Based Aid Program. Research in Higher Education, 57(8), 943–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9413-3
49.
Scott-ClaytonJ.LibassiC. J.SparksD. (2022). The fine print on Free College: Who benefits from New York’s Excelsior Scholarship? An essay for the learning curve. Urban Institute.
50.
Scott-ClaytonJ.SchuddeL. (2020). The consequences of performance standards in need-based aid evidence from community colleges. Journal of Human Resources, 55(4), 1105–1136. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.4.0717-8961R2
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Beginning postsecondary student study: 2012/2014 (BPS). https://nces.ed.gov/datalab/
55.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Table 306.10. Total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by level of enrollment, sex, attendance status, and race/ethnicity of student: Selected years, 1976 through 2016 [Data table]. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_306.10.asp
56.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Table 331.20. First-time, full-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by participation and average amount awarded in financial aid programs, and control and level of institution: 2000–01 through 2019–20 [Data table]. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_331.20.asp
57.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022a). Table 226.50. Number and percentage of graduates taking the ACT test; average scores and standard deviations, by sex and race/ethnicity; and percentage of test takers with selected composite scores and planned fields of postsecondary study: Selected years, 1995 through 2021 [Data table]. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_226.50.asp
58.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022b). Table 330.20. Average undergraduate tuition, fees, room, and board charges for full-time students in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by control and level of institution and state or jurisdiction: 2019–20 and 2020–21 [Data table]. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_330.20.asp
59.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022c). Table 331.35. Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving financial aid, and average annual amount received, by type and source of aid and selected student characteristics: Selected years, 1999–2000 through 2015–16 [Data table]. Digest of Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_331.35.asp
60.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Student Aid. (n.d.). Title IV Program volume reports: Award year summaries: Pell end-of-year reports: Table 002. https://studentaid.gov/data-center/student/title-iv
WiederspanM. (2016). Denying loan access: The student-level consequences when community colleges opt out of the Stafford loan program. Economics of Education Review, 51, 79–96.
63.
ZiskinM.FischerM. A.TorresV.PellicciottiB.Player-SandersJ. (2014). Working students’ perceptions of paying for college: Understanding the connections between financial aid and work. The Review of Higher Education, 37(4), 429–467. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0028
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
